search for: customary

Hi, Is there a way to check whether a file is empty in R. I did the customary searches, but did not find anything. Please cc me on any reply. Thanks, Faheem.

I''m new to Rails (and liking it!) and I have multiple controllers, each of which has a method which uses a view template which is identical to what the others use. I would like to be able to have just one template to maintain that they can all use. What is the customary way to do this? I tried using render_action to specify the template explicitly, and it "works". But I would like to be able to redirect to this method without getting a "Can only render or redirect once per action" error. Thanks for any assistance! -Steve Bergman -- Pos...

...and there are a few things I'm wondering about: - We can specify parameters to the mailbox (s, b or u) to select which prompts to play. However, if we specify 'b' or 'u' it plays that (customisable) message, but it also plays the voicemail instructions. For the dutch, it is customary that a user creates their own message which includes 'please leave your message after the tone' or similar, so the generic message is undesirable (or should be override-able). Is there something in the apps I've missed that allows this already ? - In voicemailmain2 there is no optio...

...ed files in the database as I have done previously. It seems more "natural" to simply store them in a directory. Now I''m thinking that it would be nice to be able to take advantage of ActiveRecord anyway - override a couple of methods, so that I can define the associations in the customary way and rely on the automatic saving features, etc. Has anybody done that? Which methods would I need to override? Or is this not feasible? Thanks. -Sebastian --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby...

...e { >>>>>> + u64 start; >>>>>> + u64 end; >>>>>> +}; >>>>>> + >>>>> >>>>> This is ambiguous. Is end in the range or just behind it? >>>>> How about first/last? >>>> It is customary in the kernel to use start-end where end corresponds to >>>> the byte following the last in the range. See struct vm_area_struct >>>> vm_start and vm_end fields >>> Exactly my point: >>> >>> include/linux/mm_types.h: unsigned long vm_end;...

...e { >>>>>> + u64 start; >>>>>> + u64 end; >>>>>> +}; >>>>>> + >>>>> >>>>> This is ambiguous. Is end in the range or just behind it? >>>>> How about first/last? >>>> It is customary in the kernel to use start-end where end corresponds to >>>> the byte following the last in the range. See struct vm_area_struct >>>> vm_start and vm_end fields >>> Exactly my point: >>> >>> include/linux/mm_types.h: unsigned long vm_end;...

On systems even key systems it is customary to have an 'internal' dial tone. Since Asterisk simply ignores the 9 and keeps the tone going it is hard to tell for some 'new users' if they can make a call. My first idea was to change the generated dial tone via source. Then if the user presses 9 go to a different context...

...alue of GCV at 0.003 > ##let's choose 0.03 for lambda > coef(gr)[gr$lam == 0.03,] GNP.deflator GNP Unemployed Armed.Forces Population Year -1620.429355 0.021060 0.007994 -0.013146 -0.007752 -0.101880 0.869116 But how does one obtain the customary 'lm' summary information for the model above? I tried supplying the chosen lambda to Design::ols() using its 'penalty' argument, but strangely the results differ. See below. > require(Design) > Design::ols(Employed ~ GNP.deflator + GNP + Unemployed + Armed.Forces + Population...

...e is accepted but nodiratime and noiversion are not. 2. Command path completion. Add a note in the documentation that this does not work. For example when the user types cd <sshfs mount point>/ then tab and tab, nothing is listed as it is for the usual file systems. Rationale: this is not customary behaviour. Nice for there to be no surprises for the user who has read the documentation. Nice for the user who finds and investigates unusual behaviour to have it confirmed as normal in the documentation. Best, Charles

Under Aix directories have the mode 024xxxx instead of the customary 04xxxx. Because of this when you sync a directory to or from an Aix system it's never up to date. Here is a patch which fixes this. It causes rsync to look at only the bits that chmod actually influences, 07777, when deciding whether or not the modes differ. I was surprised there wasn't...

