samba-bugs at samba.org
2019-Oct-18 15:25 UTC
[Bug 14163] New: RSYNC_SSL_PORT env should be set for invocation of --rsh command
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14163
Bug ID: 14163
Summary: RSYNC_SSL_PORT env should be set for invocation of
--rsh command
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.3
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
Assignee: wayne at opencoder.net
Reporter: bjacke at samba.org
QA Contact: rsync-qa at samba.org
when running the rsync with -e/--rsh stunnel-rsync and an alternative port on
the command line (--port 12345), when this port should be communicated to the
"rsh" program to be evaluated, which could be simply done by setting
the
RSYNC_SSL_PORT environment variable in case the --port option was used with
rsync.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2020-Apr-06 02:41 UTC
[Bug 14163] RSYNC_SSL_PORT env should be set for invocation of --rsh command
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14163
Wayne Davison <wayne at opencoder.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #1 from Wayne Davison <wayne at opencoder.net> ---
I've committed code that sets an RSYNC_PORT value in the environment for any
daemon-over-rsh connections. The value will be "0" if the default port
is being
assumed, or the specified port number. This lets a script choose their own
default port while still being able to discern if the user manually requested
port 873.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2020-Apr-06 10:50 UTC
[Bug 14163] RSYNC_SSL_PORT env should be set for invocation of --rsh command
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14163
Bj?rn Jacke <bjacke at samba.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |---
--- Comment #2 from Bj?rn Jacke <bjacke at samba.org> ---
thanks but the default port handling does not work correctly yet. Calling rsync
like:
rsync --rsh=openssl-rsync -aiv HOST::module
without any port definition, rsync sets the env var RSYNC_PORT=873 for the
script. This is not what is desired here. Without an explicit port definition
rsync should not be set to 873. Setting it to 0 as you mentioned in your
commend would be fine.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2020-Apr-08 02:26 UTC
[Bug 14163] RSYNC_SSL_PORT env should be set for invocation of --rsh command
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14163
Wayne Davison <wayne at opencoder.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Wayne Davison <wayne at opencoder.net> ---
Fixed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Maybe Matching Threads
- [Bug 14160] New: rsynd in daemon mode should support haproxy proxy protocol
- blanks in filenames
- [Bug 2384] New: AllowUsers doesn't allow users sssd domain users with @ in
- [Bug 13912] New: Fix a few typos in rsync.yo
- [Announce] Samba 3.5.0pre1 Available for Download