samba-bugs at samba.org
2016-Mar-27 10:52 UTC
[Bug 11812] New: rsync without --verbose still writes "(new) backup_dir is ..." to STDOUT
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11812 Bug ID: 11812 Summary: rsync without --verbose still writes "(new) backup_dir is ..." to STDOUT Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter: mi.lists.bugzilla at alma.ch QA Contact: rsync-qa at samba.org rsync always writes "(new) backup_dir is ..." to STDOUT. Is this really necessary? rsync -a --delete --backup --backup-dir="_before-$(date +%F)" $source $dest (new) backup_dir is _before-2016-03-27 This seems to have appeared in 3.1.1, which created the directory even if it was not needed (see bug #11423). Version 3.1.2 doesn't create useless backup-dirs any more, but if it does it reports it to STDOUT which is also quite useless. We have --verbose when we want to check what is going on. If everything works alright, I feel that rsync without -v should remain silent, as is customary in Unix tools. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2016-Apr-17 18:09 UTC
[Bug 11812] rsync without --verbose still writes "(new) backup_dir is ..." to STDOUT
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11812 Wayne Davison <wayned at samba.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Wayne Davison <wayned at samba.org> --- Yeah, that print needs this check: if (INFO_GTE(BACKUP, 1)) Fix committed to git (0f7db203fb4125e9ec8851bb0ff8878258fc4a05). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.