> no, it only has a theoretical impact on the number of open > filehandles, theroretical means in that context surely not relevant > for a fileserver > > if you have a preforking service and expect many thousand forkers than > it may become relevantThank you Would you give the same advice in the case of a Samba 4 AD Domain Controller?
Am 12.03.2016 um 20:16 schrieb Miguel Medalha:> >> no, it only has a theoretical impact on the number of open >> filehandles, theroretical means in that context surely not relevant >> for a fileserver >> >> if you have a preforking service and expect many thousand forkers than >> it may become relevant > > Would you give the same advice in the case of a Samba 4 AD Domain > Controller?i would give the same device for *any* type of software since the whole operating system including the kernel itself these days is built with shared modules and you hardly gain anything measureable just because one piece of your system is statically compiled when it's mostly interesting on very slow embedded devices where it makes a small difference in startup time when a lower amount of files needs to be loaded -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20160312/1e70ea24/signature.sig>
> i would give the same device for *any* type of software since the > whole operating system including the kernel itself these days is built > with shared modules and you hardly gain anything measureable just > because one piece of your system is statically compiled > > when it's mostly interesting on very slow embedded devices where it > makes a small difference in startup time when a lower amount of files > needs to be loadedNevertheless, the default build of smbd produces almost twenty builtin modules, such as vfs_posixacl... Why would that be?