Displaying 13 results from an estimated 13 matches for "e576".
Did you mean:
576
2020 Nov 17
7
changes on DC not replicated, while showrepl reports no issues
...l drs uptodateness
> command.
>
> I gives the following output, not sure what "unknown invocation ID"
> means. I hope someone here is able to explain..?
>
> It's output:
>
>> root at dc2:~# samba-tool drs uptodateness
>> Unknown invocation ID 556b2cb4-e576-48e2-bb7c-7f62caee84fc
>> Unknown invocation ID 7281ff0f-5af2-4ded-bdaf-362f1545d221
>> Unknown invocation ID 82b24c02-16cb-4ed1-b68b-a047c26886a9
>> Unknown invocation ID b97cc603-6d03-4ad0-8629-be408fed8d69
>> Unknown invocation ID e50c4440-f3d2-429e-a19d-c11bc72f5565
>...
2020 Nov 17
0
changes on DC not replicated, while showrepl reports no issues
...to DC2/DC3, I discovered the
samba-tool drs uptodateness
command.
I gives the following output, not sure what "unknown invocation ID"
means. I hope someone here is able to explain..?
It's output:
> root at dc2:~# samba-tool drs uptodateness
> Unknown invocation ID 556b2cb4-e576-48e2-bb7c-7f62caee84fc
> Unknown invocation ID 7281ff0f-5af2-4ded-bdaf-362f1545d221
> Unknown invocation ID 82b24c02-16cb-4ed1-b68b-a047c26886a9
> Unknown invocation ID b97cc603-6d03-4ad0-8629-be408fed8d69
> Unknown invocation ID e50c4440-f3d2-429e-a19d-c11bc72f5565
> Unknown invocat...
2020 Nov 17
0
changes on DC not replicated, while showrepl reports no issues
Same as MJ and You.
So you have 5 DC's running.
> >>> Unknown invocation ID 556b2cb4-e576-48e2-bb7c-7f62caee84fc
> >>> Unknown invocation ID 7281ff0f-5af2-4ded-bdaf-362f1545d221
> >>> Unknown invocation ID 82b24c02-16cb-4ed1-b68b-a047c26886a9
> >>> Unknown invocation ID b97cc603-6d03-4ad0-8629-be408fed8d69
> >>> Unknown invocation ID e50c4...
2020 Nov 16
6
changes on DC not replicated, while showrepl reports no issues
Hi all,
We are running a three DC samba AD, using 4.12.8 sernet packages. Very
stable for years.
Today at 12:30 my colleague moved two users from
* CN=Users,DC=samba,DC=company,DC=com
to
* OU=disabled,DC=samba,DC=company,DC=com
This change was done on the DC4 at 12:30 using LAM (ldap-account-manager
version 7.3)
Ever since that, my automated samba-tool ldapcmp scripts started
reporting
2017 Oct 17
2
possible to use ldbedit in a safe way
...ica-Locations in object CN=84bea0a7-82dd-4237-9296-030573700698,CN=Partitions,CN=Configuration,DC=samba,DC=company,DC=com - <GUID=81a27497-bdfb-4977-9874-675bbfba490f>;<RMD_ADDTIME=130405075610000000>;<RMD_CHANGETIME=130405075610000000>;<RMD_FLAGS=0>;<RMD_INVOCID=556b2cb4-e576-48e2-bb7c-7f62caee84fc>;<RMD_LOCAL_USN=4605>;<RMD_ORIGINATING_USN=3630>;<RMD_VERSION=0>;CN=NTDS Settings,CN=DC1,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=samba,DC=company,DC=com
> In particular, I think it would be quite safe to clean up a dangling...
2017 Oct 09
4
samba getting stuck, highwatermark replication issue?
...ica-Locations in object CN=84bea0a7-82dd-4237-9296-030573700698,CN=Partitions,CN=Configuration,DC=samba,DC=company,DC=com - <GUID=81a27497-bdfb-4977-9874-675bbfba490f>;<RMD_ADDTIME=130405075610000000>;<RMD_CHANGETIME=130405075610000000>;<RMD_FLAGS=0>;<RMD_INVOCID=556b2cb4-e576-48e2-bb7c-7f62caee84fc>;<RMD_LOCAL_USN=187541>;<RMD_ORIGINATING_USN=3630>;<RMD_VERSION=0>;CN=NTDS Settings,CN=DC1,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=samba,DC=company,DC=com
> ERROR: no target object found for GUID component for msDS-NC-Replica...
2005 Aug 02
0
Festival not working with Asterisk 1.0.7_7
I've tried getting Festival working with Asterisk.
