search for: addc

...nt. Then I do the join with the second DC. The join worked fine I find the DC in the DNS I can see the account for the DC. On the second DC I see all SRV-Records for both DCs, BUT on the first DC I only see the SRV-Records for the first DC. When I check replication I see: ------------------ root at addc-01:~# samba-tool drs showrepl --summary There are failing connections Failing inbound connection: DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=example,DC=net Default-First-Site-Name\ADDC-02 via RPC DSA object GUID: 3394efb8-7f31-48f9-aa11-2791c2426be8 Last attempt @ Wed Oct 21 18:47...

Il giorno lun, 04/12/2017 alle 14.48 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto: > > > The cure is to STOP your windows clients trying to update their own > records. Yes, this is true, on windows I will stop this service. But my problem now is another The samba command samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names --fail-immediately not work It's possible to resolve this

...#39;s permission settings" appears. Access this fileserver via ALT+R > \\fileserver is required login and password and I use the admin account and always give access denied. What can I be forgetting? ------- *confs AD* *smb.conf * # Global parameters [global] netbios name = DC1 realm = ADDC.TEST.MYDOMAIN.EDU server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, drepl, winbindd, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate workgroup = ADDC server role = active directory domain controller idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes interfaces = vlan350 lo [netlogon] path = /var/lib/samba/sysvol/addc.test.mydomain.ed...

...defining block!"); in LiveIntervals::handlePhysicalRegisterDef(). The dump() of the MBB from the debugger looks like the following: entry.ifcont267_crit_edge: 0x12bc368, LLVM BB @0x12bb900, ID#2: Predecessors according to CFG: 0x12bc290 (#0) 0x12bca70 (#1) %reg1033<def> = addC %reg1025<kill>, 0, %CCFLAGS<imp-def,dead> %reg1032<def> = addC %reg1024<kill>, 0, %CCFLAGS<imp-def,dead> %reg1095<def> = addC %reg1028, 0, %CCFLAGS<imp-def> %reg1096<def> = addC %reg1029<kill>, 0, %CCFLAGS<imp-def>...

Hi, I have to add a second DC to a Zone. I use the sernet packages Version 4.11 on a debian 10 host. The bind refuses to start: root at addc-zone02:~# systemctl status bind9 ? bind9.service - BIND Domain Name Server Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/bind9.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled) Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Thu 2020-04-30 14:51:58 EEST; 5s ago Docs: man:named(8) Process: 3733 ExecStart=/usr/s...

...--all-names --fail-immediately > > > > not work > > > Following this howto, > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable#Verifying_That_the_BIND_AD_Account_Exists_for_the_DC > > I have try this: > > [ root at server-addc ~]# > LDB_MODULES_PATH=/usr/lib64/samba/ldb/ ldbsearch > -H /var/lib/samba/bind-dns/dns/sam.ldb 'cn=dns-DC1' dn # Referral > ref: ldap://dogma-to.loc/CN=Configuration,DC=dogma-to,DC=loc > > # Referral > ref: ldap://dogma-to.loc/DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=dogma-to,DC...

...nt -L $(hostname) -Uadministrator%P at aaw0rd Try add a dns record ... At this point All work fine Then I try samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names --fail-immediately And the problem persist: update failed: REFUSED Failed update with /tmp/tmpmRYs8r dic 04 15:20:21 server-addc.dogma-to.loc named[2269]: samba_dlz: starting transaction on zone dogma-to.loc dic 04 15:20:21 server-addc.dogma-to.loc named[2269]: client @0x7f06840c6f20 192.168.41.1#26896: update 'dogma-to.loc/IN' denied dic 04 15:20:21 server-addc.dogma-to.loc named[2269]: samba_dlz: cancelling...

Il giorno lun, 04/12/2017 alle 11.29 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto: > Try changing the 'options' of named.conf to this: Thanks Rowland Integrated your suggested changes and restart samba and named Now my named.conf is this[1], but none is change: [ root at server-addc ~]# samba_dnsupdate --all-names --fail-immediately update failed: REFUSED dic 04 12:46:43 server-addc.dogma-to.loc named[8474]: samba_dlz: spnego update failed dic 04 12:46:43 server-addc.dogma-to.loc named[8474]: client @0x7fc9310a5e80 192.168.41.1#60981/key SERVER-ADDC\$\@DOGMA-...

...vate/ -d drwxr-x---. 8 root named 4096 26 apr 00.48 /var/lib/samba/private/ Solution 4: I have remove symbolic link and copy the samba krb5.conf directly to /etc Now, after this change the dhcp script work, can add the new DNS record A and bind the new name to assigned IP. apr 26 00:58:21 fedora-addc.solinos.loc dhcpd[1499]: Commit: IP: 10.11.12.100 DHCID: 1:52:54:0:93:83:52 Name: centos7 apr 26 00:58:21 fedora-addc.solinos.loc dhcpd[1499]: execute_statement argv[0] = /etc/samba/bin/dhcp-dyndns.sh apr 26 00:58:21 fedora-addc.solinos.loc dhcpd[1499]: execute_statement argv[1] = add apr 26 00:58:...

