Hello all, Wondering if anyone can help me with this little issue. I installed two samba server at a client site. They were setup with share level security and all was fine. I than moved to user level security to increase security and resolve some password caching issues on the win98 clients( note only win 98 clients on this network). The second samba server is a hot stand by that sync with the primary files every two hours. Idea is that if the prim server fails the users can click on the backup server in network hood and get there files. Two day after the move to users level security the prime file server failed. HD controller issue. Instead of using the backup server they just called me at home. I got he prim back up and running but no clients could access the share on the prim or the backup. You could see both servers in the net hood but if you tried to access them you got a network device not available massage after about 30 seconds of waiting. I could mount shares from the prim to the backup via smbfs with no problem and could mount shared from both samba servers to a win 98 machine with no problem. On a hunch I moved back to share level security on both servers and they could access the shares again. I have tried re adding the users to the smbpasswd file via the smbpasswd program, uninstalling the samba components and reinstalling. The only updates to the win 98 clients were IE6, direct X 8A and all applicable patches for win 98 using the MS online updated thingy. The servers are Trustix 1.5 ( cut down RH6.2 with many updates) with Kernel 2.4.10, 3Com 905b NICs. Any help would be great. The client was happy but now................................. Thanks in advance Richard Houston Thanks Rich
Richard Houston
2001-Oct-24 10:19 UTC
win98 and samba 2.2.1 issue / Share Vs. User level access.
Very sorry about not having a subject. Thanks Rich> Hello all, > > Wondering if anyone can help me with this little > issue. > > I installed two samba server at a client site. > They were setup with share level security and all > was fine. I than moved to user level security to > increase security and resolve some password > caching issues on the win98 clients( note only win > 98 clients on this network). The second samba >server is a hot stand by that sync with the > primary files every two hours. Idea is that if > the prim server fails the users can click on the backup >server in network hood and get there files. > > Two day after the move to users level security the > prime file server failed. HD controller issue. > Instead of using the backup server they just > called me at home. I got he prim back up and > running but no clients could access the share on > the prim or the backup. You could see both servers > in the net hood but if you tried to access them > you got a network device not available massage > after about 30 seconds of waiting. I could mount >shares from the prim to the backup via smbfs with > no problem and could mount shared from both samba >servers to a win 98 machine with no problem. On a > hunch I moved back to share level security on both >servers and they could access the shares again. > > I have tried re adding the users to the smbpasswd > file via the smbpasswd program, uninstalling the >samba components and reinstalling. The only > updates to the win 98 clients were IE6, direct X > 8A and all applicable patches for win 98 using the > MS online updated thingy. > > The servers are Trustix 1.5 ( cut down RH6.2 with > many updates) with Kernel 2.4.10, 3Com 905b NICs. > > Any help would be great. The client was happy but > now................................. > > Thanks in advance > > Richard Houston > > > > > > Thanks > > Rich > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/sambaThanks Rich