search for: invocation

On 17/11/2020 11:54, mj via samba wrote: > Hi, > > Checking a bit more today, as the two changes on DC4 have *still* not > propagated? to DC2/DC3, I discovered the > ?samba-tool drs uptodateness > command. > > I gives the following output, not sure what "unknown invocation ID" > means. I hope someone here is able to explain..? > > It's output: > >> root at dc2:~# samba-tool drs uptodateness >> Unknown invocation ID 556b2cb4-e576-48e2-bb7c-7f62caee84fc >> Unknown invocation ID 7281ff0f-5af2-4ded-bdaf-362f1545d221 >> Unknow...

Same as MJ and You. So you have 5 DC's running. > >>> Unknown invocation ID 556b2cb4-e576-48e2-bb7c-7f62caee84fc > >>> Unknown invocation ID 7281ff0f-5af2-4ded-bdaf-362f1545d221 > >>> Unknown invocation ID 82b24c02-16cb-4ed1-b68b-a047c26886a9 > >>> Unknown invocation ID b97cc603-6d03-4ad0-8629-be408fed8d69 > >>> Unknown in...

Hi, Checking a bit more today, as the two changes on DC4 have *still* not propagated to DC2/DC3, I discovered the samba-tool drs uptodateness command. I gives the following output, not sure what "unknown invocation ID" means. I hope someone here is able to explain..? It's output: > root at dc2:~# samba-tool drs uptodateness > Unknown invocation ID 556b2cb4-e576-48e2-bb7c-7f62caee84fc > Unknown invocation ID 7281ff0f-5af2-4ded-bdaf-362f1545d221 > Unknown invocation ID 82b24c02-16cb-4ed1...

Hi all, We are running a three DC samba AD, using 4.12.8 sernet packages. Very stable for years. Today at 12:30 my colleague moved two users from * CN=Users,DC=samba,DC=company,DC=com to * OU=disabled,DC=samba,DC=company,DC=com This change was done on the DC4 at 12:30 using LAM (ldap-account-manager version 7.3) Ever since that, my automated samba-tool ldapcmp scripts started reporting

Hi Folks, I'm trying to understand the model specification formalities for 'lme', and the documentation is leaving me a bit confused. Specifically, using the example dataset 'Orthodont' in the 'nlme' package, first I use the invocation given in the example shown by "?lme": > fm1 <- lme(distance ~ age, data = Orthodont) # random is ~ age Despite the Comment ("# random is ~ age"), > summary(fm1) says that [...] Random effects: Formula: ~age | Subject Structure: General positive-defini...

You forgot to reply to the list. Also CC'ing LLVMdev. On 3/12/10 1:41 PM, Edmund Grimley-Evans wrote: >>> clang -cc1 -triple thumbv7-eabi -O3 -target-cpu cortex-a8 t.c >>> -emit-llvm-bc >>> llc t.bc ... -view-legalize-dags >> You just answered your own question :). That will work quite nicely >> actually. > > Maybe it would if I knew exactly what

Duncan: I am only superficially familiar with LLVM structure. What I am trying to find out is if functions that have a single invocation are still found in the code during the compilation. In Open64 and other compilers, there is an early inlining pass that inlines all procedures that have a single invocation site. The reasoning is that if there is a single call to a procedure, then there is not downside to inlining it. Does LLVM u...

...model/model_generator.rb:16:in `create_migration_file'' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/thor-0.14.6/lib/thor/task.rb: 22:in `send'' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/thor-0.14.6/lib/thor/task.rb: 22:in `run'' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/thor-0.14.6/lib/thor/ invocation.rb:118:in `invoke_task'' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/thor-0.14.6/lib/thor/ invocation.rb:124:in `invoke_all'' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.7/lib/ active_support/dependencies.rb:239:in `map'' from /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/thor-0.14.6/...

...Method) at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.accept(PlainSocketImpl.java:384) - locked <0xfb518080> (a java.net.SocksSocketImpl) at java.net.ServerSocket.implAccept(ServerSocket.java:453) at java.net.ServerSocket.accept(ServerSocket.java:421) at org.jboss.invocation.pooled.server.PooledInvoker.run(PooledInvoker.java:240) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) "RMI TCP Accept-4444" daemon prio=10 tid=0x008af800 nid=0x2b runnable [0xed47f000..0xed47fbf0] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketAccept...

