search for: asche

Hi Michael, thanks for the info - and your work... As Bookworm for Raspberry isn't that far away, I can live with that. This is "just" my playground... Regards Ingo https://github.com/WAdama Michael Tokarev via samba schrieb am 18.10.2023 um 09:17: > 16.10.2023 15:50, Ingo Asche via samba wrote: >> Hi Michael, >> >> short question: will the Bullseye-Backports getting 4.17.12, too? >> >> I saw, Bookworm is already updated... > > Since oldstable-bpo archive in debian is always subject to manual > backports-policy processing (all uploads...

Op 18-10-2023 om 11:32 schreef Ingo Asche via samba: > Hi Michael, > > thanks for the info - and your work... > > As Bookworm for Raspberry isn't that far away, I can live with that. > This is "just" my playground... I have recently migrated my Raspberry Pi machines from Raspbian to Debian bookworm. It ha...

...re the Beta version there is a workaround: In "/usr/local/packages/@appstore/SMBService/usr/lib/samba" you have to change the "libidmap-samba4.so" to the one from the beta version, clear the SMB cache and then it should work again. Regards Ingo https://github.com/WAdama Ingo Asche via samba schrieb am 13.04.2023 um 21:37: > Hi Travis, > > I know, but this is now the released version (4.15.9-0919 beta > > 4.15.9-0631), see the history page for SMB-Service: > https://www.synology.com/en-us/releaseNote/SMBService?model=DS918%2B#7_x_series > > > With...

...lso an old Synology DS413 with Samba 4.4.18 (don't laugh) works perfectly, too. So I would think this patch has to be installed on the machines with the error. Maybe someone can shed some light on this bug, so I can react the right way to this. Regards Ingo https://github.com/WAdama Ingo Asche via samba schrieb am 24.05.2023 um 09:47: > Hi Travis, > > are you still there? ;-) > > How are your Synos do? Do have in the mean time installed the actual > SMBService? > > If you have and have with the actual SMBService the same problem as > before the Beta version t...

...City Solutions > Owner > [image: Rose City Skyline Logo] > > * Phone *503.821.7000 <3464881845> > > * Website *rosecitysolutions.com <https://rosecitysolutions.com> > > * Email * travis at rosecitysolutions.com > > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 3:42?AM Ingo Asche via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> to all of you which are using Synology NAS systems. >> >> With SMB-Service 4.15.9-0631 no longer shares are accessible via domain >> group rights from a Samba 4.17.7 domain. >> >&gt...

On 16/01/2023 19:55, Ingo Asche via samba wrote: > Ah, ok, just saw it. Sorry, I missed that. > > I can only add then, all three DC's in my little net are installed with > bind 9.18 and working all the same without errors. That would tend to dispel my worries, so it is possible that it is some misconfiguration...

On 05/07/2023 08:48, Ingo Asche via samba wrote: > This is the essence of the last message from Synology: > > For Synology the problem is no problem... > > They simply say now, we never claimed we are compatible with Samba AD, This, to me, seems so wrong, they take the Samba code and are not compatible with it...

...in many different aspects and functions." By the way: Do you know a good Docker Container for Samba which also can run as Member Server in a domain? ;-) Regards Ingo https://github.com/WAdama Rowland Penny via samba schrieb am 05.07.2023 um 09:56: > > > On 05/07/2023 08:48, Ingo Asche via samba wrote: >> This is the essence of the last message from Synology: >> >> For Synology the problem is no problem... >> >> They simply say now, we never claimed we are compatible with Samba AD, > > This, to me, seems so wrong, they take the Samba code and...

On 7/5/23 10:20, Ingo Asche via samba wrote: > By the way: Do you know a good Docker Container for Samba which also can > run as Member Server in a domain? ;-) there's the SINK commnunity effort: https://github.com/samba-in-kubernetes/ https://github.com/samba-in-kubernetes/samba-container -slow -- Ralph Boehm...

