Jeff Sadowski
2016-May-27 16:11 UTC
[Samba] ISC's dhcp server, radvd and bind9 now adding samba as an AD DC
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_BIND_as_backend_for_Samba_AD helped me find that I needed to add options { [...] tkey-gssapi-keytab "/usr/local/samba/private/dns.keytab"; [...] }; That seems to have fixed my errors with DNS On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote:> On 27/05/16 14:37, Jeff Sadowski wrote: > >> I had left my config alone for now and dhcp still writes to >> DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD. But samba has been complaining about not being >> able >> to write to bind in its zone. >> >> [2016/05/27 07:30:06.738434, 0] >> ../source4/dsdb/dns/dns_update.c:295(dnsupdate_nameupdate_done) >> ../source4/dsdb/dns/dns_update.c:295: Failed DNS update - >> NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL >> >> If you are right about it using kerberos I think I am missing a bit more >> configuration to allow bind to use kerberos. I have a place for it to use >> the key but nothing in it about kerberos and how to verify that. >> >> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:35 AM, mathias dufresne <infractory at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hi, >>> >>> Why modifying a working conf when you can build your DC on others systems >>> (VM)? That could be really nice to learn but you add a lot of complexity >>> in >>> your process, I think. >>> Why not using DLZ to access your AD zones? I expect Bind to be able to >>> mix >>> its behaviour: flat file for some zone, DLZ for others... >>> >>> Now regarding: >>> update-policy { >>> grant AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD ms-self * A AAAA; >>> grant Administrator at AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD wildcard >>> * A >>> AAAA SRV CNAME; >>> grant DOMAIN2$@ad.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD wildcard * A >>> AAAA >>> SRV CNAME; >>> }; >>> For me this means: >>> grant AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD ms-self * A AAAA; >>> Grant any authenticated user (from domain AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD) to >>> modify A and AAAA it owns (ms-self) from any host (*). >>> >>> grant Administrator at AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD wildcard * A AAAA SRV >>> CNAME; >>> Grant administrator from domain AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD to do anything >>> on >>> any A AAAA SRV CNAME from any host >>> >>> same for last one. >>> >>> I'm really a new comer to DNS world, these thoughts come from >>> http://docstore.mik.ua/orelly/networking_2ndEd/dns/ch10_02.htm >>> >>> These lines should make your Bind to use Kerberos. At least I do hope the >>> authentication is Kerberos (that's AD!). If it is kerberos >>> authentication, >>> I expect you can rely on it as almost the whole world rely on Kerberos >>> these days : ) >>> >>> A last thing regarding ISC's key method: >>> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11520 >>> I don't meant this bug as something to do with what you want to achieve, >>> simply it could be a good thing to read if you understand anything to >>> ISC's >>> key method (that I don't), perhaps you could find some leads to follow or >>> some information to avoid that configuration. >>> >>> Sorry not to help more. Have a nice day, >>> >>> mathias >>> >>> >>> >>> 2016-05-18 18:13 GMT+02:00 Jeff Sadowski <jeff.sadowski at gmail.com>: >>> >>> So I had dhcp, radvd and bind working together nicely and now I threw in >>>> a >>>> wrench of setting up an AD DC >>>> >>>> I want to change my dhcp server setting to put client's into the new AD >>>> Domain but am a little hesitant as it is all working so nicely with DDNS >>>> >>>> I'm starting to think all I need to do is edit just my dhcpd.conf and >>>> change occurrences of DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD to AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD >>>> A little touch up of db.self and comment out and eventually remove >>>> DOMAIN1 >>>> entries as everything is working as I like. >>>> >>>> My concern is moving from >>>> allow-update { key rndc-key; }; >>>> notify yes; >>>> to >>>> update-policy { >>>> grant AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD ms-self * A AAAA; >>>> grant Administrator at AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD wildcard >>>> * A >>>> AAAA SRV CNAME; >>>> grant DOMAIN2$@ad.