similar to: [Bug 11111] New: Describe the interaction between --one-file-system and --delete-excluded

I encountered an issue that people using OS-X systems as NFS clients need to be aware of. While not strictly a ZFS issue, it may be encounted most often by ZFS users since ZFS makes it easy to support and export per-user filesystems. The problem I encountered was when using ZFS to create exported per-user filesystems and the OS-X automounter to perform the necessary mount magic. OS-X

[previously sent to rhelv5 list, apologies to those on both] I've got a problem I can reproduce easily enough, but really I fail to understand what's going wrong. I've got a 5.3 Dom0, which is running three guests. One is Fedora 10, that runs with local flat files, and works fine. One is Nexenta 2 (opensolaris-based), and that runs off of physical partitions, and seems to work

Hi All ; What is the status of ZFS on linux and what are the kernel''s supported? Regards Mertol <http://www.sun.com/> http://www.sun.com/emrkt/sigs/6g_top.gif Mertol Ozyoney Storage Practice - Sales Manager Sun Microsystems, TR Istanbul TR Phone +902123352200 Mobile +905339310752 Fax +902123352222 Email <mailto:Ayca.Yalcin at Sun.COM> mertol.ozyoney at

Hi, Folks, I recently migrated from courier-imapd to dovecot when I migrated a machine from rh9 to fc5. I managed to hit a snag with the 1.0b8 version of dovecot that's currently in fc5. With AppleMail 1.3 I was seeing most of my incoming mail go missing. To make a long story short, AppleMail was applying mail filters inappropriately (walking right past a 'stop processing'

Hi, all, I'm attempting to run a Windows 2003 (32-bit) VM under CentOS 5.4, generally following: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/KVM I've seen nice performance benefits with the VirtIO driver under Fedora, so I'd like to get that running with CentOS as well. I have the September drivers build .iso. According to: http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Virtio I need a KVM version 60

This is a Redhat 9 box doing nightly updates from FedoraLegacy.org. I have a script of the whole session if needed. -Bill ---- ok transfer data run test banner.sh ... test banner: missing banner file cmp: EOF on /home/flowerpt/src/openssh/openssh/regress/empty.in missing banner file test banner: size 0 cmp: EOF on /home/flowerpt/src/openssh/openssh/regress/banner.in banner size 0 mismatch test

Hi all, Anybody could me tell when CentoOS7 will have Xen support? Thank a lot

Hi all, I thought I?d post this in case any one has issues similar to mine. First, my initial email to the list which I didn?t send; I?m trying to run a KVM based guest OS off of a mirrored ZFS dataset. It won?t run with errors "invalid argument..", but will run when on the root volume, or when that ZFS dataset has been removed in favor of an EXT4 volumes. Thanks in advance, PS I

how do i know what the root partition is? i gave the option: root="/dev/hda" in the config file. Thanks & Regards, Siddharth Wagh ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To ensure perfect aim, shoot first and call whatever you hit the target... -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is my first post here, and i hope it is ok that i posted in this thread. I have been doing a bit of reading on the solaris platforms, and seem to be inclined to try out the open solaris os or solaris 10. My only worry is that my lack of knowledge with the command line may make this difficult regarding trouble shooting. It seems fairly straighforward creating zpools etc, but maybe nexenta is

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2143 Bug ID: 2143 Summary: X11 forwarding for ipv4 is broken when ipv6 is disabled on the loopback interface Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.3p1 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5

Hi, all, I think I''m missing a concept with import and export. I''m working on installing a Nexenta b134 system under Xen, and I have to run the installer under hvm mode, then I''m trying to get it back up under pv mode. In that process the controller names change, and that''s where I''m getting tripped up. I do a successful install, then I boot OK,

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4082 Summary: RFE: prioritize work by size (or other criteria) Product: rsync Version: 2.6.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3701 Summary: rsync_xal_set: lsetxattr system.posix_acl_default failed: Permission denied Product: rsync Version: 2.6.7 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:

Hi, I have a particular directory in my exclude list, but I want it excluded from --delete-excluded. Is this possible. or maybe if I explain what I'm trying to do, someone will come up with a more suitable way. I am using rsync (2.6.6) to backup data from a Windows Server (cygwin) to an OpenBSD box. rsync -rtvz --delete-excluded --del --timeout=3600 -e "ssh -i c:\cygwin\ssh-key"

Begin forwarded message: > From: Karel Kulhavy <clock@twibright.com> > Date: 7 March 2006 18:01:43 > To: Martin Pool <mbp@samba.org> > Subject: Delete some excluded files in rsync > > Hello > > I suggest that a feature be added into rsync. That one could > separately > specify excluded files that should be deleted on the receiver and > excluded files

Hi rsync gurus! [Please Cc: me, as I am NOT subscribed to the list!] First the data points: debian/woody, local server=i386 arch, remote is alpha arch rsync version on both debian 2.5.5-0.2 While upgrading our server to a raid we were hit by a bug which I really consider very strange: The option -n/--dry-run does NOT change files, but DELETE files when called with --delete. Test case I had: $

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 ------- Comment #8 from bill+samba@bfccomputing.com 2008-11-30 17:24 CST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Thanks. This will be especially useful for log directories where logrotate is > incrementing the filename number at each rotation period (httpd.10.gz -> > httpd.11.gz). Since I mentioned this specific use case, I should

I am using the following command and the excluded directory /usr/share/doc/ still appears with all it's contents in the backup directory when it's contents should be deleted. Is this a bug or am I doing something wrong? rsync --delete --delete-excluded -a -R --exclude="/proc/*" --exclude="/dev/*" --exclude="/usr/share/doc/*" --exclude="/backup*"

Hi all, I am trying to write a script based on rsync to help users select what they want to mirror, what they want to skip and what they want to delete on the remote side. Let's say that I have 1 directory per release: r1.0 r1.1 r2.0 r2.1 r3.1 r3.2 r4.0 r4.1 At some point I have mirrored all of them, but now I want to be able to tell rsync to: - remove all r1.* and r2.* releases - skip