LinforPros IT Solutions
2017-Sep-28 06:20 UTC
[Samba] ldbsearch fails due to LDB_MODULES_PATH not set, is it critical for ADDC operation?
Hello, ldbsearch -H .... fails with a message that samba_dsdb is not found and LDB_MODULES_PATH needs to be set. Fixing it temporarily with: export LDB_MODULES_PATH=/usr/lib64/samba/ldb allows ldbseach command to work. Is it critical for ADDC operation though? [root at feddc ~]# rpm -q samba libldb ldb-tools samba-dc samba-4.7.0-12.fc27.x86_64 libldb-1.2.2-1.fc27.x86_64 ldb-tools-1.2.2-1.fc27.x86_64 samba-dc-4.7.0-12.fc27.x86_64 [root at feddc ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release Fedora release 27 (Twenty Seven) Thank you for looking into it Lin
Rowland Penny
2017-Sep-28 07:58 UTC
[Samba] ldbsearch fails due to LDB_MODULES_PATH not set, is it critical for ADDC operation?
On Thu, 28 Sep 2017 01:20:28 -0500 LinforPros IT Solutions via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:> Hello, > ldbsearch -H .... fails with a message that samba_dsdb > is not found and LDB_MODULES_PATH needs to be set. > > Fixing it temporarily with: > export LDB_MODULES_PATH=/usr/lib64/samba/ldb > > allows ldbseach command to work. > Is it critical for ADDC operation though? > > [root at feddc ~]# rpm -q samba libldb ldb-tools samba-dc > samba-4.7.0-12.fc27.x86_64 > libldb-1.2.2-1.fc27.x86_64 > ldb-tools-1.2.2-1.fc27.x86_64 > samba-dc-4.7.0-12.fc27.x86_64 > [root at feddc ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release > Fedora release 27 (Twenty Seven) > > > Thank you for looking into it > Lin >You are running Samba on an OS that hasn't been released yet, and 'LDB_MODULES_PATH' should be set during the package installation. It would seem you have found a bug, a Fedora bug, I would suggest you go and report it to Fedora, it has nothing to do with Samba ;-) Rowland
L.P.H. van Belle
2017-Sep-28 08:17 UTC
[Samba] ldbsearch fails due to LDB_MODULES_PATH not set, is it critical for ADDC operation?
I suggest he runs : rpm -q samba samba-* lib?db* And post that, looks to me he is missing the samba-dsdb-modules and maybe samba-vfs-modules also. But i dont know much about Fedora.. Greetz. Louis> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland Penny via samba > Verzonden: donderdag 28 september 2017 9:59 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] ldbsearch fails due to > LDB_MODULES_PATH not set, is it critical for ADDC operation? > > On Thu, 28 Sep 2017 01:20:28 -0500 > LinforPros IT Solutions via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Hello, > > ldbsearch -H .... fails with a message that samba_dsdb is not found > > and LDB_MODULES_PATH needs to be set. > > > > Fixing it temporarily with: > > export LDB_MODULES_PATH=/usr/lib64/samba/ldb > > > > allows ldbseach command to work. > > Is it critical for ADDC operation though? > > > > [root at feddc ~]# rpm -q samba libldb ldb-tools samba-dc > > samba-4.7.0-12.fc27.x86_64 > > libldb-1.2.2-1.fc27.x86_64 > > ldb-tools-1.2.2-1.fc27.x86_64 > > samba-dc-4.7.0-12.fc27.x86_64 > > [root at feddc ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release Fedora release 27 (Twenty > > Seven) > > > > > > Thank you for looking into it > > Lin > > > > You are running Samba on an OS that hasn't been released yet, > and 'LDB_MODULES_PATH' should be set during the package installation. > > It would seem you have found a bug, a Fedora bug, I would > suggest you go and report it to Fedora, it has nothing to do > with Samba ;-) > > Rowland > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba >
Rowland Penny
2017-Sep-28 08:35 UTC
[Samba] ldbsearch fails due to LDB_MODULES_PATH not set, is it critical for ADDC operation?
On Thu, 28 Sep 2017 10:17:53 +0200 "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:> I suggest he runs : > > rpm -q samba samba-* lib?db* > And post that, looks to me he is missing the samba-dsdb-modules and > maybe samba-vfs-modules also. But i dont know much about Fedora.. >I don't use Fedora either, but it is obvious this isn't a samba problem, it is either a lack of a package or a Fedora package problem. Either way, the OP should ask Fedora for help, if it is a bug they need to know. Rowland