If you don't want to spend money on RHEL, you can always look at CentOS
(which is a clone of RHEL) or Fedora.
I don't now if you can do an upgrade installation from RHEL to CentOS
or Fedora. I think not. But since either OS will support the ext3
file system used by RHEL, you should be able to backup your
configuration files, install RHEL or Fedora while preserving your data
partitions.
Nt. I found out the hard way that Fedora does NOT necessarily support
the same firmware raid drivers as RHEL. Make sure you have backup of
your data just in case.
On 06/26/12 13:01, jlee at brewtoncityschools.org wrote:> Thanks I'll check and see what a newer version of RHEL is going to cost
me. I
> was thinking that was the problem. I'll also look into Sernet.
>
> Thanks again
>
>
>> Typically, RPM's from RedHat or Fedora are pretty dependent on
glibc and
>> other system libraries. Newer version of RedHat will have newer
>> versions of glibc, so the official packages are often not compatible
>> with older versions.
>>
>> Sernet may have precompiled RPM's that may be useful.
>>
>> http://sernet.de/en/samba/samba-3/
>>
>>
>> If not you will probably need to compile from source. Or move to a
>> newer version of RHEL.
>>
>>
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: [Samba] Trying to update samba
>> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:45:55 -0500 (CDT)
>> From: jlee at brewtoncityschools.org
>> To: samba at lists.samba.org
>>
>>
>>
>> I have a server running samba-3.0.9-1.3E.10. And I'm trying to
update that so I
>> can now add windows 7 pcs to my network. The server is a Dell
Poweredge 2850
>> running Red Hat Enterprise Linux EX release 3 (taroon update 8).
It's also
>> running Webmin version 1.580. I wanted to download the update as an
.rmp
>> thinking it would be easier and I would be able to run it from my
webmin command
>> line. I went to
http://rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/search.php?query=samba to the
>> .rmp. I wasn't sure which one to try so I tried a few. I would
like to stay
>> away fedora if possible. I ran the rmp from my command shell using rpm
-U
>> command. That ended up giving me the error
>>
>> error: Failed dependencies:
>> libacl.so.1(ACL_1.0) is needed by samba-3.6.3-34.12.1
>> libattr.so.1(ATTR_1.0) is needed by samba-3.6.3-34.12.1
>> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.11) is needed by samba-3.6.3-34.12.1
>> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) is needed by samba-3.6.3-34.12.1
>> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) is needed by samba-3.6.3-34.12.1
>> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.5) is needed by samba-3.6.3-34.12.1
>> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.6) is needed by samba-3.6.3-34.12.1
>> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.8) is needed by samba-3.6.3-34.12.1
>> libgssapi_krb5.so.2(gssapi_krb5_2_MIT) is needed by
samba-3.6.3-34.12.1
>> libk5crypto.so.3(k5crypto_3_MIT) is needed by samba-3.6.3-34.12.1
>> libkrb5.so.3(krb5_3_MIT) is needed by samba-3.6.3-34.12.1
>> liblber-2.4.so.2 is needed by samba-3.6.3-34.12.1
>> libldap-2.4.so.2 is needed by samba-3.6.3-34.12.1
>> libnscd.so.1 is needed by samba-3.6.3-34.12.1
>> libnscd.so.1(LIBNSCD_1.0) is needed by samba-3.6.3-34.12.1
>> libpam.so.0(LIBPAM_1.0) is needed by samba-3.6.3-34.12.1
>> libpam.so.0(LIBPAM_EXTENSION_1.0) is needed by samba-3.6.3-34.12.1
>> libpopt.so.0(LIBPOPT_0) is needed by samba-3.6.3-34.12.1
>> libtalloc.so.2 is needed by samba-3.6.3-34.12.1
>> libtdb.so.1 is needed by samba-3.6.3-34.12.1
>> libwbclient.so.0 is needed by samba-3.6.3-34.12.1
>> samba-client >= 3.6.3 is needed by samba-3.6.3-34.12.1
>> rpmlib(PayloadIsLzma) <= 4.4.6-1 is needed by samba-3.6.3-34.12.1
>>
>>
>>
>> Then I tried rpm -U --nodeps. The new error message I received was
>>
>> error: unpacking of archive failed: cpio: Bad magic
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm not really familiar with this os so any help would greatly be
appreciated.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>>
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>> believed to be clean.
>>
>>