samba - Jun 2005 - Difference between smbclient&smbmount

Hi there,

We're currently having problems mounting share from a windows server 2003
machine.
The thing that I find surprising is about smbclient : in fact, I'm allowed
to
browse the share with the command smbclient :

# smbclient //adoc/pastel -U mathus%9g8e
Domain=[MIPIH] OS=[Windows Server 2003 3790] Server=[Windows Server 2003 5.2]
smb: \>

And when I try to mount this share with smbmount, here's what I get :

p-emapb:/# smbmount //adoc/pastel /adoc/ -o username=mathus,password=9g8e81ae
cli_negprot: SMB signing is mandatory and we have disabled it.
4000: protocol negotiation failed
SMB connection failed

Question : Isn't it the same underlying lib that smbclient and smbmount are
using ? How about the fact that I can access the share with only one of the
command ?

Thanks a lot.
Baptiste

--
Baptiste <Batmat> Mathus
BMathus at Free point fr
http://www.batmat.net
---------
Si chacun de nous a une id?e et que nous les partageons, nous
repartirons tous les deux avec deux id?es... C'est ?a le Libre.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Baptiste Mathus wrote:

| Question : Isn't it the same underlying lib that
| smbclient and smbmount are using ? How about the fact
| that I can access the share with only one of the
| command ?

Nope.  smbclient and the kernel smbfs module use
different code.  smbfs does not support smb signing.
The cifs fs does though from what I remember.







cheer,s jerry
====================================================================Alleviating
the pain of Windows(tm)      ------- http://www.samba.org
GnuPG Key                ----- http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
"I never saved anything for the swim back."     Ethan Hawk in Gattaca
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCnblAIR7qMdg1EfYRAgigAJ9CTrrz3u+5+xJHte4uC2UDSj1/xgCghsZs
XMiF3ZGZXEEi18mN3t1g50E=yCZF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----