search for: fc00

hello, the topology is like this: centos v0:eth1 <------> centos v0: eth2 fc00:2:3:4::1 fc00:2:3::4 i turned the packet forwarding ping6 -i eth2 fc00:2:3:4::1 the output is PING fc00:2:3:4::1(fc00:2:3:4::1) from fc00:2:3::5 eth2: 56 data bytes >From fc00:2:3::4 icmp_seq=1 Destination unreachable: Administratively prohibited >From fc00:2:3::4 icmp...

Hi! I installed CentOS 7 today, it's a minimal install, so it didn't have ifconfig command. So I installed net-tools, however I can't add ipv6 address to it. # ifconfig enp0s3 add fc00::1002/124 SIOCSIFADDR: Permission denied. Yes, I'm running as root. CentOS is running in a Qemu instance with e1000 ethernet card.

hello, i met a problem in configuratiion of ipv6 gw in my box i install centos 6.3 (64 bit) on my boxs, which have four netcard. i use a straight-through cable to connect centosv0:netcard-2 and centosv1:netcard2 the topology is this: client c(windows xp) <-->centosv0:netcard-3 <--> centosv0:netcard-2 <---> centosv1:netcard-2 <---->centosv1:netcard-2 <---> client d

Hi Everybody! I'm configuring an IPv6-Only network, the OS i'm using is Debian Lenny 506 and the problem is that i cant put Samba 3.2 working. After configuring the entire system, when i try to join to the domain(net ads join -U Administrator), returns "Segmentation Fault". And with "net ads join -U Administrator -S FQDN_AD_Server" returns "Failed to join domain:

.../> <domain name='network'/> <ip address='192.168.100.1' netmask='255.255.255.0'> <dhcp> <range start='192.168.100.128' end='192.168.100.254'/> </dhcp> </ip> <ip family='ipv6' address='fc00:dead:beef:55::' prefix='64'> </ip> </network> The first problem I hit was trying to start that network: error: internal error: Check the host setup: enabling IPv6 forwarding with RA routes without accept_ra set to 2 is likely to cause routes loss. Interfaces to lo...

...syntax error, unexpected string 3ffe::/16, ^^^^^^ ruleset.prod:53:30-35: Error: syntax error, unexpected string 5f00::/8, ^^^^^^ ruleset.prod:54:30-35: Error: syntax error, unexpected string fc00::/7, ^^^^^^ ruleset.prod:55:30-35: Error: syntax error, unexpected string fe80::/10 } ^^^^^^ --- ruleset.prod excerpt --- 43 set blackhole_ipv6 { 44 type ipv6_addr 45...

Although you can choose this in the installer, isnt the provided values supposed to be the default? I tired the following inst.repo=hd:/dev/sdb1:/repo Result: /dev/sdb1 is not mounted. inst.repo=nfs:[fc00::6009]:/home/auser/repo Result: NFS is not mounted even the correct ip is set by passing ip= parameters. Of course I tested the NFS share using CentOS itself. Thanks for any assistance!

...tion as I know the key method is safe and I'm not so sure about the grant method. Is there a way to have samba use ISC's key method? Anyone have any suggestions? My current setup is as below. My server name is the same as DOMAIN2 it has a ipv4 address of 192.168.1.1 and a ipv6 address of fc00:1::1111:1111:1111:1111 It's outside addresses are dhcp from my ISP I do ip masquerade on both ipv4 and ipv6 My dhcpd.conf looks as follows #================START======================= ddns-updates on; ddns-update-style interim; ddns-domainname "DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD."; ddns-rev-dom...

...'/> > <ip address='192.168.100.1' netmask='255.255.255.0'> > <dhcp> > <range start='192.168.100.128' end='192.168.100.254'/> > </dhcp> > </ip> > <ip family='ipv6' address='fc00:dead:beef:55::' prefix='64'> > </ip> > </network> > > The first problem I hit was trying to start that network: > > error: internal error: Check the host setup: enabling IPv6 forwarding > with RA routes without accept_ra set to 2 is likely...

...he grant method. >> >> Is there a way to have samba use ISC's key method? >> Anyone have any suggestions? >> >> My current setup is as below. >> >> My server name is the same as DOMAIN2 it has a ipv4 address of 192.168.1.1 >> and a ipv6 address of fc00:1::1111:1111:1111:1111 >> It's outside addresses are dhcp from my ISP I do ip masquerade on both >> ipv4 >> and ipv6 >> >> >> My dhcpd.conf looks as follows >> #================START======================= >> ddns-updates on; >> ddns-update-...

...se ISC's key method? >>>> Anyone have any suggestions? >>>> >>>> My current setup is as below. >>>> >>>> My server name is the same as DOMAIN2 it has a ipv4 address of >>>> 192.168.1.1 >>>> and a ipv6 address of fc00:1::1111:1111:1111:1111 >>>> It's outside addresses are dhcp from my ISP I do ip masquerade on both >>>> ipv4 >>>> and ipv6 >>>> >>>> >>>> My dhcpd.conf looks as follows >>>> #================START===============...

