Hi folks,
We have been experiencing problems with one of our Samba servers here
for a while now and need a little help.  First off we are running Fedora
Core 3, kernel version 2.6.12-1, and Samba version 3.0.20b. Our hardware
is a RAID 5 DELL PowerEdge 700 server. The problem  I am about to
describe has occurred on this server in previous versions of samba prior
to version 3.0.20b and has the same result every time it happens.
To get to the point of the problem, this server will run fine for a
period of time and then begin to build up SMBD processes until
eventually our users can no longer access shares.  The Samba server just
stops responding.  It does not even respond to STOP, START, or RESTART
commands.  Doing a RESTART on samba will look like it is restarting the
service, but Samba will still be in the same locked state with shares
still not available.  Doing a status on the service then reveals that
the STOP, START, or RESTART did nothing to clear out the old processes
or the locked files it thought it previously had opened.  We end up just
rebooting the server to clear everything out.  Right now we are just
reading through all the documentation, posts, and waiting for this to
happen again to hopefully capture some error in the log.  When that
happens I'll send more detail.
I've seen other posts about this, but none ever clearly state some sort
of resolution to this problem.  So I know this is happening to others.
It's getting increasingly more frustrating since we have been running
samba as our file servers for Windows clients for years now and never
had this much of a problem with it crashing on us like this.  Our
smb.conf file is pretty basic and really it is the one we have run since
we first started.  Since we have not had a problem in the past this is
making me think it is more an external application, like one of our
databases possibly that is causing the SMBD process to build out of
control.  We are open to any and all suggestions to help fix this from
happening anymore.
smb.conf file:
[global]
        workgroup = XXX
        server string = Samba Server
        security = DOMAIN
        log file = /var/log/samba/log
        max log size = 100000
        socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
        dns proxy = No
        ldap ssl = no
        log level = 5
        load printers = No
        kernel oplocks = No
[homes]
        comment = Home Directories
        read only = No
        browseable = No
        available = No
#[printers]
#       comment = All Printers
#       path = /var/spool/samba
#       printable = Yes
#       browseable = No
[public_app]
        comment = Public Data Repository
        path = /var/local/group_shares/public_data
        read only = No
        create mask = 02775
        force create mode = 02775
        directory mask = 02775
        force directory mode = 02775
[prod_control]
        comment = Production Control Repository
        path = /var/local/group_shares/prod_control
        read only = No
        create mask = 02775
        force create mode = 02775
        directory mask = 02775
        force directory mode = 02775
-- 
Matt Lung
Midwest Tool & Die, Corp.
On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 09:50 -0500, Matt Lung wrote:> To get to the point of the problem, this server will run fine for a > period of time and then begin to build up SMBD processes until > eventually our users can no longer access shares. The Samba server just > stops responding. It does not even respond to STOP, START, or RESTART > commands. Doing a RESTART on samba will look like it is restarting the > service, but Samba will still be in the same locked state with shares > still not available. Doing a status on the service then reveals that > the STOP, START, or RESTART did nothing to clear out the old processes > or the locked files it thought it previously had opened. We end up just > rebooting the server to clear everything out. Right now we are just > reading through all the documentation, posts, and waiting for this to > happen again to hopefully capture some error in the log. When that > happens I'll send more detail.Instead of immediately restarting it you may attach a strace to the spinning process and tell us where it dies. Meanwhile I suggest you to check the integrity of your tdb files (killing with -9 may lead to corrupted tdbs and in some rare occasion I've seen our code spinning on corrupted files). To check if a tdb is ok, you can tdbbackup it (no need to stop samba for that) and see if the backup is ok. In case of error you have a corrupted tdb and it is better to remove and restart it in case it is a temporary db or plan adequate measures in case it is a persistent one. Simo. -- Simo Sorce - idra@samba.org Samba Team - http://www.samba.org Italian Site - http://samba.xsec.it
Hi folks,
We have been experiencing problems with one of our Samba servers here 
for a while now and need a little help.  First off we are running Fedora 
Core 3, kernel version 2.6.12-1, and Samba version 3.0.20b. Our hardware 
is a RAID 5 DELL PowerEdge 700 server. The problem  I am about to 
describe has occurred on this server in previous versions of samba prior 
to version 3.0.20b and has the same result every time it happens. 
To get to the point of the problem, this server will run fine for a 
period of time and then begin to build up SMBD processes until 
eventually our users can no longer access shares.  The Samba server just 
stops responding.  It does not even respond to STOP, START, or RESTART 
commands.  Doing a RESTART on samba will look like it is restarting the 
service, but Samba will still be in the same locked state with shares 
still not available.  Doing a status on the service then reveals that 
the STOP, START, or RESTART did nothing to clear out the old processes 
or the locked files it thought it previously had opened.  We end up just 
rebooting the server to clear everything out.  Right now we are just 
reading through all the documentation, posts, and waiting for this to 
happen again to hopefully capture some error in the log.  When that 
happens I'll send more detail. 