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD wildcard * A >>>> AAAA >>>> SRV CNAME; >>>> }; >>>> >>>> The latter being produced when I created the domain in the example >>>> configs >>>> that I copied into mine. >>>> I think what that is saying is let the domain controller by name have >>>> access to the domain's entries >>>> I'm a little concerned about verification as I know the key method is >>>> safe >>>> and I'm not so sure about the grant method. >>>> >>>> Is there a way to have samba use ISC's key method? >>>> Anyone have any suggestions? >>>> >>>> My current setup is as below. >>>> >>>> My server name is the same as DOMAIN2 it has a ipv4 address of >>>> 192.168.1.1 >>>> and a ipv6 address of fc00:1::1111:1111:1111:1111 >>>> It's outside addresses are dhcp from my ISP I do ip masquerade on both >>>> ipv4 >>>> and ipv6 >>>> >>>> >>>> My dhcpd.conf looks as follows >>>> #================START======================>>>> ddns-updates on; >>>> ddns-update-style interim; >>>> ddns-domainname "DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD."; >>>> ddns-rev-domainname "in-addr.arpa."; >>>> ignore client-updates; >>>> option domain-search-order code 119 = string; >>>> include "/etc/rndc.key"; >>>> zone DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD { >>>> primary 192.168.1.1; >>>> key rndc-key; >>>> } >>>> zone 1.168.192.in-addr.arpa. { >>>> primary 192.168.1.1; >>>> key rndc-key; >>>> } >>>> default-lease-time 100000; >>>> max-lease-time 1000000; >>>> subnet 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { >>>> range 192.168.1.10 192.168.1.200; >>>> option routers 192.168.1.1; >>>> option domain-name "DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD."; >>>> option domain-name-servers 192.168.1.1; >>>> option domain-search-order >>>> "DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD.,ipv6.DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD."; >>>> next-server 192.168.1.1; >>>> filename "/pxelinux.0"; >>>> allow unknown-clients; >>>> } >>>> #================END========================>>>> >>>> My radvd.conf looks like so >>>> #================START======================>>>> interface eth0 >>>> { >>>> AdvSendAdvert on; >>>> prefix fc00:1::/64 >>>> { >>>> AdvOnLink on; >>>> AdvAutonomous on; >>>> }; >>>> RDNSS fc00:1::1111:1111:1111:1111 {}; >>>> }; >>>> #================END========================>>>> >>>> My named.conf after adding my samba looks like so >>>> #================START======================>>>> options { >>>> listen-on port 53 { 127.0.0.1; 192.168.1.1; }; >>>> listen-on-v6 port 53 { ::1; }; >>>> directory "/var/named"; >>>> dump-file "/var/named/data/cache_dump.db"; >>>> statistics-file "/var/named/data/named_stats.txt"; >>>> memstatistics-file "/var/named/data/named_mem_stats.txt"; >>>> allow-query { localhost; 192.168.1.0/16; }; >>>> recursion yes; >>>> dnssec-enable yes; >>>> dnssec-validation yes; >>>> dnssec-lookaside auto; >>>> bindkeys-file "/etc/named.iscdlv.key"; >>>> managed-keys-directory "/var/named/dynamic"; >>>> pid-file "/run/named/named.pid"; >>>> session-keyfile "/run/named/session.key"; >>>> }; >>>> logging { >>>> channel default_debug { >>>> file "data/named.run"; >>>> severity dynamic; >>>> }; >>>> }; >>>> zone "." IN { >>>> type hint; >>>> file "named.ca"; >>>> }; >>>> zone "ipv6.DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD" { >>>> type master; >>>> file "zones/db.ipv6.DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD"; >>>> allow-update { key rndc-key; }; >>>> notify yes; >>>> }; >>>> zone "DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD" IN { >>>> type master; >>>> file "zones/db.DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD"; >>>> allow-update { key rndc-key; }; >>>> notify yes; >>>> }; >>>> zone "ad.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD." IN { >>>> type master; >>>> file "zones/db.ad.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD"; >>>> update-policy { >>>> grant AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD ms-self * A AAAA; >>>> grant Administrator at AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD wildcard >>>> * A >>>> AAAA SRV CNAME; >>>> grant DOMAIN2$@ad.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD wildcard * A >>>> AAAA >>>> SRV CNAME; >>>> }; >>>> check-names ignore; >>>> }; >>>> zone "DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD" IN { type master; file "db.self"; }; >>>> #================END========================>>>> >>>> content of db.self >>>> #================START======================>>>> $TTL 604800 ; 1 week >>>> @ IN SOA ns.DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD MY.EMAIL. ( >>>> 2014092401 ; serial >>>> 604800 ; refresh (1 week) >>>> 86400 ; retry (1 day) >>>> 2419200 ; expire (4 weeks) >>>> 604800 ; minimum (1 week) >>>> ) >>>> NS ns.DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD. >>>> @ IN A 192.168.1.252 >>>> @ IN MX 10 DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD. >>>> @ IN TXT "v=spf1 mx a -all" >>>> #================END========================>>>> >>>> my smb.conf looks like >>>> #================START======================>>>> [global] >>>> netbios name = DOMAIN2 >>>> realm = AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD >>>> server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, >>>> drepl, >>>> winbindd, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate >>>> workgroup = AD >>>> server role = active directory domain controller >>>> idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes >>>> [netlogon] >>>> path = /var/lib/samba/sysvol/ad.