search for: 0.0129

Hi I noticed a small inconsistency when using sum() vs cumsum() I have a char-based series > tryjpy$long [1] "0.0022" "-0.0002" "-0.0149" "-0.0023" "-0.0342" "-0.0245" "-0.0022" [8] "0.0003" "-0.0001" "-0.0004" "-0.0036" "-0.001" "-0.0011"

Hello, I wonder when I do coxph in R: coxph( Surv(start, stop, event) ~ x, data=test) If x is a categorical varible (1,2,3,4,5), should I creat four dummy varibles for it? if yes, how can I get the overall p value on x other than for each dummy variable? Thanks Lisa Wang Princess Margaret Hospital Phone 416 946 4501

This is my first post to the mailing list and I guess it's a pretty stupid question but I can't figure it out. I hope this is the right forum for these kind of questions. Before I started using R I was using STATA to run a Wilcoxon signed-rank test on two variables. See data below:

Hello, I'm posting this to receive some comments/hints about a rather statistical than R-technical question ... . In an anova of a lme factor SSPos11 shows up non-significant, but in the t-test of the summay 2 of the 4 levels (one for constrast) are significant. See below for some truncated output. I realize that the two test are different (F-test/t-test), but I'm looking for for a

>>>>> Tomas Kalibera >>>>> on Tue, 25 Aug 2020 09:29:05 +0200 writes: > On 8/23/20 5:02 PM, Rory Winston wrote: >> Hi >> >> I noticed a small inconsistency when using sum() vs cumsum() >> >> I have a char-based series >> >> > tryjpy$long >> >> [1]

Hello, I've posted a question about this subject yesterday, but since there was no R code to comment, no one did. I'm trying to have the print method for class 'htest' print some extra information common in some test, like the time series linearity related tests. Many of them have an 'order' parameter, representing a lag or embedding dimension, and it would be a nice

Dear helpers, I'm estimating multilevel regression models, using the lme-function from the nlme-package. Let's say that I estimated a model and stored it inside the object named 'model'. The summary of that model is shown below: Using summary(model)$tTable , I receive the following output: > summary(model)$tTable Value Std.Error DF t-value

LS, I'm estimating multilevel regression models, using the lme-function from the nlme-package. Let's say that I estimated a model and stored it inside the object named 'model'. The summary of that model is shown below: Using summary(model)$tTable , I receive the following output: > summary(model)$tTable Value Std.Error DF t-value

Hi, I'm sure this is simple, but I haven't been able to find this in TFM, say I have some data in R like this (pasted here: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=sjS9Zkup): > head(df) gender age smokes disease Y 1 female 65 ever control 0.18 2 female 77 never control 0.12 3 male 40 state1 0.11 4 female 67 ever control 0.20 5 male 63 ever state1 0.16

On 8/23/20 5:02 PM, Rory Winston wrote: > Hi > > I noticed a small inconsistency when using sum() vs cumsum() > > I have a char-based series > > > tryjpy$long > > [1] "0.0022" "-0.0002" "-0.0149" "-0.0023" "-0.0342" "-0.0245" "-0.0022" > > [8] "0.0003" "-0.0001"

Hello, I am trying to fit a nlme (non linear mixed effect). I am using the SelfStart function SSlogis. However the data in my hand contains few observations per subject (4 or less), so the nlsList doesn't work... In this case I should fixe initial parameter estimates. I remark that values of initial estimates have a greater effect on the model fit (i.e. loglikelihood, AIC and also on

LS, I'm estimating multilevel regression models, using the lme-function from the nlme-package. Let's say that I estimated a model and stored it inside the object named 'model'. The summary of that model is shown below: Using summary(model)$tTable , I receive the following output: > summary(model)$tTable Value Std.Error DF t-value

? stato filtrato un testo allegato il cui set di caratteri non era indicato... Nome: non disponibile URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20110220/1f45c288/attachment.pl>

All - Each time through a loop I create a new dataset, which I would like to append to a list object. Each item of the list should be the data matrix created in that step of the loop; I would like the NAME (or tag) of that list item to be assigned the value of a character string: I've tried something like this: running.list <- numeric(0) for(i in 1:num.files){ ..... running.list

Hi all, I've started looking at the GlobalMerge pass, enabled by default on ARM and AArch64. I think we should reconsider that, at least for AArch64. As is, the pass just merges all globals together, in groups of 4KB (AArch64, 128B on ARM). At the time it was enabled, the general thinking was "it's almost free, it doesn't affect performance much, we might as well use it".

Target: FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 on amd64. autoconf says: configure:2122: checking build system type configure:2140: result: x86_64-unknown-freebsd7.0 [...] configure:2721: gcc -v >&5 Using built-in specs. Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD] [...] objdir != srcdir, for both llvm and gcc. Release

LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When