...in LiveIntervals::handlePhysicalRegisterDef(). > > The dump() of the MBB from the debugger looks like the following: > > entry.ifcont267_crit_edge: 0x12bc368, LLVM BB @0x12bb900, ID#2: > Predecessors according to CFG: 0x12bc290 (#0) 0x12bca70 (#1) > %reg1033<def> = addC %reg1025<kill>, 0, %CCFLAGS<imp-def,dead> > %reg1032<def> = addC %reg1024<kill>, 0, %CCFLAGS<imp-def,dead> > %reg1095<def> = addC %reg1028, 0, %CCFLAGS<imp-def> > %reg1096<def> = addC %reg1029<kill>, 0, %CCFLAGS<...

...command > > samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names --fail-immediately > > not work Following this howto, https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable#Verifying_That_the_BIND_AD_Account_Exists_for_the_DC I have try this: [ root at server-addc ~]# LDB_MODULES_PATH=/usr/lib64/samba/ldb/ ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/bind-dns/dns/sam.ldb 'cn=dns-DC1' dn # Referral ref: ldap://dogma-to.loc/CN=Configuration,DC=dogma-to,DC=loc # Referral ref: ldap://dogma-to.loc/DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=dogma-to,DC=loc # Referral...

Hello, If my AD will only provide service for machines with windows operating system I can use the *idmap config ADDC: backend = ad*, correct or did I get it all wrong? For both unix and windows machines I need *idmap config ADDC: backend = rid* ? Other question. *Wiki Prerequisites says:* "Users must have at least the uidNumber and groups the gidNumber attribute set. When using the rfc2307 winbind NSS inf...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I try to set up a ADDC with bind9 and dhcp-Server for dynamic DNS-updates. I followd the wiki: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_DHCP_to_update_DNS_records_wi th_BIND9 My problem is, that the PTR Record will not be updated, because the script is using the wrong reverse-zone: - --------------------- Dez 26 17:30...

Thanks for the tip. I have still "zone has no NS records" This is the output (anonymized) of the script -- sorry, I will post it directly next time ;) Collected config? --- 2020-04-30-15:25 ----------- Hostname: addc-jor02 DNS Domain: example.com FQDN: addc-jor02.example.com ipaddress: 192.168.40.24 ----------- Kerberos SRV _kerberos._tcp.example.com record verified ok, sample output: Server:??? ??? 192.168.168.48 Address:??? 192.168.168.48#53 _kerberos._tcp.example.com ?? service = 0 100 88 addc-ho-1.exampl...

...r 2017 14:07:05 +0200 > Dario Lesca via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > I have setup a new Samba Active Directory DC on Fedora 25 and > > samba- > > 4.5.8-1.fc25.x86_64, rebuild from src.rpm with dc option enable. > > > > This system (fedora-addc) is only an AD-DC. In the next days I will > > deploy another Centos 7 samba member server with standard samba- > > 4.4.4 > > rpm (without dc enabled) and join it to Fedora AD-DC for manage > > data > > users. > >   > > After install bind dns and samba new...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello everybody, since the patch for all the badlock bugs it is not possible to access a Samba 4 ADDC-database with ldb-tools. Everytime I try it, I get the following error: root at addc-02:~# ldbsearch -H ldaps://addc-02.example2.net -U administrat or TLS failed to missing crlfile - with 'tls verify peer = as_strict_as_possible' When I add: - ---------------------- tls verify peer = no_...

...; But anyway still showing bad UIDs. > > Here we show how both configurations are actualemente. > > Within RSAT I can place the UID attribute for example uanaco. > > AD Domain Controller > > wbinfo --user-info = uanaco > KENNEDY \ uanaco: *: 3000783: 100: uanaco: / home / ADDC / uanaco: / > bin / false > > RSAT changed by UID 1111 > > wbinfo --user-info = uanaco > ADDC \ uanaco: *: 1111: 100: uanaco: / home / ADDC / uanaco: / bin / false > > member Server > > wbinfo --user-info = uanaco > uanaco: *: 100642: 100008: uanaco: / home / ADDC...

Legalizer will expand arithmetics using addc and adde. Is it not working for you? It works fine on x86, you can take a look how it's done. Evan On Sep 8, 2008, at 4:03 AM, Richard Pennington wrote: > My target doesn't support 64 bit arithmetic, so I'd like to supply > definitions for adde/addc. The problem is I can...

...dns record ... > > At this point All work fine > > Then I try > > samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names --fail-immediately > > And the problem persist: > > update failed: REFUSED > Failed update with /tmp/tmpmRYs8r > dic 04 15:20:21 server-addc.dogma-to.loc named[2269]: samba_dlz: > starting transaction on zone dogma-to.loc dic 04 15:20:21 > server-addc.dogma-to.loc named[2269]: client @0x7f06840c6f20 > 192.168.41.1#26896: update 'dogma-to.loc/IN' denied dic 04 15:20:21 > server-addc.dogma-to.loc named[2269]: samba_dlz...

On 5/30/2018 10:29 AM, Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev wrote: > For targets where ADDCARRY and SUBCARRY are legal, would it make sense > to expand ADDC/UADDO/ADDE/etc. into ADDCARRY (and same for sub)? SelectionDAG will never generate ADDC/ADDE on targets where they aren't legal.  Targets which custom-lower ADDCARRY generally also custom-lower UADDO; not sure what sort of...