I've seen other posts about this, but none ever clearly state some sort 
of resolution to this problem.  So I know this is happening to others.  
It's getting increasingly more frustrating since we have been running 
samba as our file servers for Windows clients for years now and never 
had this much of a problem with it crashing on us like this.  Our 
smb.conf file is pretty basic and really it is the one we have run since 
we first started.  Since we have not had a problem in the past this is 
making me think it is more an external application, like one of our 
databases possibly that is causing the SMBD process to build out of 
control.  We are open to any and all suggestions to help fix this from 
happening anymore. 
smb.conf file:
[global]
        workgroup = XXX
        server string = Samba Server
        security = DOMAIN
        log file = /var/log/samba/log
        max log size = 100000
        socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
        dns proxy = No
        ldap ssl = no
        log level = 5
        load printers = No
        kernel oplocks = No
[homes]
        comment = Home Directories
        read only = No
        browseable = No
        available = No
#[printers]
#       comment = All Printers
#       path = /var/spool/samba
#       printable = Yes
#       browseable = No
[public_app]
        comment = Public Data Repository
        path = /var/local/group_shares/public_data
        read only = No
        create mask = 02775
        force create mode = 02775
        directory mask = 02775
        force directory mode = 02775
[prod_control]
        comment = Production Control Repository
        path = /var/local/group_shares/prod_control
        read only = No
        create mask = 02775
        force create mode = 02775
        directory mask = 02775
        force directory mode = 02775
-- 
Matt Lung
Midwest Tool & Die, Corp.
Brian_Pickering@selinc.com
2005-Dec-08  18:19 UTC
[Samba] Hanging SMBD processes - Samba CRASHING
We've had similar troubles with Samba 3.x on our ClearCase VOB server running RHEL3. Our fix was to go back to the old 2.2.12, and we haven't had a problem since. Unfortunately I was never able to devote enough time to tracking down the problem fully. I had hoped that upgrading to RHEL4 using a 2.6 kernel would help, but your experience doesn't bode well for that. -------------------------------------------- Brian Pickering System Administrator - Information Services Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc. Email - Brian_Pickering@selinc.com Telephone - 509-332-1890 x1212 samba-bounces+brian_pickering=selinc.com@lists.samba.org wrote on 12/07/2005 06:50:28 AM:> Hi folks, > > We have been experiencing problems with one of our Samba servers here > for a while now and need a little help. First off we are running Fedora > Core 3, kernel version 2.6.12-1, and Samba version 3.0.20b. Our hardware > is a RAID 5 DELL PowerEdge 700 server. The problem I am about to > describe has occurred on this server in previous versions of samba prior > to version 3.0.20b and has the same result every time it happens. > > To get to the point of the problem, this server will run fine for a > period of time and then begin to build up SMBD processes until > eventually our users can no longer access shares. The Samba server just > stops responding. It does not even respond to STOP, START, or RESTART > commands. Doing a RESTART on samba will look like it is restarting the > service, but Samba will still be in the same locked state with shares > still not available. Doing a status on the service then reveals that > the STOP, START, or RESTART did nothing to clear out the old processes > or the locked files it thought it previously had opened. We end up just > rebooting the server to clear everything out. Right now we are just > reading through all the documentation, posts, and waiting for this to > happen again to hopefully capture some error in the log. When that > happens I'll send more detail. > > I've seen other posts about this, but none ever clearly state some sort > of resolution to this problem. So I know this is happening to others. > It's getting increasingly more frustrating since we have been running > samba as our file servers for Windows clients for years now and never > had this much of a problem with it crashing on us like this. Our > smb.conf file is pretty basic and really it is the one we have run since > we first started. Since we have not had a problem in the past this is > making me think it is more an external application, like one of our > databases possibly that is causing the SMBD process to build out of > control. We are open to any and all suggestions to help fix this from > happening anymore. > > smb.conf file: > > [global] > workgroup = XXX > server string = Samba Server > security = DOMAIN > log file = /var/log/samba/log > max log size = 100000 > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > dns proxy = No > ldap ssl = no > log level = 5 > load printers = No > kernel oplocks = No > > [homes] > comment = Home Directories > read only = No > browseable = No > available = No > > #[printers] > # comment = All Printers > # path = /var/spool/samba > # printable = Yes > # browseable = No > > [public_app] > comment = Public Data Repository > path = /var/local/group_shares/public_data > read only = No > create mask = 02775 > force create mode = 02775 > directory mask = 02775 > force directory mode = 02775 > > [prod_control] > comment = Production Control Repository > path = /var/local/group_shares/prod_control > read only = No > create mask = 02775 > force create mode = 02775 > directory mask = 02775 > force directory mode = 02775 > > > > -- > Matt Lung > > Midwest Tool & Die, Corp. > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba >---------------------------------- This e-mail may contain SEL confidential or legally privileged information. The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of SEL. Any unauthorized disclosure, distribution or other use is prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender, permanently delete it, and destroy any printed copies.