search for: 0.2

Hi all, I'm trying to filter data into respective numbers. For example, if the data ranges from 0 to <0.1, group the data. And so on for the rest of the data. There are inconsistencies in the output. For example, b1[[3]] lumps all the 0.2s and 0.3s together while 0.6s are not in the output. Running the function - table(f1) - shows that each of the components/numbers has x number of

Full_Name: Marco Vicentini, University of Verona Version: 2.4.1 & 2.5.1 OS: OsX & WinXP Submission from: (NULL) (157.27.253.46) When I proceed to test the following equation 1 + 2 == 3, I obviously obtain the value TRUE. But when I tryed to do the same using real number (i.e. 0.1 + 0.2 == 0.3) I obtained an unusual FALSE. In the online help there are some tricks for this problem. It

Hi all, I try to generate sets of strategies that contain probability distributions for a defined number of elements, e.g. imagine an animal that can produce 5 different types of offspring and I want to figure out which percentage of each type it should produce in order to maximize its fitness. In order to do so, I need to calculate the fitness for all potential strategies. As an example, if I

Dear all- I have a dataset (see a sample below - but the whole dataset is June 2005 - June 2008). The "LST" format is "YYMMDDHHmm" and I would like to get the hourly average of the "mph" for the summer months (spanning all years). I have been trying to use "aggregate" but am not having much success at all! any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.

Both of the approx functions work correctly individually, but they are not being distinguished in the for loop by the if statments. Any help would be appreciated. for loop of interest is below x <- (structure(list(Site = structure(c(2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L,

Dear R-help, First I apologize if my question is quite simple. I need add some of data in the first place my dataset, how can I do that. I have tried with rbind, but I did not succes. 0.1 3.6 0.4 0.9 rose 4.1 4.0 1.2 1.2 rose 4.4 3.2 1.9 0.5 rose 4.6 1.1 1.1 0.2 rose For example,

Hello, I'll use part of the iris dataset for an example of what I want to do. > data(iris) > iris<-iris[1:10,1:4] > iris Sepal.Length Sepal.Width Petal.Length Petal.Width 1 5.1 3.5 1.4 0.2 2 4.9 3.0 1.4 0.2 3 4.7 3.2 1.3 0.2 4 4.6 3.1 1.5

Hello, S-plus and R helpers,(sorry for cross-post) I wrote some simple C code for one likelihood to be optimized (using optim(MASS)). I use same function, same data, same starting points and same DLL in R and S-plus for comparison. (I compiled it with 'Rcmd SHLIB likelihood.c' and the header files of it include only R.h and math.h). While it works quite fine in S-plus, it forever returns

Dear R Users, Could you please help me on the following issue? I have a real large yearly data set. For each year I have 365 flow values. Some of the flow values are not known and that’s why you will see NA written in those slots. I wanted to know, is there a way that I can estimate those values? I tried approx command but it seems least helpful for the kind of issue I am up against.

R-Helpers, I'm sorry to have to ask this -- I've not used R very much in the last 8 or 10 months, and I've gotten rusty. I have the following (ff2 is a subset of a much, much larger dataset): > ff2 hostName user sys idle obsTime 10142 fred 0.4 0.5 98.0 2007-11-01 02:02:18 16886 barney 0.5 0.2 94.6 2007-10-25 19:12:12 8795 fred 0.0 0.1 99.8

hi i try to do a graph of a time series which shows in red the values > -0.05, in blue the values >0.05 and in white the values between -0.05 and 0.05 for un exemple :http://www.appinsys.com/globalwarming/enso.htm thanks !!!!! denisse -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/how-to-do-a-graph-with-tree-different-colors-tp4635206.html Sent from the R help mailing

Hello there, I am not quite sure how to interpret the output of Rprof (in the following the output I was staring at). I was poking around the web a little bit for documentation but without much success. I guess if I want to figure out what takes so long in my code the 2nd table $by.total and the total.pct column (pct = percent) is the most helpful. What does it mean that [ or [.data.frame is

Dear all I have a simple problem which I thought is easy to solve but what I tried did not work. I want to change character variables to factor in data frame. It goes easily from factor to character, but I am stuck in how to do backwards conversion. Here is an example irisf<-iris irisf[,2]<-factor(irisf[,2]) # create second factor str(irisf) 'data.frame': 150 obs. of 5

Given a vector;> ab = seq(0.5,1, by=0.1)> ab[1] 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 The euclidean distance between the vector elements is given by the lower triangular matrix > dd1 = dist(ab,"euclidean")> dd1    1   2   3   4   52 0.1                3 0.2 0.1            4 0.3 0.2 0.1        5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1    6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 Convert the lower triangular matrix to a full

Dear all, How should I add several variables to a data frame without losing the attributes of the df? Consider the following: > require(Hmisc) > Xa <- iris > label(Xa, self=T) <- "Some df label" > str(Xa) 'data.frame': 150 obs. of 5 variables: $ Sepal.Length: num 5.1 4.9 4.7 4.6 5 5.4 4.6 5 4.4 4.9 ... $ Sepal.Width : num 3.5 3 3.2 3.1 3.6 3.9 3.4 3.4 2.9

Hi, I'm looking the best way to fill irregular polygons with patterns, Something like the function grid.pattern do, but my case is with irregular polygons. Whit this script I can get it, but I'm looking for an "elegant" solution.. library(grid) grid.polygon(x=c(0.2, 0.8, 0.6, 0.6, 0.8, 0.2), y=c(0.2, 0.2, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7,0.7), gp=gpar(fill="grey",

Dear all, I'm trying to produce 2 png files, one consisting of an image plot and a color-table (also an image plot) and the other one consisting of 4 image plots and a color table. I'd like the color table to be exactly the same. The way I proceded is the following: for one plot and the color-table png(file = png.file, width = 650, height = 800, pointsize = 16) layout(matrix(c(1, 2),

Dear all What is the easy way to drop a variable by using its name (and not its number)? Example: > data(iris) > head(iris) Sepal.Length Sepal.Width Petal.Length Petal.Width Species 1 5.1 3.5 1.4 0.2 setosa 2 4.9 3.0 1.4 0.2 setosa 3 4.7 3.2 1.3 0.2 setosa 4 4.6 3.1

Dear arun and all R users, I will first of all try to simply define my issue.. I have data in the following format Year Discharge dd/mm/yyyy x .. … … … There are some NA values in the discharge which I would like to predict by using “predict command”. I cant figure out the way to write the coding for that. Could you please help me on that??? I have also ,written

I'm pulling my hair (and there's not much left!) on this one. Basically I'm not getting the same result t when I "step" through the program and evaluate each element separately than when I use the outer() function in the FindLikelihood() function below. Here's the functions: Dk<- function(xk,A,B) { n0 *(A*exp(-0.5*(xk/w)^2) + B) } FindLikelihood <-