search for: due

...cending order from 808 to 3305, then it goes back to 3259 and eventually it matches the wrong instruction. Why did go back from 3305 to 3259? In my XXXGenDAGISel.inc, I can see that the correct instruction is at index 3420 but it never got there. ISEL: Starting pattern match Skipped scope entry (due to false predicate) at index 3, continuing at 808 Skipped scope entry (due to false predicate) at index 809, continuing at 865 Skipped scope entry (due to false predicate) at index 867, continuing at 1091 Skipped scope entry (due to false predicate) at index 1093, continuing at 1578 Skipped...

...([65 x i32]* @c to <64 x i32>*)](align=16)(tbaa=<0x3817578>)> t8, t7, t11, undef:i64 ISEL: Starting pattern match on root node: t9: ch = store<ST256[bitcast ([65 x i32]* @c to <64 x i32>*)](align=16)(tbaa=<0x3817578>)> t8, t7, t11, undef:i64 Skipped scope entry (due to false predicate) at index 14, continuing at 81 Skipped scope entry (due to false predicate) at index 82, continuing at 149 Skipped scope entry (due to false predicate) at index 150, continuing at 217 Skipped scope entry (due to false predicate) at index 218, continuing at 267 Skipped sco...

...>>>> >>>> ISEL: Starting pattern match on root node: t9: ch = store<ST256[bitcast >>>> ([65 x i32]* @c to <64 x i32>*)](align=16)(tbaa=<0x3817578>)> t8, t7, >>>> t11, undef:i64 >>>> >>>> Skipped scope entry (due to false predicate) at index 14, continuing >>>> at 81 >>>> Skipped scope entry (due to false predicate) at index 82, continuing >>>> at 149 >>>> Skipped scope entry (due to false predicate) at index 150, continuing >>>> at 217 >&gt...

...;> >> Error: Primary decode conflict: VADD_256B would overwrite INC8r >> ModRM 192 >> Opcode 254 >> Context IC >> Error: Primary decode conflict: VADD_256B would overwrite INC8r >> ModRM 193 >> Opcode 254 >> Context IC >> >> Is it due to opcode conflict? what should i keep opcode then? >> >> >> On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Keep I >>> >>> ~Craig >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 10:28 PM, ham...

...=============== Selecting: 0x2ebfa78: glue = EsenciaISD::SET_FLAG 0x2ebee18, 0x2ebef20, 0x2ebf658 [ORD=3] [ID=11] ISEL: Starting pattern match on root node: 0x2ebfa78: glue = EsenciaISD::SET_FLAG 0x2ebee18, 0x2ebef20, 0x2ebf658 [ORD=3] [ID=11] Initial Opcode index to 258 Skipped scope entry (due to false predicate) at index 278, continuing at 292 Skipped scope entry (due to false predicate) at index 293, continuing at 307 Skipped scope entry (due to false predicate) at index 308, continuing at 322 Skipped scope entry (due to false predicate) at index 323, continuing at 337 Skipped...

...80 [ID=11] 0x17f7380: ch = BasicBlock<if.then 0x17f1e58> [ID=6] 0x17f7480: ch = br 0x17f7280, 0x17f7380 [ID=12] ===== Instruction selection begins: BB#0 'entry' ISEL: Starting pattern match on root node: 0x17f7480: ch = br 0x17f7280, 0x17f7380 [ID=12] Skipped scope entry (due to false predicate) at index 2, continuing at 59 Skipped scope entry (due to false predicate) at index 61, continuing at 219 Skipped scope entry (due to false predicate) at index 220, continuing at 261 Skipped scope entry (due to false predicate) at index 262, continuing at 303 Skipped scop...

Have you read http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMBackend.html and http://llvm.org/docs/CodeGenerator.html ? http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMBackend.html#instruction-selector describes how to define a store instruction. -Eli On 7/6/2017 6:51 PM, hameeza ahmed via llvm-dev wrote: > Please correct me i m stuck at this point. > > On Jul 6, 2017 5:18 PM, "hameeza ahmed"

also i further run the following command; llc -debug filer-knl_o3.ll and its output is attached here. by looking at the output can we say that legalization runs fine and the error is due to instruction selection/ pattern matching which is not yet implemented? so do i need to worry and try to correct it at this stage or should i move forward to implement instruction selection/ pattern matching? Please guide me. Thank You On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 8:00 AM, hameeza ahmed <hahmed23...

...since August, do not is a problem, but my i see this messages logs every 1 minutes, any ideas? Dec 7 10:40:24 dc-linux samba[4912]: [2015/12/07 10:40:24.260707, 0] ../auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_sign.c:236(ntlmssp_check_packet) Dec 7 10:40:24 dc-linux samba[4912]: NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid signature! Dec 7 10:40:24 dc-linux samba[4912]: [2015/12/07 10:40:24.280740, 0] ../auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_sign.c:236(ntlmssp_check_packet) Dec 7 10:40:24 dc-linux samba[4912]: NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid signature! Thanks!

...ldtime = yes monitor-format = wav ringinuse = no I am using AddQueueMember to add SIP interface to the queue. Each sip interface is member of multiple queues. Occasionally I get messages like [Mar 17 11:33:01] ERROR[9253]: chan_sip.c:3232 update_call_counter: Call to peer '2505' rejected due to usage limit of 1 [Mar 17 11:33:01] ERROR[9254]: chan_sip.c:3232 update_call_counter: Call to peer '2509' rejected due to usage limit of 1 [Mar 17 11:33:01] ERROR[9255]: chan_sip.c:3232 update_call_counter: Call to peer '2502' rejected due to usage limit of 1 [Mar 17 11:33:01] ERR...

