samba - Feb 2006 - RPM Version

Could anyone please tell me if the current Fedora RPM (which appears 
under .../core/4/... ) would run under Fedora Core 2 ??
Thanks
Robert

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Bob von Knobloch wrote:
> Could anyone please tell me if the current Fedora RPM
> (which appears under .../core/4/... ) would run under
> Fedora Core 2 ??
I would suggest recompile the SRPM.





cheers, jerry
====================================================================I live in a
Reply-to-All world                -----------------------
Samba                                    ------- http://www.samba.org
Centeris                         -----------  http://www.centeris.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFD4MqYIR7qMdg1EfYRAvCKAJ9xPu3Kjr/bJllDRkn9xxUy1ehdbgCeP1lQ
PXZcCde1z/IESCQ4SdIOGKQ=ji7y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Bob von Knobloch wrote:
> Could anyone please tell me if the current Fedora RPM (which appears
> under .../core/4/... ) would run under Fedora Core 2 ??
> Thanks
> Robert
Robert,

I would say in most cases maybe.  But like Jerry suggests I'd compile
the SRPM and fix any dependency issues by hand as they surface.

You could also take the SRPM for your distribution, like I did for FC1,
and modify to work with the sources from samba.org ...  Most of the
patches work with little modification from the original if my memory is
correct.  The latest 2.0.21b version removes the Fedora directory under
packaging; but, I fixed by re-creating the directory and stuffing the
files to be copied in there.

Your mileage will vary.

James Kosin

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFD4O4NjNkgON6wBZARApphAKCBcaLLZtudHDTf2ohr7y0vsV1NAACcCaQ5
kNMYx1usfzRp4mvMDAacd+g=b6n0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----