David Young
2008-Sep-21 22:11 UTC
[Samba] What's "NT Trans Response : STATUS_CANCELLED", and why does it take so long?
Hi folks, I have a samba 3.0.25b server running on Centos 4.6. My users complain of intermittent responsiveness issues, but I haven't been able to identify the problem. I've done some traffic dumps with tethereal, and have run them through Wireshark's "Service Response Time" report. I've identified several packets identified like this: "SMB NT Trans Response, FID: 0x2c1e, NT NOTIFY, Error: STATUS_CANCELLED" What I'm unsure about is this line in the SMB Header: "Time from request: 458.719370000 seconds" Can anybody explain to me what this "NT Notify" packet is saying, and whether a large time-from-request is to be expected? Thanks! - David
Jeremy Allison
2008-Sep-21 22:59 UTC
[Samba] What's "NT Trans Response : STATUS_CANCELLED", and why does it take so long?
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 09:37:13AM +1200, David Young wrote:> Hi folks, > > I have a samba 3.0.25b server running on Centos 4.6. My users complain > of intermittent responsiveness issues, but I haven't been able to > identify the problem. I've done some traffic dumps with tethereal, and > have run them through Wireshark's "Service Response Time" report. I've > identified several packets identified like this: > > "SMB NT Trans Response, FID: 0x2c1e, NT NOTIFY, Error: STATUS_CANCELLED" > > What I'm unsure about is this line in the SMB Header: > > "Time from request: 458.719370000 seconds" > > Can anybody explain to me what this "NT Notify" packet is saying, and > whether a large time-from-request is to be expected?An NT Notify packet is a requests notification when a directory is changed. Hence it can be a long time from when the packet is sent to when the notify replies (if it ever does). The unresponsiveness is not to do with this packet. Try upgrading to 3.2.4 - there have been so many changes since 3.0.25b it isn't funny :-). Jeremy.