samba-bugs at samba.org
2015-Feb-20  20:45 UTC
[Bug 11111] New: Describe the interaction between --one-file-system and --delete-excluded
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11111
            Bug ID: 11111
           Summary: Describe the interaction between --one-file-system and
                     --delete-excluded
           Product: rsync
           Version: 3.1.1
          Hardware: All
                OS: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P5
         Component: core
          Assignee: wayned at samba.org
          Reporter: bill+samba at bfccomputing.com
        QA Contact: rsync-qa at samba.org
Created attachment 10762
  --> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=10762&action=edit
rsync.yo patch
for:
  rsync --one-file-system --delete-excluded --exclude=/bar/ host:/bar/ /foo
where /bar is a mounted filesystem, 
document that ignoring a sender's "other" filesystem does not
affect the
operation of --delete-excluded at the matching receiver's patch (/foo/bar).
I ran into this under a pile of scripts where the backups first backed up /foo,
then /foo/bar, then /foo/baz, and the underlying volume's CoW snapshots were
quickly gaining size because /foo was listed in the excludes (first deleted,
then re-populated).
The current documentation isn't wrong - just being explicit would help
eliminate this as a gotcha.
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2015-Feb-20  20:50 UTC
[Bug 11111] Describe the interaction between --one-file-system and --delete-excluded
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11111 --- Comment #1 from Bill McGonigle <bill+samba at bfccomputing.com> --- argh - messed up the reduced example. Should be host:/ rsync --one-file-system --delete-excluded --exclude=/bar/ host:/ /foo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.