search for: deleted

...zeromq/ However, if I run command: $ rsync -avn --delete remotehost:/mnt/volsw_dev/AS5/zeromq/ /mnt/volsw_dev/AS5/zeromq There are no changes reported (which is what I expected). Why does doing the rsync one level up (without zeromq) cause rsync to indicate the local zeromq directory should be deleted, but adding the zeromq directory to the source and destination path make rsync work as I expect? I'm sure I'm missing something basic in the way --delete works, but if someone can explain, I'd appreciate it. This is rsync 3.0.6 (on both the local and remote server). Thanks, Richard

...nup: deleting unreferenced inode 2009823 ext3_orphan_cleanup: deleting unreferenced inode 2009856 ext3_orphan_cleanup: deleting unreferenced inode 2009807 ext3_orphan_cleanup: deleting unreferenced inode 2009799 ext3_orphan_cleanup: deleting unreferenced inode 2009794 EXT3-fs: md1: 27 orphan inodes deleted EXT3-fs: recovery complete. It's my array: $ df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/md1 9.5G 735M 8.3G 8% / /dev/md7 38G 6.7G 30G 19% /var /dev/md6 15G 4.5G 9.1G 33% /usr /dev/md5 103G 45G 54G 46%...

...rsync --dry-run -a --delete --max-delete=1000 /foo /bar && rsync -a --delete --max-delete=1000 /foo /bar I found bug 2408 (https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2408) that described my concerns: > If you specify the --max-delete option to rsync and there are more files to be > deleted than the specified number, all the deletes upto that number are normally > performed and other files that would otherwise be deleted are now silently > ignored. Also, if more files are scheduled for removal, no error code is returned. > > The --max-delete option is especially usefull i...

...ontact: rsync-qa at samba.org When using: 'rsync -uav --delete --dry-run', the 'deleting ...' list displayed is output in *descending* sort order while the normal --verbose list of files is output in *ascending* sort order. This makes attempting to read and compare the files being deleted and updated very awkward. To fix this issue, the --delete list should be presented in the same order as the --verbose list (especially when --dry-run is given). Example, currently rsync behaves like this: rsync --delete -uavn ../dir1 desthost:~/dir2 dir1/ deleting dir2/file-z ... deletin...

...-I/usr/include/dovecot/src/lib \ -I/usr/include/dovecot/src/lib-storage \ -I/usr/include/dovecot/src/lib-mail \ -I/usr/include/dovecot/src/lib-imap \ -I/usr/include/dovecot/src/lib-index \ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H \ deleted-to-trash-plugin.c -o lib_deleted_to_trash_plugin.so In file included from deleted-to-trash-plugin.c:2:0: deleted-to-trash-plugin.h:19:2: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'ARRAY_DEFINE' ARRAY_DEFINE(mail_id, unsigned int); ^ deleted-to-trash-plugin.c: In function 'get_...

...graphics off; run; quit; proc univariate data=resids normal plot; id Barcode Grain_Yield__Mg_h_ pearsonresid; var resid; proc print data=resids (obs=3);run; Can someone please help me convert my code to R? Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks, Andrew Harmon [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, the combination of --keep-dirlinks and --delete (--delete-during, --delete-delay) erroneously deletes symlinks to directories on the receiver. With --delete-before and --delete-after it works as expected. (rsync version 3.0.3 protocol version, on Debian Lenny) I don't think that this behaviour is intended. Details/example: - Host 1 directory-structure: drwx------ ./1

...y important feature for me from courier is that expunged messages end up in Trash where they are removed after 7 days. I can get an approximation of this feature as described in the documentation: namespace private { prefix = INBOX. seperator = . inbox = yes } namespace private { prefix = DELETED. seperator = . location = maildur:~/Maildir/deleted } lazy_expunge = DELETED. DELETED. DELETED. This all works fine except for messages that were deleted from the Inbox. They do end up in the right place (~/Maildir/deleted/cur) but that location is not listed as a subscribable folder. Her...

libswfdec/swfdec_as_context.c | 24 +++ libswfdec/swfdec_as_context.h | 2 libswfdec/swfdec_as_frame.c | 56 +++++-- libswfdec/swfdec_as_frame.h | 4 libswfdec/swfdec_as_interpret.c | 18 +- libswfdec/swfdec_as_object.c | 85 +++------- libswfdec/swfdec_as_object.h | 16 +-