...nar kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] CDB: Write(10): 2a 00 06 db 70 78 00 00 38 00 Feb 29 08:23:56 achernar kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 115044472 Feb 29 08:23:56 achernar kernel: Buffer I/O error on device dm-0, logical block 14252047 Feb 29 08:23:56 achernar kernel: lost page write due to I/O error on dm-0 Feb 29 08:23:56 achernar kernel: Buffer I/O error on device dm-0, logical block 14252048 Feb 29 08:23:56 achernar kernel: lost page write due to I/O error on dm-0 Feb 29 08:23:56 achernar kernel: Buffer I/O error on device dm-0, logical block 14252049 Feb 29 08:23:56 achernar...

I have a simple worker that I set up with repeat_every: class DueNoteQueuerWorker < BackgrounDRb::Rails repeat_every 1.minutes first_run Time.now def do_work(args) @logger.debug("Sending due notes. The current time is #{Time.now}") end end I want this to run every minute, all the time. The first run is fine, but it seems that...

Hi, I have a IAX2 trunk between two sites (connected with an high bandwidth link) but sometime/often I get: chan_iax2.c: Auto-congesting call due to slow response and call is dropped (and routed on a PSTN link). In iax.conf, I have: [iax-out] username=iax-in type=peer trunk=yes secret=xxxxxxxxxxx qualify=yes host=xxx.yyy.zzz.32 auth=md5 Any idea? Perpaphs is due to 'qualify=yes'... Thanks -- Domenico Viggiani

...=============== Selecting: 0x2ebfa78: glue = EsenciaISD::SET_FLAG 0x2ebee18, 0x2ebef20, 0x2ebf658 [ORD=3] [ID=11] ISEL: Starting pattern match on root node: 0x2ebfa78: glue = EsenciaISD::SET_FLAG 0x2ebee18, 0x2ebef20, 0x2ebf658 [ORD=3] [ID=11] Initial Opcode index to 258 Skipped scope entry (due to false predicate) at index 278, continuing at 292 Skipped scope entry (due to false predicate) at index 293, continuing at 307 Skipped scope entry (due to false predicate) at index 308, continuing at 322 Skipped scope entry (due to false predicate) at index 323, continuing at 337 Skipped...

...> >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Carlos A. P. >> Cunha >> Verzonden: woensdag 9 december 2015 13:13 >> Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to invalid >> signature >> >> Hi! >> any ideas? >> >> >> Em 07-12-2015 10:56, Carlos A. P. Cunha escreveu: >>> HI! >>> My server Samba 4 version 4.3.0, running since August, do not is a >>> problem, but my i see this messages logs...

Several bugs are present in R-2.15.3 and R-alpha due to naive copying of list elements. The bug below is due to naive copying in subset.c (with similar bugs for matrices and arrays): a<-list(c(1,2),c(3,4),c(5,6)) b<-a[2:3] a[[2]][2]<-9 print(b[[1]][2]) Naive copying in mapply.c leads to the following bug: X<-1+1 f<-function(a,b) X...

...rameworks/R.framework/Versions/4.2/Resources/library/Rcpp/include/RcppCommon.h:168: /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/4.2/Resources/library/Rcpp/include/Rcpp/internal/r_coerce.h:255:7: warning: 'sprintf' is deprecated: This function is provided for compatibility reasons only. Due to security concerns inherent in the design of sprintf(3), it is highly recommended that you use snprintf(3) instead. [-Wdeprecated-declarations] ::sprintf(buff, "%02x", from); ^ /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX.sdk/usr/include/stdio.h:188:1: note: 'sprintf...

...t----- >>>> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Carlos A. P. >>>> Cunha >>>> Verzonden: woensdag 9 december 2015 13:13 >>>> Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >>>> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] NTLMSSP NTLM2 packet check failed due to >>>> invalid >>>> signature >>>> >>>> Hi! >>>> any ideas? >>>> >>>> >>>> Em 07-12-2015 10:56, Carlos A. P. Cunha escreveu: >>>>> HI! >>>>> My server Samba 4 version 4.3....

...tion failed # LOG WINBIND ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------- [2016/09/29 09:37:46.941460, 1] ../source3/libads/ldap_utils. c:91(ads_do_search_retry_internal) Reducing LDAP page size from 1000 to 500 due to IO_TIMEOUT [2016/09/29 11:07:58.809921, 1] ../source3/libads/ldap_utils. c:91(ads_do_search_retry_internal) Reducing LDAP page size from 500 to 250 due to IO_TIMEOUT [2016/09/29 13:32:16.102572, 1] ../source3/libads/ldap_utils. c:91(ads_do_search_retry_internal) Reducing LDAP page size fro...

...C == CallingConv::HiPE) > return true; > return false; > } > > Any other suggestions are always welcomed. Why aren’t checking for the presence of a tail call? — Mehdi > > and I am checking this condition along with hasLocalLinkage() and hasAddressTaken(). > > Due to this test-suite now has only 2 runtime failure where as before this there were around 43 due to local function related optimization. But of course by giving preference to tail call many opportunities to optimize IPRA is missed. > > The 2 existing failure are interesting and hard to debug,...