is there a way to save special flags in freebsd when using rsync? for example dd# ls -lo init -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel schg 711744 Mar 12 18:51 init dd# file has flag schg when i just use rsync it copy that file and loses that flag -- http://alexus.org/
On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 22:12 -0400, alexus wrote:> is there a way to save special flags in freebsd when using rsync? > > for example > > dd# ls -lo init > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel schg 711744 Mar 12 18:51 init > dd# > > > file has flag schg > > > when i just use rsync it copy that file and loses that flagThe --fileflags option provided by the maintained patch "fileflags.diff" preserves those flags. The rsync 3.0.5 version of this patch is at: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/patches/fileflags.diff -- Matt
Its an option when you install the port.
Regards
Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: "alexus" <alexus@gmail.com>
To: <rsync@lists.samba.org>
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 2:12 AM
Subject: rsync flags freebsd
> is there a way to save special flags in freebsd when using rsync?
>
> for example
>
> dd# ls -lo init
> -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel schg 711744 Mar 12 18:51 init
> dd#
>
>
> file has flag schg
>
>
> when i just use rsync it copy that file and loses that flag
>
>
> --
> http://alexus.org/
> --
> Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
> To unsubscribe or change options:
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
> Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
>
===============================================This e.mail is private and
confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is
addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using,
copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in
it.
In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please
telephone +44 845 868 1337
or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk.
On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 16:44 -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 06:57:15PM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote: > > I would have thought it more natural to have branches "patches-master" > > and "patches-3.0.x" in the main repository. Is there any reason you > > made a separate repository? > > Yes, this way the branch names matchWhat difference does that make?> and I can tag releases.You can do that with a single repository using a prefix ("patches-v3.0.5") or a subdirectory ("patches/v3.0.5"). It seems to me that the only real difference is that using a single repository makes it slightly less work for people to mirror both "vanilla" rsync and the maintained patches while making it harder for people to mirror one without mirroring the other (though I do not see why that would be a requirement). I want to mirror both, so you can guess where I stand. -- Matt