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645 Summary: --one-file-system semantics changed with 2.6.4 (bug?) Product: rsync Version: 2.6.4 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:

Hello, I use rsync v3.0.7 with "--delete-during", but it appears to act more like "--delete-before". I've checked the docs and list archives, but I am still discovering some of the subtleties of rsync, and I can't see where I'm going wrong. There's an example of my issue below... can anybody set me straight? =-) o We archive a small number of large files,

I'm generating a list of files to sync, and would like all the files not in my list to be deleted from the destination. I thought that --delete-missing-args would do just that, but it doesn't delete anything. Would someone have an idea of what I'm doing wrong? This is what I tried : ~$ mkdir -p /tmp/source /tmp/dest ~$ for i in {1..3}; do echo "keep $i"      > /tmp/sou...

...o created during compiling (well, literally, during tar extraction done by the script that does the compiling). When rsync is run to re-syncronize, which should delete all created files (including all those extracted from the tar file), the directory that is the target of the symlink apparently is deleted first. Then when the symlink is encountered, I get an error saying that readlink gets No such file or directory. This doesn't make sense since readlink should work on a dangling link. Here's a paste of manually doing the rsync within the same host (warning, the first line is 318 characte...

Is anyone successfully using the Cygwin rsync on Win2k (or NT4) as both daemon and client, with --delete-after working on the client? I can get --delete to work, but I'd prefer to delete files only on a successful transfer, to ensure that the end-user has a working collection of files, no matter what release. For some reason, --delete-after does nothing for me, even as administrator on the

...egies that won't benefit from this code being here. If anything, this code is actively confusing those efforts and so I would like to garbage collect and help pave the way for new stuff. We can always recover this code from the VCS if needed in the future. Files on the chopping block: # deleted: include/llvm/Analysis/PathNumbering.h # deleted: include/llvm/Analysis/PathProfileInfo.h # deleted: include/llvm/Analysis/ProfileDataLoader.h # deleted: include/llvm/Analysis/ProfileDataTypes.h # deleted: include/llvm/Analysis/ProfileInfo.h # deleted:...

...works in the application). I was looking for some debug advice on how to find my problem. Here is the test: def test_should_delete_word assert_equal ''published'', words(:one).status debugger delete :destroy, :id => words(:one).to_param assert_equal ''deleted'', words(:one).status end It fails on the last with: <"deleted"> expected but was <"published">. //My fixture: one: word: cup was_created_by_user: true status: published user_id: 1 ip_address: ''129.1.0.0'' //Controller: def des...

hi there im using samba 3.0.1 and have problems with usrmgr.exe and rpc calls to add/delete users stored in LDAP (2.1.22) an rpc call to add/delete a user gives "Access Denied" some extracts from the log --------------------------------------------------------------------------- smbldap_search_suffix: searching

...can't see how to achieve this using the constraint mechanism provided. Additional details are provided in the code below. Suggestions? Best Regards, Steven Generate the data set I'm using: mu<-c(1,5) sigma<-c(1,2,2,6) dim(sigma)<-c(2,2) set.seed(83165026) sample.full<-sample.deleted<-mvrnorm(50,mu,sigma) delete.one<-c(1,5,13,20) delete.two<-c(3,11,17,31,40,41) sample.deleted[delete.one,1]<-NA sample.deleted[delete.two,2]<-NA missing<-c(delete.one,delete.two) complete<-sample.deleted[!(is.na(sample.deleted[,1]) | is.na(sample.deleted[,2])),] deleted<-sam...

...e) newData <- data[-delete] But as I try the way with a minus I'll get the message: "invalid argument to unary operator" There must be a simple way to delete all of the columns, but I just don't get it. Thanks for your help, -- Anne Skoeries [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hello, I need to create a local backup every night of a filesystem that has about 3.5 million files. I've been using rsync and everything has been fine until I started to use the -delete option to delete files on the backup that don't exist in the production data. When I added the -delete option, my backup started taking about two days to finish. So I changed my backup script to