samba - Feb 2015 - [Solved] Re: samba4: cleaning up deleted DNS objects

You have an point with email an spam here. I do not respond off list to 
unknown peolple in general. Now that thread contains an usefull answer. 
I reply only to the list again, now without your name and e-mail addy.

achim~

> Hi,
>
> I didn't notice it earlier, but now I was going through samba mailing
list
> archives I noticed you sent your reply to the samba mailing list (so
> basically, the rest of the world as these end up in archives). Your reply
> included my entire e-mail (quoted).
>
> I would really have appreciated it if you would have asked beforehand if
> this was ok.
>
> If I knew it would be sent to a public mailing list then I would have used
a
> different email account to avoid spam and would likely have omitted or
> changed some parts of my text since it doesn't concern the rest of the
world.
>
> I suggest you take that into account in the future.. not (just) for me, of
> course..
>
> Thanks,
>
> XXXX
>

On 24/02/15 20:33, Achim Gottinger wrote:
> You have an point with email an spam here. I do not respond off list 
> to unknown peolple in general. Now that thread contains an usefull 
> answer. I reply only to the list again, now without your name and 
> e-mail addy.
>
> achim~
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I didn't notice it earlier, but now I was going through samba
mailing
>> list
>> archives I noticed you sent your reply to the samba mailing list (so
>> basically, the rest of the world as these end up in archives). Your 
>> reply
>> included my entire e-mail (quoted).
>>
>> I would really have appreciated it if you would have asked beforehand
if
>> this was ok.
>>
>> If I knew it would be sent to a public mailing list then I would have 
>> used a
>> different email account to avoid spam and would likely have omitted or
>> changed some parts of my text since it doesn't concern the rest of 
>> the world.
>>
>> I suggest you take that into account in the future.. not (just) for 
>> me, of
>> course..
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> XXXX
>>
>
Hi, I think the OP should have expected something like this to happen 
when he emails somebody whose email address he got of an open mailing 
list. It was his responsibility to use an email address that was 
basically a throw away one and he should have couched it in terms that 
didn't matter if it ended up in the public forum.

If anybody emails me direct about a samba matter, it will very probably 
end up here, because I will reply only to the list, especially if it is 
in the middle of a thread.

I will decide if I want to reply direct to anybody that emails me, I 
suspect that is what Achim decided.

Rowland

not only that, but on most lists it's considered rude to go off-list
unless the message is of a private nature, in which discretion should
certainly be used when bringing it back on list.  ones email address
itself is not considered private after subscribing to a public list.

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Rowland Penny
<rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 24/02/15 20:33, Achim Gottinger wrote:
>>
>> You have an point with email an spam here. I do not respond off list to
>> unknown peolple in general. Now that thread contains an usefull answer.
I
>> reply only to the list again, now without your name and e-mail addy.
>>
>> achim~
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I didn't notice it earlier, but now I was going through samba
mailing
>>> list
>>> archives I noticed you sent your reply to the samba mailing list
(so
>>> basically, the rest of the world as these end up in archives). Your
reply
>>> included my entire e-mail (quoted).
>>>
>>> I would really have appreciated it if you would have asked
beforehand if
>>> this was ok.
>>>
>>> If I knew it would be sent to a public mailing list then I would
have
>>> used a
>>> different email account to avoid spam and would likely have omitted
or
>>> changed some parts of my text since it doesn't concern the rest
of the
>>> world.
>>>
>>> I suggest you take that into account in the future.. not (just) for
me,
>>> of
>>> course..
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> XXXX
>>>
>>
>
> Hi, I think the OP should have expected something like this to happen when
> he emails somebody whose email address he got of an open mailing list. It
> was his responsibility to use an email address that was basically a throw
> away one and he should have couched it in terms that didn't matter if
it
> ended up in the public forum.
>
> If anybody emails me direct about a samba matter, it will very probably end
> up here, because I will reply only to the list, especially if it is in the
> middle of a thread.
>
> I will decide if I want to reply direct to anybody that emails me, I
suspect
> that is what Achim decided.
>
> Rowland
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 21:15 +0000, Rowland Penny wrote:
> If anybody emails me direct about a samba matter, it will very probably 
> end up here, because I will reply only to the list, especially if it is 
> in the middle of a thread.
> 
> I will decide if I want to reply direct to anybody that emails me, I 
> suspect that is what Achim decided.
Rowland,

I would suggest not doing that unilaterally.  

I do get many mails that go to me personally, and not also to the list.
To these, I kindly ask that they re-ask the question on the list, so
others can benefit from the reply. 

This ensures I don't accidental breach privacy.  Most posters realise
their error and politely apologise. 

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                       http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team  http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Catalyst IT          http://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba