Hello man, Samba is not Linix, samba is a project by free license. Linux is a S/O too free license and not service, the samba is a software with source code open, the windows AD code probabely content code like a samba before the AD code is not open and anyone developer or enginear cold be use the code and logic in the code. Linux = S/O Samba is not Linux, samba is Free... But i have the philosophy, i use what works. 2016-09-27 17:37 GMT-03:00 Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>:> > Am 27.09.2016 um 21:02 schrieb Gilberto Nunes via samba: > >> I am sad, today! I start to study how windows deal with CIFS, Active >> Directory and DFS, I just decide follow the other path! >> I will give a try to windows tools.... >> The question is: why Linux doesn t have such tools to help and improve >> server deployments?!? >> Everything will be easier than go to linux console and try and try and try >> and nothing happen! >> > > when you don't like a console maybe linux is not your OS > on windows a feel pure hate because there is no useable console > > So, for now on, I will use Windows tool in my servers... >> I know many of you guys, just love Linux... I also love Linux, but came >> on! >> We have a hard way to do thing works properly... >> >> In Windows everything is just forward straight ahead..... >> > > if "it magically works without any control" is good enough for you maybe > windows is the right thing - when i look at a simple windows 10 > installation that needs as much storage as most of our servers together for > just have a edge-browser and nothing else - well, i could puke and i had > enough of any windows installation around 10 years ago > > yes it was a hard way, it took time, it took try out many things - but > compared to a server which acts like a blackbox - fine if it's good enough > for you - before i ever in my live setup a windows machine (and the same > for apple) i just leave the IT as a whole,,,, > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba >-- Atenciosamente, Rodrigo da Silva Cunha
Am 27.09.2016 um 23:04 schrieb Rodrigo Cunha:> Hello man, Samba is not Linix, samba is a project by free license. > Linux is a S/O too free license and not service, the samba is a software > with source code open, the windows AD code probabely content code like a > samba before the AD code is not open and anyone developer or enginear > cold be use the code and logic in the code. > Linux = S/O > Samba is not Linux, samba is Free...and linux is not?> But i have the philosophy, i use what works.i see, hence your other statements :-) don't get me wrong but i don't need any education what linux is (at least not from someone who converts a plaintext mail to HTML and responds without sensible quoting), i just referred to the OP and from the management part it's not much difference if you have a shell on Linux, some BSD or even a Apple machine (apple to some degree) unix/linux is user friendly, it's just selective who it's friends are :-)> 2016-09-27 17:37 GMT-03:00 Reindl Harald via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>>: > > > Am 27.09.2016 um 21:02 schrieb Gilberto Nunes via samba: > > I am sad, today! I start to study how windows deal with CIFS, Active > Directory and DFS, I just decide follow the other path! > I will give a try to windows tools.... > The question is: why Linux doesn t have such tools to help and > improve > server deployments?!? > Everything will be easier than go to linux console and try and > try and try > and nothing happen! > > > when you don't like a console maybe linux is not your OS > on windows a feel pure hate because there is no useable console > > So, for now on, I will use Windows tool in my servers... > I know many of you guys, just love Linux... I also love Linux, > but came on! > We have a hard way to do thing works properly... > > In Windows everything is just forward straight ahead..... > > > if "it magically works without any control" is good enough for you > maybe windows is the right thing - when i look at a simple windows > 10 installation that needs as much storage as most of our servers > together for just have a edge-browser and nothing else - well, i > could puke and i had enough of any windows installation around 10 > years ago > > yes it was a hard way, it took time, it took try out many things - > but compared to a server which acts like a blackbox - fine if it's > good enough for you - before i ever in my live setup a windows > machine (and the same for apple) i just leave the IT as a whole,,,,
On 09/27/2016 05:16 PM, Reindl Harald via samba wrote:> unix/linux is user friendly, it's just selective who it's friends are :-)yep All these IT guys and gals have been spoiled by taking Microsoft Certifications, where everything's laid out for you in a pretty GUI, and you never really understand what's going on behind the code, because it's not shared. I was there, and many on the mailing list were there, but we chose to learning something new. I love Linux desktop! I'll never go back to Windows. Windows 10? What's that? It's an attempt by Microsoft to retain the customers they royally upset when they discontinued Windows XP, and make money by service. It's another way to trap their customers into continuing to install and license Windows products. It's not for me.