...e) ALPHA\renate opened file renate/My Documents/My Pictures/desktop.ini read=Yes write=No (numopen=3) [2015/12/19 22:47:00.537134, 3] ../source3/smbd/oplock_linux.c:155(linux_set_kernel_oplock) linux_set_kernel_oplock: got kernel oplock on file renate/My Documents/My Pictures/desktop.ini, file_id = fc00:29c1dfc:0 gen_id = 888224576 [2015/12/19 22:47:00.558468, 3] ../source3/smbd/smb2_read.c:413(smb2_read_complete) smbd_smb2_read: fnum 459648465, file renate/My Documents/My Pictures/desktop.ini, length=520 offset=0 read=520 [2015/12/19 22:47:00.566730, 2] ../source3/smbd/open.c:1005(open_file) ALPH...

...address='192.168.100.1' netmask='255.255.255.0'> > > <dhcp> > > <range start='192.168.100.128' end='192.168.100.254'/> > > </dhcp> > > </ip> > > <ip family='ipv6' address='fc00:dead:beef:55::' prefix='64'> > > </ip> > > </network> > > > > The first problem I hit was trying to start that network: > > > > error: internal error: Check the host setup: enabling IPv6 forwarding > > with RA routes wi...

...XXX is built into the kernel. CONFIG_BLK_DEV_VIA82CXXX=y my lspci -v gives 00:0f.0 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc. CX700M2 IDE (prog-if 8a [Master SecP PriP]) Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. Unknown device 0581 Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32 I/O ports at fc00 [size=16] Capabilities: [b0] Power Management version 2 Which I think is the VIA part. when I do "hdparm /dev/hdc" I get /dev/hdc: multcount = 0 (off) IO_support = 0 (default 16-bit) unmaskirq = 0 (off) using_dma = 0 (off) keepsettings = 0 (off) readonly = 0...

...>> Anyone have any suggestions? >> >> My current setup is as below. >> >> My server name is the same as DOMAIN2 it has a ipv4 >> address of 192.168.1.1 >> and a ipv6 address of fc00:1::1111:1111:1111:1111 >> It's outside addresses are dhcp from my ISP I do ip >> masquerade on both >> ipv4 >> and ipv6 >> >> >> My dhcpd.conf looks as follows >>...

...and I'm not so sure about the grant method. > > Is there a way to have samba use ISC's key method? > Anyone have any suggestions? > > My current setup is as below. > > My server name is the same as DOMAIN2 it has a ipv4 address of 192.168.1.1 > and a ipv6 address of fc00:1::1111:1111:1111:1111 > It's outside addresses are dhcp from my ISP I do ip masquerade on both ipv4 > and ipv6 > > > My dhcpd.conf looks as follows > #================START======================= > ddns-updates on; > ddns-update-style interim; > ddns-domainname &quot...

...t;>> Is there a way to have samba use ISC's key method? >>> Anyone have any suggestions? >>> >>> My current setup is as below. >>> >>> My server name is the same as DOMAIN2 it has a ipv4 address of 192.168.1.1 >>> and a ipv6 address of fc00:1::1111:1111:1111:1111 >>> It's outside addresses are dhcp from my ISP I do ip masquerade on both >>> ipv4 >>> and ipv6 >>> >>> >>> My dhcpd.conf looks as follows >>> #================START======================= >>> ddns-u...

...ba use ISC's key method? > Anyone have any suggestions? > > My current setup is as below. > > My server name is the same as DOMAIN2 it has a ipv4 > address of 192.168.1.1 > and a ipv6 address of fc00:1::1111:1111:1111:1111 > It's outside addresses are dhcp from my ISP I do ip > masquerade on both > ipv4 > and ipv6 > > > My dhcpd.conf looks as follows > #================STA...

On 02/04/2015 04:06 PM, dE wrote: > Although you can choose this in the installer, isnt the provided values > supposed to be the default? > > I tired the following > > inst.repo=hd:/dev/sdb1:/repo > > Result: /dev/sdb1 is not mounted. > > inst.repo=nfs:[fc00::6009]:/home/auser/repo > > Result: NFS is not mounted even the correct ip is set by passing ip= > parameters. > > Of course I tested the NFS share using CentOS itself. > > Thanks for any assistance! you dont need to include this repo in the installer, its already there by...

...e way is DNS? Are there any other name resolution systems? > Link local addresses should never be registered in DNS. However, they > can be used in LLMNR and mDNS. Why shouldn't they be registered in a .local domain? Are they not intended to be only on the LAN? I manually assigned an fc00::/7 address to a Windows workstation and it still does not appear to be registered to the dDNS. Are these also considered banned from DNS?