samba - Dec 2001 - NT accounts lockup up

Hello,

I've just spent the last two days sifting through the archives of this
mailing list and although I found one or two references to my problem
I've been unable to find the solution. 

I'm running Samba 2.0.4b on two machines:

E3000/Solaris 2.5.1
E3500/Solaris 2.6

My clients are running under NT4.0 .

I'm using the mode security = server.

Everything works fine most of the time, but from time to time (more and more
often in fact), the NT password server refuses to authenticate the password
and I get the following message in the log file:
password server COLLOG01 rejected the password

On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, David Quinn wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've just spent the last two days sifting through the archives of this
> mailing list and although I found one or two references to my problem
> I've been unable to find the solution.
>
> I'm running Samba 2.0.4b on two machines:
>
> E3000/Solaris 2.5.1
> E3500/Solaris 2.6
>
> My clients are running under NT4.0 .
>
> I'm using the mode security = server.
>
> Everything works fine most of the time, but from time to time (more and
more
> often in fact), the NT password server refuses to authenticate the password
> and I get the following message in the log file:
> password server COLLOG01 rejected the password
Upgrade to 2.2.2 and switch to "security = domain".  I predict your
life will be much more stressful.








chau, jerry
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
 Hewlett-Packard                                     http://www.hp.com
 SAMBA Team                                       http://www.samba.org
 --                                            http://www.plainjoe.org
 "Sam's Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours" 2ed.      ISBN
0-672-32269-2
 --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca--

On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 12:15:58PM -0600, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> Upgrade to 2.2.2 and switch to "security = domain".  I predict
your
> life will be much more stressful.
But that would be bad.... I think you mean his life would be much
*less* stressful :-) :-).

Jeremy.