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD/scripts >>>> read only = No >>>> [sysvol] >>>> path = /var/lib/samba/sysvol >>>> read only = No >>>> #================END========================>>>> >>>> >>>> my krb5.conf looks like >>>> #================START======================>>>> [libdefaults] >>>> default_realm = AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD >>>> dns_lookup_realm = false >>>> dns_lookup_kdc = true >>>> #================END========================>>>> -- >>>> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the >>>> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba >>>> >>>> >>> > You are going about this the wrong way, you do not setup dhcp and bind > then add a Samba4 AD DC, you setup the AD DC with bind9 and then add the > dhcp server. > >Your right now I will try adding dhcp to that same rule set> Rowland > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba >
Rowland penny
2016-May-27 16:23 UTC
[Samba] ISC's dhcp server, radvd and bind9 now adding samba as an AD DC
On 27/05/16 17:11, Jeff Sadowski wrote:> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_BIND_as_backend_for_Samba_AD helped > me find that I needed to add > > options { > [...] > tkey-gssapi-keytab "/usr/local/samba/private/dns.keytab"; > [...] > }; > That seems to have fixed my errors with DNS > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org > <mailto:rpenny at samba.org>> wrote: > > On 27/05/16 14:37, Jeff Sadowski wrote: > > I had left my config alone for now and dhcp still writes to > DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD. But samba has been complaining about > not being able > to write to bind in its zone. > > [2016/05/27 07:30:06.738434, 0] > ../source4/dsdb/dns/dns_update.c:295(dnsupdate_nameupdate_done) > ../source4/dsdb/dns/dns_update.c:295: Failed DNS update - > NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL > > If you are right about it using kerberos I think I am missing > a bit more > configuration to allow bind to use kerberos. I have a place > for it to use > the key but nothing in it about kerberos and how to verify that. > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:35 AM, mathias dufresne > <infractory at gmail.com <mailto:infractory at gmail.com>> > wrote: > > Hi, > > Why modifying a working conf when you can build your DC on > others systems > (VM)? That could be really nice to learn but you add a lot > of complexity in > your process, I think. > Why not using DLZ to access your AD zones? I expect Bind > to be able to mix > its behaviour: flat file for some zone, DLZ for others... > > Now regarding: > update-policy { > grant AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD ms-self * > A AAAA; > grant > Administrator at AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD wildcard * A > AAAA SRV CNAME; > grant DOMAIN2$@ad.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD > wildcard * A AAAA > SRV CNAME; > }; > For me this means: > grant AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD ms-self * A AAAA; > Grant any authenticated user (from domain > AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD) to > modify A and AAAA it owns (ms-self) from any host (*). > > grant Administrator at AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD wildcard * A > AAAA SRV CNAME; > Grant administrator from domain AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD > to do anything on > any A AAAA SRV CNAME from any host > > same for last one. > > I'm really a new comer to DNS world, these thoughts come from > http://docstore.mik.ua/orelly/networking_2ndEd/dns/ch10_02.htm > > These lines should make your Bind to use Kerberos. At > least I do hope the > authentication is Kerberos (that's AD!). If it is kerberos > authentication, > I expect you can rely on it as almost the whole world rely > on Kerberos > these days : ) > > A last thing regarding ISC's key method: > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11520 > I don't meant this bug as something to do with what you > want to achieve, > simply it could be a good thing to read if you understand > anything to ISC's > key method (that I don't), perhaps you could find some > leads to follow or > some information to avoid that configuration. > > Sorry