John Lewis
2015-Jan-13 15:11 UTC
[Samba] Is there any problem that can arise from remapping gidNumber?
On 01/13/2015 09:23 AM, Rowland Penny wrote:> On 13/01/15 14:06, John Lewis wrote: >> On 01/13/2015 06:35 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> On 13/01/15 11:33, John Lewis wrote: >>>> This morning I remapped gidNumber from primaryGroupID to gidNumber. I >>>> did that because I could not change the integer in primaryGroupID wit >>>> ldbedt as root. >>>> >>>> I mapped to to a new attribute called gidNumber which has no specific >>>> meaning in samba. Is there any potential problems that can arise from >>>> doing that. Is there a better way to fix that problem? >>>> >>> Hmm, definitely going to need more info here, gidNumber has a specific >>> meaning to samba, depending on how you set up samba. >>> Rowland >>> >> I took the defaults except for rfc2307 which I enabled. I am running >> Samba Version 4.1.11-Debian. > > Yes, but what as ?? an AD DC or in classic mode i.e. just like samba3 > Might be best if you post your smb.conf (sanitised ) > > RowlandI attached it to this email. -------------- next part -------------- # Global parameters [global] workgroup = OFLAMEO realm = D.OFLAMEO.COM netbios name = DRAKEBURNER server role = active directory domain controller dns forwarder = 192.168.2.1 idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes [netlogon] path = /var/lib/samba/sysvol/d.oflameo.com/scripts read only = No [sysvol] path = /var/lib/samba/sysvol read only = No
Rowland Penny
2015-Jan-13 15:41 UTC
[Samba] Is there any problem that can arise from remapping gidNumber?
On 13/01/15 15:11, John Lewis wrote:> On 01/13/2015 09:23 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 13/01/15 14:06, John Lewis wrote: >>> On 01/13/2015 06:35 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>> On 13/01/15 11:33, John Lewis wrote: >>>>> This morning I remapped gidNumber from primaryGroupID to gidNumber. I >>>>> did that because I could not change the integer in primaryGroupID wit >>>>> ldbedt as root. >>>>> >>>>> I mapped to to a new attribute called gidNumber which has no specific >>>>> meaning in samba. Is there any potential problems that can arise from >>>>> doing that. Is there a better way to fix that problem? >>>>> >>>> Hmm, definitely going to need more info here, gidNumber has a specific >>>> meaning to samba, depending on how you set up samba. >>>> Rowland >>>> >>> I took the defaults except for rfc2307 which I enabled. I am running >>> Samba Version 4.1.11-Debian. >> Yes, but what as ?? an AD DC or in classic mode i.e. just like samba3 >> Might be best if you post your smb.conf (sanitised ) >> >> Rowland > I attached it to this email. > >OK, so you are running samba4 as an AD DC, gidNumber definitely means something and if you want to change a users primarygroup, you need to do something like this: First give the group that you want to be the new primarygroup a gidNumber (told you it means something) next, make sure the user is a member of this group, if not, add user to group get the groups RID change the users primaryGroupID attribute to the groups RID AD will do the rest Rowland
John Lewis
2015-Jan-13 16:10 UTC
[Samba] Is there any problem that can arise from remapping gidNumber?
On 01/13/2015 10:41 AM, Rowland Penny wrote:> On 13/01/15 15:11, John Lewis wrote: >> On 01/13/2015 09:23 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> On 13/01/15 14:06, John Lewis wrote: >>>> On 01/13/2015 06:35 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>>> On 13/01/15 11:33, John Lewis wrote: >>>>>> This morning I remapped gidNumber from primaryGroupID to gidNumber. I >>>>>> did that because I could not change the integer in primaryGroupID wit >>>>>> ldbedt as root. >>>>>> >>>>>> I mapped to to a new attribute called gidNumber which has no specific >>>>>> meaning in samba. Is there any potential problems that can arise from >>>>>> doing that. Is there a better way to fix that problem? >>>>>> >>>>> Hmm, definitely going to need more info here, gidNumber has a specific >>>>> meaning to samba, depending on how you set up samba. >>>>> Rowland >>>>> >>>> I took the defaults except for rfc2307 which I enabled. I am running >>>> Samba Version 4.1.11-Debian. >>> Yes, but what as ?? an AD DC or in classic mode i.e. just like samba3 >>> Might be best if you post your smb.conf (sanitised ) >>> >>> Rowland >> I attached it to this email. >> >> > > OK, so you are running samba4 as an AD DC, gidNumber definitely means > something and if you want to change a users primarygroup, you need to do > something like this: > > First give the group that you want to be the new primarygroup a > gidNumber (told you it means something) > next, make sure the user is a member of this group, if not, add user to > group > get the groups RID > change the users primaryGroupID attribute to the groups RID > AD will do the rest > > Rowland >What attribute is the group's RID?
Seemingly Similar Threads
- Is there any problem that can arise from remapping gidNumber?
- Is there any problem that can arise from remapping gidNumber?
- Is there any problem that can arise from remapping gidNumber?
- Is there any problem that can arise from remapping gidNumber?
- Is there any problem that can arise from remapping gidNumber?