Here is what debugging from asterisk says:
-- Executing Festival("SIP/VoIP-e576", "please record your message") in new stack
== Parsing '/usr/local/etc/asterisk/festival.conf': Found
Aug 2 07:14:49 WARNING[49829]: app_festival.c:444 festival_exec: Festival returned ER
== Spawn extension (mvp-line2, 2101, 1) exited non-zero on 'SIP/VoIP-e576'...
2017 Oct 10
2
samba getting stuck, highwatermark replication issue?
...ocations in object CN=84bea0a7-82dd-4237-9296-030573700698,CN=Partitions,CN=Configuration,DC=samba,DC=merit,DC=unu,DC=edu - <GUID=81a27497-bdfb-4977-9874-675bbfba490f>;<RMD_ADDTIME=130405075610000000>;<RMD_CHANGETIME=130405075610000000>;<RMD_FLAGS=0>;<RMD_INVOCID=556b2cb4-e576-48e2-bb7c-7f62caee84fc>;<RMD_LOCAL_USN=4605>;<RMD_ORIGINATING_USN=3630>;<RMD_VERSION=0>;CN=NTDS Settings,CN=DC1,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=samba,DC=merit,DC=unu,DC=edu
> Not removing dangling forward link
> ERROR: no target object f...
2017 Oct 10
0
samba getting stuck, highwatermark replication issue?
...N=84bea0a7-82dd-4237-9296-030573700698,CN=Partitions,CN=Configuration,DC=samba,DC=merit,DC=unu,DC=edu
>> -
>> <GUID=81a27497-bdfb-4977-9874-675bbfba490f>;<RMD_ADDTIME=130405075610000000>;<RMD_CHANGETIME=130405075610000000>;<RMD_FLAGS=0>;<RMD_INVOCID=556b2cb4-e576-48e2-bb7c-7f62caee84fc>;<RMD_LOCAL_USN=4605>;<RMD_ORIGINATING_USN=3630>;<RMD_VERSION=0>;CN=NTDS
>> Settings,CN=DC1,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=samba,DC=merit,DC=unu,DC=edu
>>
>> Not removing dangling forward link
>&g...
2017 Oct 09
0
samba getting stuck, highwatermark replication issue?
...gt; CN=84bea0a7-82dd-4237-9296-030573700698,CN=Partitions,CN=Configuration,DC=samba,DC=company,DC=com
>> -
>> <GUID=81a27497-bdfb-4977-9874-675bbfba490f>;<RMD_ADDTIME=130405075610000000>;<RMD_CHANGETIME=130405075610000000>;<RMD_FLAGS=0>;<RMD_INVOCID=556b2cb4-e576-48e2-bb7c-7f62caee84fc>;<RMD_LOCAL_USN=187541>;<RMD_ORIGINATING_USN=3630>;<RMD_VERSION=0>;CN=NTDS
>> Settings,CN=DC1,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=samba,DC=company,DC=com
>>
>> ERROR: no target object found for GUID compo...
2017 Oct 17
0
possible to use ldbedit in a safe way
...ica-Locations in object CN=84bea0a7-82dd-4237-9296-030573700698,CN=Partitions,CN=Configuration,DC=samba,DC=company,DC=com - <GUID=81a27497-bdfb-4977-9874-675bbfba490f>;<RMD_ADDTIME=130405075610000000>;<RMD_CHANGETIME=130405075610000000>;<RMD_FLAGS=0>;<RMD_INVOCID=556b2cb4-e576-48e2-bb7c-7f62caee84fc>;<RMD_LOCAL_USN=4605>;<RMD_ORIGINATING_USN=3630>;<RMD_VERSION=0>;CN=NTDS Settings,CN=DC1,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=samba,DC=company,DC=com
>
>
> > In particular, I think it would be quite safe to clea...
2017 Oct 17
2
possible to use ldbedit in a safe way
On 10/16/2017 08:56 PM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> Are they breaking anything?
Not sure. But in another thread I reported some issues on replication,
highwatermark notifications, high COU load, etc.
My idea was do try several things to fix this. SO I created a
virtualised isolated environment, in which I can try out all kinds of
things:
- upgrading the DCs to 4.7 (as suggested by you)
or
-
2017 Oct 16
5
possible to use ldbedit in a safe way
On 10/16/2017 11:13 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 16:53:17 +0200
> mj via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> dbcheck tells us we have two "dangling forward links" that I am
>> trying to get rid of. On my test domain, I have simply done
>>
>> ldbedit -e nano -H