samba-bugs at samba.org
2014-May-09 17:45 UTC
[Bug 10601] New: Retry Delay for Vanished Files/Directories
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10601 Summary: Retry Delay for Vanished Files/Directories Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: samba at haravikk.com QAContact: rsync-qa at samba.org Pretty much as the title says; it'd be nice if we had some kind of configurable retry delay when rsync encounters a vanished file/folder. This would be especially useful in cases involving mounted remote volumes, as it would mean rsync could instead pause and try again in cases where the mounted volume is temporarily disconnected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2014-May-09 19:25 UTC
[Bug 10601] Retry Delay for Vanished Files/Directories
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10601 --- Comment #1 from Haravikk <samba at haravikk.com> 2014-05-09 19:25:27 UTC --- Just wanted to add that it may make sense to separate the retry somehow so that folders can be retried while files are skipped, for example, as backups of an in-use hierarchy will be more likely to encounter files that vanish rather than entire directories, so it may be worthwhile skipping the retry delay for files in such cases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Apparently Analagous Threads
- [Bug 11474] New: Retry delay for lost connection
- [Bug 10575] New: Long Delay for Large Folders Even with Incremental File-List
- [Bug 10379] New: rsync metadata files
- [Bug 10579] New: --xattr internal abbrev error
- Should I worry about the "vanished files" warning?