...t disable all verification runs. The IR verifier is run 3 times: once prior to any optimization work, once between running the module passes and running the function passes, and finally at the end of all optimization prior to writing out optimized IR. -disable-verify knocks out the first and last invocations of the verifier, but leaves the middle invocation in. You can see this by throwing -debug-pass=Executions and running in a debugger. There is a noticeable pause between running the module and function passes. If you backtrace during this pause, you will see that you are in the verifier. If I acco...

...s ran with pupdate against our production port (we have a port for developement/testing). We also could decipher false positives if puppet was ran with tags where a host could be consistent against some tag(s), but may not be consistent against all. Our thought was to add an option (call it --invocation) to pass in whatever you like and have :invocation passed along to the yaml report. Any thoughts on how to accomplish this would be appreciated. Thanks, -Steve

Hi, I am trying to use the CSPADE function as part of the ArulesSequences package. When running with my own data I get a system invocation error, and also get the same when running the built in example with the zaki data: > example(cspade) And get the following error: preprocessing ...Error in cspade(zaki, parameter = list(support = 0.4), control = list(verbose = TRUE)) : system invocation failed I read on a site saying that...

I need to have multiple invocations of dovecot running, one for productions and then one or more for test/dev, doing things like trying different authentication methods, getting quota working, etc. I knew how to do this with inetd, but I have been convinced that direct invocation is preferable, so I need to know how to do multi...

* Hamcrest-style parameter matchers * Values returned and exceptions raised on consecutive invocations * Yields on consecutive invocations * Multiple yields on single invocation * Invocation dispatch fixed * Deprecated returning result of a Proc -- James. http://blog.floehopper.org

Hi, how do I compile c code from a char array in clang? Im using code from the interpreter example. Thanks. char *cCode; // the char array // fill array with code goes here... // Initialize a compiler invocation object from the clang (-cc1) arguments. const driver::ArgStringList &CCArgs = Cmd->getArguments(); llvm::OwningPtr<CompilerInvocation> CI(new CompilerInvocation); CompilerInvocation::CreateFromArgs(*CI, const_cast<const char **>(CCArgs.d...

...ls/llvm-c-test/CMakeFiles/llvm-c-test.dir/object.c.o [100%] Building C object tools/llvm-c-test/CMakeFiles/llvm-c-test.dir/targets.c.o [100%] Linking CXX executable ../../bin/llvm-c-test clang: error: unable to execute command: Killed clang: error: linker command failed due to signal (use -v to see invocation) tools/llvm-lto/CMakeFiles/llvm-lto.dir/build.make:211: recipe for target 'bin/llvm-lto' failed make[2]: *** [bin/llvm-lto] Error 254 CMakeFiles/Makefile2:21155: recipe for target 'tools/llvm-lto/CMakeFiles/llvm-lto.dir/all' failed make[1]: *** [tools/llvm-lto/CMakeFiles/llvm-lto.di...

Are LoopPasses allowed to maintain state between runOnLoop invocations? The documentation is not clear on this point. -Dave

Hi Nelson, > What I am trying to find out is if functions that have a single invocation are > still found in the code during the compilation. I'm pretty sure that static functions with a single invocation are always inlined. If doing link-time optimization, then pretty much any function with a single invocation will be inlined. I'm not sure what this has to do with &quot...

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1082 Summary: xauth list invocation has bogus "." argument Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.2p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: NetBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org...

...y, you can pass -DCMAKE_INSTALL_DO_STRIP=1 to cmake to request stripping. The install-* targets set up by LLVM's build system don't seem to have any provision for this though, as far as I can tell. I also can't figure out a way to pass cmake this option apart from just putting it in the invocation (and the cmake invocation here is controlled by the install-* target). I could go ahead and change the cmake invocation in all the install-* targets to (conditionally) enable stripping, but the creation of the various install-* targets is spread throughout the build system (a quick grep shows at l...