Thank you all, for the advices and answers.
They are being very useful.
And I may not know a lot of things about Samba but I sure know why samba
was written for (cheers John!) :-)
BTW I am reading the Samba-HOWTO-Collection, thanks again.
I considered changing to LDAP but time was a problem (as usual), now I
will reconsider the LDAP idea.
I will use the Samba 3 new release as soon as possible, that's because I
have already started the migration process.
I am going slowly, and solving some problems that come up.
[]'s
Fernando
-----Mensagem original-----
De: Phil Brutsche [mailto:phil@optimumdata.com]
Enviada em: ter?a-feira, 16 de setembro de 2003 14:04
Para: fernando@puc-campinas.edu.br
Assunto: Re: [Samba] Is Samba ready for it?
--On Tuesday, September 16, 2003 8:54 AM -0300 Fernando Ribeiro
<fernando@puc-campinas.edu.br> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am migrating from WinNT 4 to Samba 3 beta3 in a production
> environment. It would be nice to have some advice, because I don't
> know if Samba is ready for assuming this ;-)
First piece of advice: don't use Samba 3 betas, *especially* when
release
candidates are available.
Second piece of advice: at this point in time don't use Samba 3 for
production unless you *need* functionality that's not in Samba 2.2.x.
Since you're looking at making Samba a PDC with BDCs, I would go with
Samba
3 RC3 or RC4.
> I never heard about any one that had something like this. This is kind
> of a big network so it will be 1 PDC (Samba) , 4 BDC's
> (Samba) and 2 File Servers (w2k). I will have a minimum of 800
> machines and 2000 users logging on to Samba. There are more users
> because of Internet Authentication. I have Samba 3 beta3 working with
> NIS and rsync synchronization of smbpasswd, no db backend. Is this a
> problem? And I can't find a solution for using account policy to block
> the user account after bad logins, pdbedit doesn't seem to work.
You should consider using LDAP as a password backend.
--
Phil Brutsche
phil@optimumdata.com
