samba-bugs at samba.org
2014-Mar-28 18:41 UTC
[Bug 10522] New: --detect-renamed patch is causing deletions as if a 'delete flag' was supplied, when none have been
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10522 Summary: --detect-renamed patch is causing deletions as if a 'delete flag' was supplied, when none have been Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Platform: x86 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: haqthat at gmail.com QAContact: rsync-qa at samba.org Scenario: Files are being deleted, even though no 'delete' flags are given. Patch rsync 3.1.1pre1 with detect-renamed patch configure make mkdir /tmp/test1 mkdir /tmp/test2 touch /tmp/test1/a touch /tmp/test1/b touch /tmp/test1/c touch /tmp/test2/a touch /tmp/test2/x touch /tmp/test2/y touch /tmp/test2/z rsync -rvzhtSin /tmp/test1/ /tmp/test2/ "building file list ... done *deleting z *deleting y *deleting x .d..t...... ./>f..t...... a >f+++++++++ b >f+++++++++ c-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2014-Mar-28 19:10 UTC
[Bug 10522] --detect-renamed patch is causing deletions as if a 'delete flag' was supplied, when none have been
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10522 --- Comment #1 from John Pierman <haqthat at gmail.com> 2014-03-28 19:10:39 UTC --- I'm sorry typo'd the rsync command, left out the --detect-renamed flag. Should be rsync -rvzhtSin --detect-renamed /tmp/test1/ /tmp/test2/ (In reply to comment #0)> Scenario: > > Files are being deleted, even though no 'delete' flags are given. > > Patch rsync 3.1.1pre1 with detect-renamed patch > configure > make > > mkdir /tmp/test1 > mkdir /tmp/test2 > touch /tmp/test1/a > touch /tmp/test1/b > touch /tmp/test1/c > touch /tmp/test2/a > touch /tmp/test2/x > touch /tmp/test2/y > touch /tmp/test2/z > > rsync -rvzhtSin /tmp/test1/ /tmp/test2/ > > "building file list ... done > *deleting z > *deleting y > *deleting x > .d..t...... ./ > >f..t...... a > >f+++++++++ b > >f+++++++++ c-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2014-Apr-10 02:49 UTC
[Bug 10522] --detect-renamed patch is causing deletions as if a 'delete flag' was supplied, when none have been
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10522 --- Comment #2 from J.R. <rsnc at opal.com> 2014-04-10 02:49:02 UTC --- I can confirm this problem. I suggest increasing the Severity of this bug to "Critical" because it causes data to be lost without the user requesting this. The problem is that a small section of code was lost from detect-renamed.diff between 3.0.9 and 3.1.0: --- delete.c.orig 2013-01-19 14:05:53.000000000 -0500 +++ delete.c 2014-04-09 22:35:59.000000000 -0400 @@ -153,6 +161,9 @@ /* OK: try to delete the directory. */ } + if (flags & DEL_NO_DELETIONS) + return DR_SUCCESS; + if (!(flags & DEL_MAKE_ROOM) && max_delete >= 0 && stats.deleted_files>= max_delete) {skipped_deletes++; return DR_AT_LIMIT; Putting that back fixes this problem. I will attach a complete detect-renamed.diff that includes this correction. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2014-Apr-10 02:50 UTC
[Bug 10522] --detect-renamed patch is causing deletions as if a 'delete flag' was supplied, when none have been
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10522 --- Comment #3 from J.R. <rsnc at opal.com> 2014-04-10 02:50:13 UTC --- Created attachment 9840 --> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=9840 revised patch detect-renamed.diff -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2014-Apr-13 18:02 UTC
[Bug 10522] --detect-renamed patch is causing deletions as if a 'delete flag' was supplied, when none have been
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10522 Wayne Davison <wayned at samba.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Wayne Davison <wayned at samba.org> 2014-04-13 18:02:08 UTC --- Thanks for the detection work. When the patch was revised for 3.1.0 that check was apparently left in the generator.c file instead of migrating to delete.c. I added in the check in the right place in delete.c and also removed the unmigrated check that was being added to generator.c. This fix will be in the patches for 3.1.1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Possibly Parallel Threads
- rsync: mkstemp ... No such file or directory mangled dirname
- rsync gui?
- HiddenStore option may be useful
- rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(463)
- [Bug 8847] New: detect-renamed.diff update to ensure existence of directory for partial-dir