search for: 0.0

Dear R-users, Is there any function in R that works similarly like solver in Excel. I have a set of daily rainfall data and I would like to estimate alpha and beta for the gamma function. Here is my daily rainfall data: [1] 0.2 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.8 1.6 0.0 1.8 1.8 0.0 2.6 [24] 33.0 19.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 6.8 0.2 0.0

Dear R helpers: I have tried many times to find some way to read a list into R. But I faid. Here is an example: I have a file 'List.txt' which includes data as follows: [[1]] [1] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 [19] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 [[2]] [1] 0.0000000 0.5000000 0.0000000 0.0000000

I have historically noticed that in ZFS, when ever there is a heavy writer to a pool via NFS, the reads can held back (basically paused). An example is a RAID10 pool of 6 disks, whereby a directory of files including some large 100+MB in size being written can cause other clients over NFS to pause for seconds (5-30 or so). This on B70 bits. I''ve gotten used to this behavior over NFS, but

when check java process lock statistics, plockstat failed, please see below: # prstat -mLp 21162 PID USERNAME USR SYS TRP TFL DFL LCK SLP LAT VCX ICX SCL SIG PROCESS/LWPID 21162 7677 0.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 99 0.0 0.3 83 89 215 0 java/81 21162 7677 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 99 0.2 106 33 305 0 java/35 21162 7677 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 0.1 79 6 85 0 java/59

Hello, I was wondering if anyone could tell me why so many processes are started on my system? Here is a list of them. I am trying to figure out why they are running and if I can stop them. Thnx. USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND root 2 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< 19:33 0:00 [migration/0] root 3 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? SN 19:33 0:00 [ksoftirqd/0]

Hi! I have a problem with ZFS and most likely the SATA PCI-X controllers. I run opensolaris 2008.11 snv_98 and my hardware is Sun Netra x4200 M2 with 3 SIL3124 PCI-X with 4 eSATA ports each connected to 3 1U diskchassis which each hold 4 SATA disks manufactured by Seagate model ES.2 (500 and 750) for a total of 12 disks. Every disk has its own eSATA cable connected to the ports on the PCI-X

Hi R-users, I would like to do looping for this process below to estimate alpha beta from gamma distribution: Here are my data: day_data1 <- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 1943 48.3 18.5 0.0 0.0 18.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 2.8 1944 0.0 0.0

Hi, I''m running Opensolaris 2009.06, and I''m facing a serious performance loss with ZFS ! It''s a raidz1 pool, made of 4 x 1TB SATA disks : zfs_raid ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t4d0 ONLINE 0 0

FreeBSD psg.com 11.3-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 11.3-RELEASE-p3 dovecot 2.3.6 (7eab80676) (latest from binary package system) symptom: multiple imap4s users complain that they can not fetch mail stopping and restarting dovecot is a temporary workaround dovenull 3713 0.0 0.0 11036 6816 - I 02:27 0:00.17 dovecot/imap-login user19 3714 0.0 0.0 9464 4756 - S 02:27

Hello zfs-discuss, One of a disk started to behave strangely. Apr 11 16:07:42 thumper-9.srv sata: [ID 801593 kern.notice] NOTICE: /pci at 1,0/pci1022,7458 at 3/pci11ab,11ab at 1: Apr 11 16:07:42 thumper-9.srv port 6: device reset Apr 11 16:07:42 thumper-9.srv scsi: [ID 107833 kern.warning] WARNING: /pci at 1,0/pci1022,7458 at 3/pci11ab,11ab at 1/disk at 6,0 (sd27): Apr 11 16:07:42 thumper-9.srv

Dear alltogether, two lme's, the data are available at: http://www.anicca-vijja.de/lg/hlm3_nachw.Rdata explanations of the data: nachw = post hox knowledge tests over 6 measure time points (= equally spaced) zeitn = time points (n = 6) subgr = small learning groups (n = 28) gru = 4 different groups = treatment factor levels: time (=zeitn) (n=6) within subject (n=4) within smallgroups

On 23.11.2012, at 15:12, john skaller <skaller at users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > On 23/11/2012, at 5:46 PM, Sean Silva wrote: > >> Adding LLVMdev, since this is intimately related to the optimization passes. >> >>> I think this is roughly because some function level optimisations are >>> worse than O(N) in the number of instructions. >>

Hi all, I try to generate sets of strategies that contain probability distributions for a defined number of elements, e.g. imagine an animal that can produce 5 different types of offspring and I want to figure out which percentage of each type it should produce in order to maximize its fitness. In order to do so, I need to calculate the fitness for all potential strategies. As an example, if I

Hi Team Can someone advice me on how i can lower the load average on my asterisk server? dahdi-linux-2.1.0.4 dahdi-tools-2.1.0.2 libpri-1.4.10.1 asterisk-1.4.25.1 2 X TE412P Digium cards on ISDN PRI Im using the system as an IVR without any transcoding or bridging ************************************** top - 10:27:57 up 199 days, 5:18, 2 users, load average: 67.75, 62.55, 55.75 Tasks: 149

Hey all - Was playing a little with zfs today and noticed that when I was untarring a 2.5gb archive both from and onto the same spindle in my laptop, I noticed that the bytes red and written over time was seesawing between approximately 23MB/s and 0MB/s. It seemed like we read and read and read till we were all full up, then wrote until we were empty, and so the cycle went. Now: as it happens,

List, The past few days the asterisk service on my server has crashed several times. I have had it running for months and have made no changes to it. When it crashes, I am unable to make calls or gain access to the CLI. The service has been stopped. If I try to start it again (service asterisk start), it will start and run for a few seconds then crash again. After a reboot, it will run

I am running centos 4.2 on a P4 3 GIG with 2 GIG ram. This machine has been fine for months. my laptop is fine. X is taking 99 percent of the cpu after some time. All I was doing was editing code. If I killall -9 X it comes back for a while then maxes out again. Any ideas on something to tweek??? THanks, jerry ------------ Tasks: 120 total, 2 running, 118 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie

I tried to manually assign each of 3 arrays a unique TBAA node. But it does not seem to help: alias analysis still considers arrays as may-alias, which most likely prevents the desired optimization. Below is the sample code with TBAA metadata inserted. Could you please suggest what might be wrong with it? Many thanks, - D. marcusmae at M17xR4:~/forge/llvm$ opt -time-passes -enable-tbaa -tbaa

On 23.8.2019 17.19, Randy Bush via dovecot wrote: > FreeBSD psg.com 11.3-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 11.3-RELEASE-p3 > dovecot 2.3.6 (7eab80676) (latest from binary package system) > > symptom: multiple imap4s users complain that they can not fetch mail > > stopping and restarting dovecot is a temporary workaround > > dovenull 3713 0.0 0.0 11036 6816 - I 02:27

Dear all, Attached notunrolled.ll is a module containing reduction kernel. What I'm trying to do is to unroll it in such way, that partial reduction on unrolled iterations would be performed on register, and then stored to memory only once. Currently llvm's unroller together with all standard optimizations produce code, which stores value to memory after every unrolled iteration, which is