not to help more. Have a nice day, > > mathias > > > > 2016-05-18 18:13 GMT+02:00 Jeff Sadowski > <jeff.sadowski at gmail.com <mailto:jeff.sadowski at gmail.com>>: > > So I had dhcp, radvd and bind working together nicely > and now I threw in a > wrench of setting up an AD DC > > I want to change my dhcp server setting to put > client's into the new AD > Domain but am a little hesitant as it is all working > so nicely with DDNS > > I'm starting to think all I need to do is edit just my > dhcpd.conf and > change occurrences of DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD to > AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD > A little touch up of db.self and comment out and > eventually remove DOMAIN1 > entries as everything is working as I like. > > My concern is moving from > allow-update { key rndc-key; }; > notify yes; > to > update-policy { > grant AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD > ms-self * A AAAA; > grant > Administrator at AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD wildcard * A > AAAA SRV CNAME; > grant > DOMAIN2$@ad.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD wildcard * A AAAA > SRV CNAME; > }; > > The latter being produced when I created the domain in > the example configs > that I copied into mine. > I think what that is saying is let the domain > controller by name have > access to the domain's entries > I'm a little concerned about verification as I know > the key method is safe > and I'm not so sure about the grant method. > > Is there a way to have samba use ISC's key method? > Anyone have any suggestions? > > My current setup is as below. > > My server name is the same as DOMAIN2 it has a ipv4 > address of 192.168.1.1 > and a ipv6 address of fc00:1::1111:1111:1111:1111 > It's outside addresses are dhcp from my ISP I do ip > masquerade on both > ipv4 > and ipv6 > > > My dhcpd.conf looks as follows > #================START======================> ddns-updates on; > ddns-update-style interim; > ddns-domainname "DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD."; > ddns-rev-domainname "in-addr.arpa."; > ignore client-updates; > option domain-search-order code 119 = string; > include "/etc/rndc.key"; > zone DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD { > primary 192.168.1.1; > key rndc-key; > } > zone 1.168.192.in-addr.arpa. { > primary 192.168.1.1; > key rndc-key; > } > default-lease-time 100000; > max-lease-time 1000000; > subnet 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { > range 192.168.1.10 192.168.1.200; > option routers 192.168.1.1; > option domain-name "DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD."; > option domain-name-servers 192.168.1.1; > option domain-search-order > "DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD.,ipv6.DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD."; > next-server 192.168.1.1; > filename "/pxelinux.0"; > allow unknown-clients; > } > #================END========================> > My radvd.conf looks like so > #================START======================> interface eth0 > { > AdvSendAdvert on; > prefix fc00:1::/64 > { > AdvOnLink on; > AdvAutonomous on; > }; > RDNSS fc00:1::1111:1111:1111:1111 {}; > }; > #================END========================> > My named.conf after adding my samba looks like so > #================START======================> options { > listen-on port 53 { 127.0.0.1; 192.168.1.1; }; > listen-on-v6 port 53 { ::1; }; > directory "/var/named"; > dump-file "/var/named/data/cache_dump.db"; > statistics-file > "/var/named/data/named_stats.txt"; > memstatistics-file > "/var/named/data/named_mem_stats.txt"; > allow-query { localhost; 192.168.1.0/16 > <http://192.168.1.0/16>; }; > recursion yes; > dnssec-enable yes; > dnssec-validation yes; > dnssec-lookaside auto; > bindkeys-file "/etc/named.iscdlv.key"; > managed-keys-directory "/var/named/dynamic"; > pid-file "/run/named/named.pid"; > session-keyfile "/run/named/session.key"; > }; > logging { > channel default_debug { > file "data/named.run"; > severity dynamic; > }; > }; > zone "." IN { > type hint; > file "named.ca <http://named.ca>"; > }; > zone "ipv6.DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD" { > type master; > file "zones/db.ipv6.DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD"; > allow-update { key rndc-key; }; > notify yes; > }; > zone "DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD" IN { > type master; > file "zones/db.DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD"; > allow-update { key rndc-key; }; > notify yes; > }; > zone "ad.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD." IN { > type master; > file "zones/db.ad.