On 10/17/2017 11:22 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:> > Can you please be less vague on what the link is exactly? A suggestion > around the office from Garming was that we should:Oh sure! I posted that info already, I think, but this is the error:> ERROR: no target object found for GUID component for msDS-NC-Replica-Locations in object CN=84bea0a7-82dd-4237-9296-030573700698,CN=Partitions,CN=Configuration,DC=samba,DC=company,DC=com - <GUID=81a27497-bdfb-4977-9874-675bbfba490f>;<RMD_ADDTIME=130405075610000000>;<RMD_CHANGETIME=130405075610000000>;<RMD_FLAGS=0>;<RMD_INVOCID=556b2cb4-e576-48e2-bb7c-7f62caee84fc>;<RMD_LOCAL_USN=4605>;<RMD_ORIGINATING_USN=3630>;<RMD_VERSION=0>;CN=NTDS Settings,CN=DC1,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=samba,DC=company,DC=com> In particular, I think it would be quite safe to clean up a dangling > forward link within the same partition in: > - msDS-masteredBy > - masteredBy > - fSMORoleOwner > - msDS-NC-Replica-LocationsSo, good news :-) That's exactly what we're seeing here. So, all in all, thanks for this valuable information, I'll just go ahead and delete it! MJ
On Tue, 2017-10-17 at 11:42 +0200, mj wrote:> > On 10/17/2017 11:22 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > > > Can you please be less vague on what the link is exactly? A suggestion > > around the office from Garming was that we should: > > Oh sure! I posted that info already, I think, but this is the error: > > > ERROR: no target object found for GUID component for msDS-NC-Replica-Locations in object CN=84bea0a7-82dd-4237-9296-030573700698,CN=Partitions,CN=Configuration,DC=samba,DC=company,DC=com - <GUID=81a27497-bdfb-4977-9874-675bbfba490f>;<RMD_ADDTIME=130405075610000000>;<RMD_CHANGETIME=130405075610000000>;<RMD_FLAGS=0>;<RMD_INVOCID=556b2cb4-e576-48e2-bb7c-7f62caee84fc>;<RMD_LOCAL_USN=4605>;<RMD_ORIGINATING_USN=3630>;<RMD_VERSION=0>;CN=NTDS Settings,CN=DC1,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=samba,DC=company,DC=com > > > > In particular, I think it would be quite safe to clean up a dangling > > forward link within the same partition in: > > - msDS-masteredBy > > - masteredBy > > - fSMORoleOwner > > - msDS-NC-Replica-Locations > > So, good news :-) That's exactly what we're seeing here. > > So, all in all, thanks for this valuable information, I'll just go ahead > and delete it!That should be fine. BTW, all the dbcheck tool is going to do is delete the attribute value, I'm working on a patch to do that for the one-way-link case. I'll hold off on two-way links for now, as well as the cross-partition case. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Catalyst IT http://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba
Thanks to everybody inolved in this thread for your valuable input! dbcheck runs with zero errors now :-) MJ On 10/17/2017 12:12 PM, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote:> On Tue, 2017-10-17 at 11:42 +0200, mj wrote: >> >> On 10/17/2017 11:22 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote: >>> >>> Can you please be less vague on what the link is exactly? A suggestion >>> around the office from Garming was that we should: >> >> Oh sure! I posted that info already, I think, but this is the error: >> >>> ERROR: no target object found for GUID component for msDS-NC-Replica-Locations in object CN=84bea0a7-82dd-4237-9296-030573700698,CN=Partitions,CN=Configuration,DC=samba,DC=company,DC=com - <GUID=81a27497-bdfb-4977-9874-675bbfba490f>;<RMD_ADDTIME=130405075610000000>;<RMD_CHANGETIME=130405075610000000>;<RMD_FLAGS=0>;<RMD_INVOCID=556b2cb4-e576-48e2-bb7c-7f62caee84fc>;<RMD_LOCAL_USN=4605>;<RMD_ORIGINATING_USN=3630>;<RMD_VERSION=0>;CN=NTDS Settings,CN=DC1,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=samba,DC=company,DC=com >> >> >>> In particular, I think it would be quite safe to clean up a dangling >>> forward link within the same partition in: >>> - msDS-masteredBy >>> - masteredBy >>> - fSMORoleOwner >>> - msDS-NC-Replica-Locations >> >> So, good news :-) That's exactly what we're seeing here. >> >> So, all in all, thanks for this valuable information, I'll just go ahead >> and delete it! > > That should be fine. BTW, all the dbcheck tool is going to do is > delete the attribute value, I'm working on a patch to do that for the > one-way-link case. I'll hold off on two-way links for now, as well as > the cross-partition case. > > Andrew Bartlett >