16.10.2023 15:50, Ingo Asche via samba wrote:> Hi Michael, > > short question: will the Bullseye-Backports getting 4.17.12, too? > > I saw, Bookworm is already updated...Since oldstable-bpo archive in debian is always subject to manual backports-policy processing (all uploads are processed manually), I don't push stuff to oldstable-bpo often. On the other hand, this security update definitely should go to oldstable-bpo. There's just too many places to update samba in debian :) /mjt
Hi Michael, thanks for the info - and your work... As Bookworm for Raspberry isn't that far away, I can live with that. This is "just" my playground... Regards Ingo https://github.com/WAdama Michael Tokarev via samba schrieb am 18.10.2023 um 09:17:> 16.10.2023 15:50, Ingo Asche via samba wrote: >> Hi Michael, >> >> short question: will the Bullseye-Backports getting 4.17.12, too? >> >> I saw, Bookworm is already updated... > > Since oldstable-bpo archive in debian is always subject to manual > backports-policy processing (all uploads are processed manually), > I don't push stuff to oldstable-bpo often.? On the other hand, this > security update definitely should go to oldstable-bpo. > > There's just too many places to update samba in debian :) > > /mjt > >
18.10.2023 10:17, Michael Tokarev via samba:> Since oldstable-bpo archive in debian is always subject to manual > backports-policy processing (all uploads are processed manually), > I don't push stuff to oldstable-bpo often.? On the other hand, this > security update definitely should go to oldstable-bpo.https://ftp-master.debian.org/backports-new.html - samba is in bullseye backports-policy queue now, awaiting for manual review. FWIW. /mjt