search for: 0.01669

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "0.01669".

Did you mean: 0.0169
2003 Jul 15
1
Why two chisq.test p values differ when the contingency table is transposed?
I'm using R1.7.0 runing with Win XP. Thanks, ...Tao ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????? >x [,1] [,2] [1,] 149 151 [2,] 1 8 >t(x) [,1] [,2] [1,] 149 1 [2,] 151 8 >chisq.test(x, simulate.p.value=T, B=100000) Pearson's Chi-squared test with simulated p-value (based on 1e+05 replicates) data: x X-squared = 5.2001, df =
2003 Jul 15
0
Why two chisq.test p values differ when the contingency
Hi Tao: The P-values for 2x2 table are generated based on a random (discrete uniform distribution) sampling of all possible 2x2 tables, conditioning on the observed margin totals. If one of the cells is extremely small, as in your case, you get a big difference in P-values. Suppose, you changed the cell with value 1 to, say, 5 or 6, then the two P-values are nearly the same. However, I
2008 Mar 21
0
How to Package Extra Results to summary.lm
Dear R users, I came up with some simple functions to give me the standard betas and tolerance values from a predefined lm() model. I have been trying to insert the results from these functions into the coefficients matrix in a modified summary.lm function that I'm calling summary2 (I'd never edit the summary.lm function directly!!). I managed to get the results inserted into the