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD"; > update-policy { > grant AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD > ms-self * A AAAA; > grant > Administrator at AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD wildcard * A > AAAA SRV CNAME; > grant > DOMAIN2$@ad.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD wildcard * A AAAA > SRV CNAME; > }; > check-names ignore; > }; > zone "DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD" IN { type master; file > "db.self"; }; > #================END========================> > content of db.self > #================START======================> $TTL 604800 ; 1 week > @ IN SOA ns.DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD MY.EMAIL. ( > 2014092401 <tel:2014092401> ; serial > 604800 ; refresh > (1 week) > 86400 ; retry (1 > day) > 2419200 ; expire > (4 weeks) > 604800 ; minimum > (1 week) > ) > NS ns.DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD. > @ IN A 192.168.1.252 > @ IN MX 10 DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD. > @ IN TXT "v=spf1 mx a -all" > #================END========================> > my smb.conf looks like > #================START======================> [global] > netbios name = DOMAIN2 > realm = AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD > server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, > ldap, cldap, kdc, drepl, > winbindd, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate > workgroup = AD > server role = active directory domain controller > idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes > [netlogon] > path > /var/lib/samba/sysvol/ad.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD/scripts > read only = No > [sysvol] > path = /var/lib/samba/sysvol > read only = No > #================END========================> > > my krb5.conf looks like > #================START======================> [libdefaults] > default_realm = AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD > dns_lookup_realm = false > dns_lookup_kdc = true > #================END========================> -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL > and read the > instructions: > https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > > > > You are going about this the wrong way, you do not setup dhcp and > bind then add a Samba4 AD DC, you setup the AD DC with bind9 and > then add the dhcp server. > > > Your right now I will try adding dhcp to that same rule set > >I will give you a few hints: 'on commit' 'on release' and 'on expiry' :-) Rowland PS: if you get stuck, I could always tell you how I have been doing it for nearly 4 years.
Jeff Sadowski
2016-May-27 17:07 UTC
[Samba] ISC's dhcp server, radvd and bind9 now adding samba as an AD DC
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote:> On 27/05/16 17:11, Jeff Sadowski wrote: > >> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_BIND_as_backend_for_Samba_AD >> helped me find that I needed to add >> >> options { >> [...] >> tkey-gssapi-keytab "/usr/local/samba/private/dns.keytab"; >> [...] >> }; >> That seems to have fixed my errors with DNS >> >> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org <mailto: >> rpenny at samba.org>> wrote: >> >> On 27/05/16 14:37, Jeff Sadowski wrote: >> >> I had left my config alone for now and dhcp still writes to >> DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD. But samba has been complaining about >> not being able >> to write to bind in its zone. >> >> [2016/05/27 07:30:06.738434, 0] >> ../source4/dsdb/dns/dns_update.c:295(dnsupdate_nameupdate_done) >> ../source4/dsdb/dns/dns_update.c:295: Failed DNS update - >> NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL >> >> If you are right about it using kerberos I think I am missing >> a bit more >> configuration to allow bind to use kerberos. I have a place >> for it to use >> the key but nothing in it about kerberos and how to verify that. >> >> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:35 AM, mathias dufresne >> <infractory at gmail.com <mailto:infractory at gmail.com>> >> >> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Why modifying a working conf when you can build your DC on >> others systems >> (VM)? That could be really nice to learn but you add a lot >> of complexity in >> your process, I think. >> Why not using DLZ to access your AD zones? I expect Bind >> to be able to mix >> its behaviour: flat file for some zone, DLZ for others... >> >> Now regarding: >> update-policy { >> grant AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD ms-self * >> A AAAA; >> grant >> Administrator at AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD wildcard * A >> AAAA SRV CNAME; >> grant DOMAIN2$@ad.