samba - Nov 2003 - XFS + Samba 2.2.3a, unable to change permissions on shares

Skipped content of type multipart/mixed-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 254 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/20031111/3854e797/attachment.bin

I'm about to test samba 3.0 (on RH Linux 9.0) as a replacement for our 
windows NT 4.0 Domain Controller. We already run samba 2.2 on another 
machine (RH linux 7.3) and that system does all of our fileserving (+1TB).

My question is this: is there anything bad about combining samba as a 
domain controller and samba as a fileserver? Or should we have a samba DC 
on one system, and the samba fileserver on a different system? I'm leaning 
towards seperating the two systems, but I'd like a more concrete reason to 
do so than a feeling. 

Any tips or ideas? Does samba 3.0 as a domain controller need a lot of 
/etc/init.d/smb -stop and -starts? If so, then I don't want to put that on 
our fileserver.

Thanks in advance,

Alex

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi folks, I'm at a dead end on this one.  I really have no clue where to 
go from here. 

Any advice?

Sean Kennedy wrote:
> Symptoms:
>
> Unable to change permissions from win2k clients on folders/shares.  When
> change is attempted, they are silently ignored.
>
> Data:
> Win2k Domain controller ( AD enabled )
> Winbind ( to sync user/password lists )
> Redhat 8.0 with custom kernel ( xfs patched )
> Samba 2.2.3a
>
> Logs have ~10-20 of these messages as a direct result of my attempt to
> change permissions:
>
> [2003/11/11 09:54:44, 0] smbd/posix_acls.c:create_canon_ace_lists(823)
>   create_canon_ace_lists: unable to map SID
> S-2-6-31-3345428093-651377827-839522115-1192 to uid or gid.
> ( SIDs have been changed to protect the innocent )
>
> uname -a output:
>
> Linux stark 2.4.20-20.9.XFS1.3.1 #1 Sat Oct 11 15:23:43 CDT 2003 i686
> athlon i386 GNU/Linux
>
>
> That's all the data I can think of that would relate to this problem. 
I
> can also tell you I had the same problem on Debian ( woody ) and samba 3
> with xfs.
>
> Help is greatly apprecaited.
>

- -- 
Sean Kennedy
PGP public key: http://tpno.org/keys/0xFC1C377F.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/snRlIjyA6vwcN38RAkqdAJ9WJmKKrTXJJaoNcEHd9/hQ9ncYxQCZARkX
tEcVI2pSD6tnVvSIpVEe3xU=q8YK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----