I understand that it is customary for SIP User Agents to send OPTIONS packets every now and then to check that a peer is still alive and well. Indeed I understand that Asterisk itself sends them if qualify is set to yes in the peer configuration. How is one supposed to configure the dialplan so that Asterisk responds correctly...

...is from > 2016, whereas https://reviews.llvm.org/p/efriedma/ has recent activity. > Hopefully that gets you some activity. Thanks a lot! That seems like an easy trap to run into. Is there a way to not suggest the old accounts (in the drop-down menu) when adding reviewers? > It's also customary to add llvm-commits > as a subscriber instead of a reviewer, but that shouldn't make too much of a > difference. Thanks, I'll try to remember this for next time. I did this based on the following text in [the docs](https://llvm.org/docs/Phabricator.html#phabricator-request-review-web...

...y field (medicine), I rarely see any explicit description of whether, and if so how, model fit was assessed and assumptions checked. Mostly the results sections are all about hypothesis testing on model coefficients. Is this common in other disciplines? Are there fields of study in which it is customary to provide a discussion of model adequacy, either in the text or perhaps in an online appendix? And if that discussion is not provided, what, if anything, can one conclude about whether, and how well, it was done? Is it sort of taken as a given that those diagnostic checks were carried out? Do...

...is defined in function `dist' (standard library `mva') as sum(|x_i - y_i| / |x_i + y_i|) Obviously this is undefined for cases where both x_i and y_i are zeros. Since double zeros are common in many data sets, this is a nuisance. In our field (from which the distance is coming), it is customary to remove double zeros: contribution to distance is zero when both x_i and y_i are zero. Could it be possible to have this kind of feature in R as well? It seems that this would do the trick without breaking applications where double zeros do not occur: --- R-1.2.2/src/appl/distance.c Sun Oct...

...is defined in function `dist' (standard library `mva') as sum(|x_i - y_i| / |x_i + y_i|) Obviously this is undefined for cases where both x_i and y_i are zeros. Since double zeros are common in many data sets, this is a nuisance. In our field (from which the distance is coming), it is customary to remove double zeros: contribution to distance is zero when both x_i and y_i are zero. Could it be possible to have this kind of feature in R as well? It seems that this would do the trick without breaking applications where double zeros do not occur: --- R-1.2.2/src/appl/distance.c Sun Oct...

I'm attempting to use clang/llvm to compile some legacy C code, and am running into a strange issue. There are several functions in my codebase which make use of the __inline keyword, but do not include the customary static keyword along with it. When I compile these files, the generated code appears not to have any of the function definitions in it--just undefined references to external symbols. Specifically, if I have the following test program: __inline int foo() { return 5; } int bar() { return foo(...

From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> The zImage compatible binary is the useful one on real hardware. The relocated ELF thing is only really useful when booting directly on Fast Models. The customary suffix for that case is .axf so provide that as a target. Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> Cc: Wookey <wookey@linaro.org> --- xen/arch/arm/Makefile | 13 ++++--------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/Makefile b/xen/arch/a...

Hi all, I submitted a small documentation patch [1] three weeks ago. This is my first patch submitted against LLVM, so I was extra careful to follow the instructions (turns out this is quite a bit more complicated than the pull-request-based workflow). So far, I got no reaction at all to my patch. Does that mean I did something wrong, like picking the wrong reviewer? Should I pick another

Sorry, I don't use Windows... can't help there. It's customary to keep cc'ing the list on these sorts of things so someone with a more similar platform/ more expertise can take the issue up if needed. Maybe someone else will be able to help you out. Michael On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 9:05 AM, geo theory <geotheory1 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi there &...

On Fri, 01 Jul 2016, Markus Mayer <mmayer at broadcom.com> wrote: > Add a function called strtolower() to convert strings to lower case > in-place, overwriting the original string. > > This seems to be a recurring requirement in the kernel that is > currently being solved by several duplicated implementations doing the > same thing. > > Signed-off-by: Markus Mayer