samba-bugs at samba.org
2019-Oct-18 15:25 UTC
[Bug 14163] New: RSYNC_SSL_PORT env should be set for invocation of --rsh command
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14163 Bug ID: 14163 Summary: RSYNC_SSL_PORT env should be set for invocation of --rsh command Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayne at opencoder.net Reporter: bjacke at samba.org QA Contact: rsync-qa at samba.org when running the rsync with -e/--rsh stunnel-rsync and an alternative port on the command line (--port 12345), when this port should be communicated to the "rsh" program to be evaluated, which could be simply done by setting the RSYNC_SSL_PORT environment variable in case the --port option was used with rsync. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2020-Apr-06 02:41 UTC
[Bug 14163] RSYNC_SSL_PORT env should be set for invocation of --rsh command
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14163 Wayne Davison <wayne at opencoder.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #1 from Wayne Davison <wayne at opencoder.net> --- I've committed code that sets an RSYNC_PORT value in the environment for any daemon-over-rsh connections. The value will be "0" if the default port is being assumed, or the specified port number. This lets a script choose their own default port while still being able to discern if the user manually requested port 873. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2020-Apr-06 10:50 UTC
[Bug 14163] RSYNC_SSL_PORT env should be set for invocation of --rsh command
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14163 Bj?rn Jacke <bjacke at samba.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED |--- --- Comment #2 from Bj?rn Jacke <bjacke at samba.org> --- thanks but the default port handling does not work correctly yet. Calling rsync like: rsync --rsh=openssl-rsync -aiv HOST::module without any port definition, rsync sets the env var RSYNC_PORT=873 for the script. This is not what is desired here. Without an explicit port definition rsync should not be set to 873. Setting it to 0 as you mentioned in your commend would be fine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2020-Apr-08 02:26 UTC
[Bug 14163] RSYNC_SSL_PORT env should be set for invocation of --rsh command
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14163 Wayne Davison <wayne at opencoder.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Wayne Davison <wayne at opencoder.net> --- Fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Possibly Parallel Threads
- [Bug 14160] New: rsynd in daemon mode should support haproxy proxy protocol
- blanks in filenames
- [Bug 2384] New: AllowUsers doesn't allow users sssd domain users with @ in
- [Bug 13912] New: Fix a few typos in rsync.yo
- [Announce] Samba 3.5.0pre1 Available for Download