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD >> wildcard * A AAAA >> SRV CNAME; >> }; >> For me this means: >> grant AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD ms-self * A AAAA; >> Grant any authenticated user (from domain >> AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD) to >> modify A and AAAA it owns (ms-self) from any host (*). >> >> grant Administrator at AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD wildcard * A >> AAAA SRV CNAME; >> Grant administrator from domain AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD >> to do anything on >> any A AAAA SRV CNAME from any host >> >> same for last one. >> >> I'm really a new comer to DNS world, these thoughts come from >> >> http://docstore.mik.ua/orelly/networking_2ndEd/dns/ch10_02.htm >> >> These lines should make your Bind to use Kerberos. At >> least I do hope the >> authentication is Kerberos (that's AD!). If it is kerberos >> authentication, >> I expect you can rely on it as almost the whole world rely >> on Kerberos >> these days : ) >> >> A last thing regarding ISC's key method: >> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11520 >> I don't meant this bug as something to do with what you >> want to achieve, >> simply it could be a good thing to read if you understand >> anything to ISC's >> key method (that I don't), perhaps you could find some >> leads to follow or >> some information to avoid that configuration. >> >> Sorry not to help more. Have a nice day, >> >> mathias >> >> >> >> 2016-05-18 18:13 GMT+02:00 Jeff Sadowski >> <jeff.sadowski at gmail.com <mailto:jeff.sadowski at gmail.com>>: >> >> >> So I had dhcp, radvd and bind working together nicely >> and now I threw in a >> wrench of setting up an AD DC >> >> I want to change my dhcp server setting to put >> client's into the new AD >> Domain but am a little hesitant as it is all working >> so nicely with DDNS >> >> I'm starting to think all I need to do is edit just my >> dhcpd.conf and >> change occurrences of DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD to >> AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD >> A little touch up of db.self and comment out and >> eventually remove DOMAIN1 >> entries as everything is working as I like. >> >> My concern is moving from >> allow-update { key rndc-key; }; >> notify yes; >> to >> update-policy { >> grant AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD >> ms-self * A AAAA; >> grant >> Administrator at AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD wildcard * A >> AAAA SRV CNAME; >> grant >> DOMAIN2$@ad.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD wildcard * A AAAA >> SRV CNAME; >> }; >> >> The latter being produced when I created the domain in >> the example configs >> that I copied into mine. >> I think what that is saying is let the domain >> controller by name have >> access to the domain's entries >> I'm a little concerned about verification as I know >> the key method is safe >> and I'm not so sure about the grant method. >> >> Is there a way to have samba use ISC's key method? >> Anyone have any suggestions? >> >> My current setup is as below. >> >> My server name is the same as DOMAIN2 it has a ipv4 >> address of 192.168.1.1 >> and a ipv6 address of fc00:1::1111:1111:1111:1111 >> It's outside addresses are dhcp from my ISP I do ip >> masquerade on both >> ipv4 >> and ipv6 >> >> >> My dhcpd.conf looks as follows >> #================START======================>> ddns-updates on; >> ddns-update-style interim; >> ddns-domainname "DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD."; >> ddns-rev-domainname "in-addr.arpa."; >> ignore client-updates; >> option domain-search-order code 119 = string; >> include "/etc/rndc.key"; >> zone DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD { >> primary 192.168.1.1; >> key rndc-key; >> } >> zone 1.168.192.in-addr.arpa. { >> primary 192.168.1.1; >> key rndc-key; >> } >> default-lease-time 100000; >> max-lease-time 1000000; >> subnet 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { >> range 192.168.1.10 192.168.1.200; >> option routers 192.168.1.1; >> option domain-name "DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD."; >> option domain-name-servers 192.168.1.1; >> option domain-search-order >> "DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD.,ipv6.DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD."; >> next-server 192.168.1.1; >> filename "/pxelinux.0"; >> allow unknown-clients; >> } >> #================END========================>> >> My radvd.conf looks like so >> #================START======================>> interface eth0 >> { >> AdvSendAdvert on; >> prefix fc00:1::/64 >> { >> AdvOnLink on; >> AdvAutonomous on; >> }; >> RDNSS fc00:1::1111:1111:1111:1111 {}; >> }; >> #================END========================>> >> My named.conf after adding my samba looks like so >> #================START======================>> options { >> listen-on port 53 { 127.0.0.1; 192.168.1.1; }; >> listen-on-v6 port 53 { ::1; }; >> directory "/var/named"; >> dump-file "/var/named/data/cache_dump.db"; >> statistics-file >> "/var/named/data/named_stats.txt"; >> memstatistics-file >> "/var/named/data/named_mem_stats.txt"; >> allow-query { localhost; 192.168.1.0/16 >> <http://192.168.1.0/16>; }; >> recursion yes; >> dnssec-enable yes; >> dnssec-validation yes; >> dnssec-lookaside auto; >> bindkeys-file "/etc/named.iscdlv.key"; >> managed-keys-directory "/var/named/dynamic"; >> pid-file "/run/named/named.pid"; >> session-keyfile "/run/named/session.key"; >> }; >> logging { >> channel default_debug { >> file "data/named.run"; >> severity dynamic; >> }; >> }; >> zone "." IN { >> type hint; >> file "named.ca <http://named.ca>"; >> >> }; >> zone "ipv6.DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD" { >> type master; >> file "zones/db.ipv6.DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD"; >> allow-update { key rndc-key; }; >> notify yes; >> }; >> zone "DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD" IN { >> type master; >> file "zones/db.DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD"; >> allow-update { key rndc-key; }; >> notify yes; >> }; >> zone "ad.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD." IN { >> type master; >> file "zones/db.ad.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD"; >> update-policy { >> grant AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD >> ms-self * A AAAA; >> grant >> Administrator at AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD wildcard * A >> AAAA SRV CNAME; >> grant >> DOMAIN2$@ad.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD wildcard * A AAAA >> SRV CNAME; >> }; >> check-names ignore; >> }; >> zone "DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD" IN { type master; file >> "db.self"; }; >> #================END========================>> >> content of db.self >> #================START======================>> $TTL 604800 ; 1 week >> @ IN SOA ns.DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD MY.EMAIL. ( >> 2014092401 <tel:2014092401> ; serial >> >> 604800 ; refresh >> (1 week) >> 86400 ; retry (1 >> day) >> 2419200 ; expire >> (4 weeks) >> 604800 ; minimum >> (1 week) >> ) >> NS ns.DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD. >> @ IN A 192.168.1.252 >> @ IN MX 10 DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD. >> @ IN TXT "v=spf1 mx a -all" >> #================END========================>> >> my smb.conf looks like >> #================START======================>> [global] >> netbios name = DOMAIN2 >> realm = AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD >> server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, >> ldap, cldap, kdc, drepl, >> winbindd, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate >> workgroup = AD >> server role = active directory domain controller >> idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes >> [netlogon] >> path >> /var/lib/samba/sysvol/ad.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD/scripts >> read only = No >> [sysvol] >> path = /var/lib/samba/sysvol >> read only = No >> #================END========================>> >> >> my krb5.conf looks like >> #================START======================>> [libdefaults] >> default_realm = AD.DOMAIN2.SUBDOMAIN.TLD >> dns_lookup_realm = false >> dns_lookup_kdc = true >> #================END========================>> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL >> and read the >> instructions: >> https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba >> >> >> >> You are going about this the wrong way, you do not setup dhcp and >> bind then add a Samba4 AD DC, you setup the AD DC with bind9 and >> then add the dhcp server. >> >> >> Your right now I will try adding dhcp to that same rule set >> >> >> > I will give you a few hints: 'on commit' 'on release' and 'on expiry' :-)This page http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/ch9/dhcp.html makes it seem that I can replace the allow-update {key "ddns-a-rrs";}; # allowed key with update-policy {grant "ddns-a-ptr" self * A TXT DHCID;}; so I just added "grant rndc-key self * A TXT DHCID;" to my update policy> > Rowland > > PS: if you get stuck, I could always tell you how I have been doing it for > nearly 4 years. > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba >
Maybe Matching Threads
- ISC's dhcp server, radvd and bind9 now adding samba as an AD DC
- ISC's dhcp server, radvd and bind9 now adding samba as an AD DC
- ISC's dhcp server, radvd and bind9 now adding samba as an AD DC
- ISC's dhcp server, radvd and bind9 now adding samba as an AD DC
- ISC's dhcp server, radvd and bind9 now adding samba as an AD DC