Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "[Bug 10601] New: Retry Delay for Vanished Files/Directories"
2015 Aug 30
0
[Bug 11474] New: Retry delay for lost connection
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11474
Bug ID: 11474
Summary: Retry delay for lost connection
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component: core
Assignee: wayned at samba.org
Reporter: samba at
2014 Apr 29
3
[Bug 10575] New: Long Delay for Large Folders Even with Incremental File-List
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10575
Summary: Long Delay for Large Folders Even with Incremental
File-List
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
2014 Jan 14
2
[Bug 10379] New: rsync metadata files
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10379
Summary: rsync metadata files
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
ReportedBy: me at haravikk.com
QAContact:
2014 Apr 30
1
[Bug 10579] New: --xattr internal abbrev error
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10579
Summary: --xattr internal abbrev error
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: Mac OS X
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P5
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
ReportedBy: samba at haravikk.com
2017 Sep 07
2
Should I worry about the "vanished files" warning?
Hi
I would like to ask, when the "vanished files" warning is a sign that something bad is happening somewhere. I know that the `rsync-no-vanished` script can silence the warning, but I am wondering whether this is a sane thing to do.
My guess based on https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3653#c26 and https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10356 is that it's fine, but
2013 Jul 27
1
[Bug 10051] New: Improved long file-name handling
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10051
Summary: Improved long file-name handling
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
ReportedBy: me at haravikk.com
QAContact:
2008 Mar 06
2
rsync: Please add an option to ignore vanished files
Hi Everyone,
The following request was received from a Debian user; could you
comment on it? I think this seems reasonable, although the cron
output can be fixed by writing to a temporary file and using grep -v.
(The temporary file is necessary to avoid discarding the exit code,
although that may not be needed in the case of rsync, since it writes
that to stderr).
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at
2014 Mar 20
1
[Bug 10507] New: Structured Output (for Simpler Parsing)
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10507
Summary: Structured Output (for Simpler Parsing)
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
ReportedBy: me at haravikk.com
2013 May 07
4
[Bug 9864] New: Allow permanent compression of destination files
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9864
Summary: Allow permanent compression of destination files
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
ReportedBy: me at haravikk.com
2017 Nov 16
4
[Bug 13147] New: inconsistent behaviour regaring vanished files information
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13147
Bug ID: 13147
Summary: inconsistent behaviour regaring vanished files
information
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.9
Hardware: x64
OS: Mac OS X
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P5
Component: core
Assignee:
2012 Nov 05
2
Issues with VANISHED CHANGEDSINCE
I've been seeing the following wonky behavior with Dovecot. Currently
this is with Dovecot 2.0.19, but I was also seeing it in earlier
versions as well, including versions from the 1.x series. Some
background, this is from Horde's ActiveSync library, when it is trying
to determine what UIDs have recently been expunged. I can guarantee
that when this command was sent, there was
2013 Apr 18
1
[Bug 9814] New: --cache parameter for storing recent file data
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9814
Summary: --cache parameter for storing recent file data
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
ReportedBy: me at haravikk.com
2016 Jan 13
0
[Bug 11671] New: --files-from= with nonexistant files and --delete-missing-args complains about vanished source files
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11671
Bug ID: 11671
Summary: --files-from= with nonexistant files and
--delete-missing-args complains about vanished source
files
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.1
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
2008 May 18
1
Some files vanished...
I run an rsync to backup my mail server ever 4 hours. Sometimes, I
get these sorts of warnings:
Rsyncing...
file has vanished: "/usr/local/virtual/*munged1*/new/
1210876129.43402_0.mail.server.tld"
file has vanished: "/usr/local/virtual/*munged2*/courierimapkeywords/.
4036254.1210876052.43312_0.mail.server.tld"
file has vanished: "/usr/local/virtual/*munged3*/cur/
2023 Jan 27
2
[nbdkit PATCH 0/2] retry: add support for retrying .open
In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1841820, it was pointed
out that the retry filter not retrying .open means that an ssh
connection (such as in a vmx+ssh v2v conversion) fails when the ssh
connection itself cannot be retried. A year ago, this was an inherent
limitation of our retry implementation; but in the meantime, my work
to allow filters to open independent backends has made it
2006 Oct 12
5
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4168] New: Random file has vanished when syncing clock with ntpdate/hwclock ?
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4168
Summary: Random file has vanished when syncing clock with
ntpdate/hwclock ?
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.4
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
2005 Oct 12
2
Vanished Files issue/enhancement
Hi Rsync/Samba team,
First of all, cudos on rsync 2.6.6! It is running exceptionally well.
I'm using a script executed by cron to keep warm-backup servers in sync
with the primary server. The execution is set to run every 5 minutes.
Like any good programmer, this process is *very* paranoid and uses
'wall' to notify the users if any error occurs during the transmissions.
This is
2017 Sep 07
0
Should I worry about the "vanished files" warning?
All it means is that rsync saw a file that needed transferring but the
file was gone when rsync actually tried to open it. So look at the
filenames and decide if it is a problem or not.
On 09/07/2017 10:27 AM, Vangelis Katsikaros via rsync wrote:
> Hi
>
> I would like to ask, when the "vanished files" warning is a sign that something bad is happening somewhere. I know that
2007 Dec 07
1
exit code for vanished files in 2.6.9
I am using rsync 2.6.9 (as currently packaged in Mandriva 2007.1)
Ever since the latest update of the package I have been getting an exit
code of 23 with the output "file has vanished: {filename}".
For partial transfers due to vanished files, I (and my script) would
expect exit code 24.
(man page)
23 Partial transfer due to error
24 Partial transfer due to vanished source
2014 Apr 26
0
[Bug 10567] New: --abort option to halt transfer on error(s)
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10567
Summary: --abort option to halt transfer on error(s)
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
ReportedBy: me at haravikk.com