samba-bugs at samba.org
2015-Feb-20 20:45 UTC
[Bug 11111] New: Describe the interaction between --one-file-system and --delete-excluded
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11111 Bug ID: 11111 Summary: Describe the interaction between --one-file-system and --delete-excluded Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter: bill+samba at bfccomputing.com QA Contact: rsync-qa at samba.org Created attachment 10762 --> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=10762&action=edit rsync.yo patch for: rsync --one-file-system --delete-excluded --exclude=/bar/ host:/bar/ /foo where /bar is a mounted filesystem, document that ignoring a sender's "other" filesystem does not affect the operation of --delete-excluded at the matching receiver's patch (/foo/bar). I ran into this under a pile of scripts where the backups first backed up /foo, then /foo/bar, then /foo/baz, and the underlying volume's CoW snapshots were quickly gaining size because /foo was listed in the excludes (first deleted, then re-populated). The current documentation isn't wrong - just being explicit would help eliminate this as a gotcha. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2015-Feb-20 20:50 UTC
[Bug 11111] Describe the interaction between --one-file-system and --delete-excluded
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11111 --- Comment #1 from Bill McGonigle <bill+samba at bfccomputing.com> --- argh - messed up the reduced example. Should be host:/ rsync --one-file-system --delete-excluded --exclude=/bar/ host:/ /foo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.