16.10.2023 15:50, Ingo Asche via samba wrote: > Hi Michael, > > short question: will the Bullseye-Backports getting 4.17.12, too? > > I saw, Bookworm is already updated... Since oldstable-bpo archive in debian is always subject to manual backports-policy processing (all uploads are processed manually), I don&...

On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 11:32:45 +0200 Ingo Asche via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi Michael, > > thanks for the info - and your work... > > As Bookworm for Raspberry isn't that far away, I can live with that. > This is "just" my playground... > You must not have played with your Raspber...

On 26.10.2024 16:37, Ingo Asche via samba wrote: > Hi Michael, > > thanks for your effort from me, too... Thank you for the support as well, it makes me feel excellent :) > By the way, have you planned to get the Bookworm backports up to 4.21.x? Yes, it is waiting for current 4.21.1+dfsg-2 to migrate to testing (w...

...on the Synology. Thank you, Travis Wenks Rose City Solutions Owner [image: Rose City Skyline Logo] * Phone *503.821.7000 <3464881845> * Website *rosecitysolutions.com <https://rosecitysolutions.com> * Email * travis at rosecitysolutions.com On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 3:42?AM Ingo Asche via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > to all of you which are using Synology NAS systems. > > With SMB-Service 4.15.9-0631 no longer shares are accessible via domain > group rights from a Samba 4.17.7 domain. > > It seems the same error described in th...

On 20/06/2023 20:16, Ingo Asche via samba wrote: > Rowland Penny via samba schrieb am 20.06.2023 um 21:01: > >> Try adding to the bug report. > Would that be ok even it's happening on a Synology? Just don't want to > mess around. I personally can see no reason not to, at worst your information will be...

...t. Sorry, I missed that. I can only add then, all three DC's in my little net are installed with bind 9.18 and working all the same without errors. Regards Ingo https://github.com/WAdama Stefan Kania via samba schrieb am 16.01.2023 um 20:47: > > > Am 16.01.23 um 20:35 schrieb Ingo Asche via samba: >> Hi Stefan, >> >> I have exact that running: Samba 4.17.4 and bind 9.18 from the >> bullseye-backports. >> >> I my case "samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names" runs without any >> errors. >> > On the first DC it's runni...

...eport can give some advice, too. The problem for me is that the developers from Synology think it can't be their fault. It's a little bit frustrating. Regards Ingo https://github.com/WAdama Rowland Penny via samba schrieb am 20.06.2023 um 20:17: > > > On 20/06/2023 18:30, Ingo Asche via samba wrote: >> Hi Rowland, >> >> to be clear, I'm completely your opinion. >> >> They had a running 4.15.9(-0619, their own build number), which was a >> Beta, and the released version (-0632) didn't worked. So for me it's >> obvious, too...

...onsiderations and thus not suggesting User to apply the code since they are not officially released. Who will guarantee code that hasn't been officially released yet? ================================================================================ Regards Ingo https://github.com/WAdama Ingo Asche via samba schrieb am 21.06.2023 um 10:30: > Hi Rowland, > > good point... > > That seems to be the only SID which popps up in the logs from the > Synology device. I found no other. > > I'm just looking at the same log on my working machines if this is > popping up t...

On 20/06/2023 18:30, Ingo Asche via samba wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > to be clear, I'm completely your opinion. > > They had a running 4.15.9(-0619, their own build number), which was a > Beta, and the released version (-0632) didn't worked. So for me it's > obvious, too. > > I can bring t...

Am 16.01.23 um 20:35 schrieb Ingo Asche via samba: > Hi Stefan, > > I have exact that running: Samba 4.17.4 and bind 9.18 from the > bullseye-backports. > > I my case "samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names" runs without any errors. > On the first DC it's running like I expacted, but on the second on...

On 29/06/2023 07:38, Ingo Asche via samba wrote: > Hi, > > there is some progress, even I would'nt call it that. At least they > admitted it's caused through some changes from their side. > > @Rowland: Remember that "old Samba method" part? > > This is their answer. I don't know w...