David Kahn
2011-Feb-03 14:18 UTC
[rspec-users] Is there a way to tell rspec not to fail the test while in debugger?
I am curious as with Test::Unit I could go into the debugger and stay all day inside of a test and make all kinds of errors without a problem. With rspec I experience that if I make a bad query/ActiveRecord call that it flips out and fails the test, throwing me back to the command prompt. This is normally not a problem but getting rather annoying right now as I am trying to work out some rather complex logic. Any ideas if there is a way to bypass this situation? For example: (rdb:1) TuRawBillDetail.includes(:account_subcode).select("DISTINCT account_product_id") INTERNAL ERROR!!! missing attribute: account_subcode_id /Users/DK/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p136 at ncc_billing/gems/activerecord-3.0.3/lib/active_record/association_preload.rb:324:in `block in preload_belongs_to_association'' ... re/runner.rb:10:in `block in autorun''F............................. Failures: ... David -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20110203/4a1dc870/attachment.html>
Scott Taylor
2011-Feb-03 14:48 UTC
[rspec-users] Is there a way to tell rspec not to fail the test while in debugger?
Probably manually rescuing your debugger call would work: begin debugger rescue Exception end Scott On Feb 3, 2011, at 9:18 AM, David Kahn wrote:> I am curious as with Test::Unit I could go into the debugger and stay all day inside of a test and make all kinds of errors without a problem. With rspec I experience that if I make a bad query/ActiveRecord call that it flips out and fails the test, throwing me back to the command prompt. This is normally not a problem but getting rather annoying right now as I am trying to work out some rather complex logic. Any ideas if there is a way to bypass this situation? > > For example: > > (rdb:1) TuRawBillDetail.includes(:account_subcode).select("DISTINCT account_product_id") > INTERNAL ERROR!!! missing attribute: account_subcode_id > /Users/DK/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p136 at ncc_billing/gems/activerecord-3.0.3/lib/active_record/association_preload.rb:324:in `block in preload_belongs_to_association'' > ... > re/runner.rb:10:in `block in autorun''F............................. > > Failures: > ... > > > > David > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
David Kahn
2011-Feb-03 15:28 UTC
[rspec-users] Is there a way to tell rspec not to fail the test while in debugger?
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Scott Taylor <scott at railsnewbie.com> wrote:> > Probably manually rescuing your debugger call would work: > > begin > debugger > rescue Exception > end >Thanks, I just tried this but no go, the rspec still trips and fails me out. Maybe I have a really different methodology but I depend a lot on working stuff out in the debugger.> > Scott > > On Feb 3, 2011, at 9:18 AM, David Kahn wrote: > > > I am curious as with Test::Unit I could go into the debugger and stay all > day inside of a test and make all kinds of errors without a problem. With > rspec I experience that if I make a bad query/ActiveRecord call that it > flips out and fails the test, throwing me back to the command prompt. This > is normally not a problem but getting rather annoying right now as I am > trying to work out some rather complex logic. Any ideas if there is a way to > bypass this situation? > > > > For example: > > > > (rdb:1) TuRawBillDetail.includes(:account_subcode).select("DISTINCT > account_product_id") > > INTERNAL ERROR!!! missing attribute: account_subcode_id > > /Users/DK/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p136 at ncc_billing/gems/activerecord-3.0.3/lib/active_record/association_preload.rb:324:in > `block in preload_belongs_to_association'' > > ... > > re/runner.rb:10:in `block in autorun''F............................. > > > > Failures: > > ... > > > > > > > > David > > _______________________________________________ > > rspec-users mailing list > > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20110203/ad1d873d/attachment.html>
David Chelimsky
2011-Feb-03 16:32 UTC
[rspec-users] Is there a way to tell rspec not to fail the test while in debugger?
On Feb 3, 2011, at 9:28 AM, David Kahn wrote:> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Scott Taylor <scott at railsnewbie.com> wrote: > > Probably manually rescuing your debugger call would work: > > begin > debugger > rescue Exception > end > > Thanks, I just tried this but no go, the rspec still trips and fails me out. Maybe I have a really different methodology but I depend a lot on working stuff out in the debugger.I actually do this sort of thing all the time, but I''ve never run into the problem you''re talking about. The only thing I can think of is that there is a message expectation in the spec that you''re triggering a failure on (they fail fast whenever they can). Are you setting any message expectations? Or using stubs of some kind?> > > Scott > > On Feb 3, 2011, at 9:18 AM, David Kahn wrote: > > > I am curious as with Test::Unit I could go into the debugger and stay all day inside of a test and make all kinds of errors without a problem. With rspec I experience that if I make a bad query/ActiveRecord call that it flips out and fails the test, throwing me back to the command prompt. This is normally not a problem but getting rather annoying right now as I am trying to work out some rather complex logic. Any ideas if there is a way to bypass this situation? > > > > For example: > > > > (rdb:1) TuRawBillDetail.includes(:account_subcode).select("DISTINCT account_product_id") > > INTERNAL ERROR!!! missing attribute: account_subcode_id > > /Users/DK/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p136 at ncc_billing/gems/activerecord-3.0.3/lib/active_record/association_preload.rb:324:in `block in preload_belongs_to_association'' > > ... > > re/runner.rb:10:in `block in autorun''F............................. > > > > Failures: > > ... > > > > > > > > David > > _______________________________________________ > > rspec-users mailing list > > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20110203/441c0234/attachment.html>
David Kahn
2011-Feb-03 17:04 UTC
[rspec-users] Is there a way to tell rspec not to fail the test while in debugger?
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:32 AM, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com>wrote:> On Feb 3, 2011, at 9:28 AM, David Kahn wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Scott Taylor <scott at railsnewbie.com>wrote: > >> >> Probably manually rescuing your debugger call would work: >> >> begin >> debugger >> rescue Exception >> end >> > > Thanks, I just tried this but no go, the rspec still trips and fails me > out. Maybe I have a really different methodology but I depend a lot on > working stuff out in the debugger. > > > I actually do this sort of thing all the time, but I''ve never run into the > problem you''re talking about. The only thing I can think of is that there is > a message expectation in the spec that you''re triggering a failure on (they > fail fast whenever they can). Are you setting any message expectations? Or > using stubs of some kind? >No, at least nothing consciously as I am rather green overall at using rspec. This seems to be happening across projects --- I kind of took it for a necessary evil until now where it started eating into my time and patience. In fact the spec where this was happening was just a one-liner "Model.all.size.should == 3" or the like. This is my spec helper, if that helps: # This file is copied to spec/ when you run ''rails generate rspec:install'' ENV["RAILS_ENV"] ||= ''test'' require File.expand_path("../../config/environment", __FILE__) require ''rspec/rails'' require ''paperclip/matchers'' require Rails.root.join(''db'',''seeds'') # Requires supporting ruby files with custom matchers and macros, etc, # in spec/support/ and its subdirectories. Dir[Rails.root.join("spec/support/**/*.rb")].each {|f| require f} RSpec.configure do |config| config.mock_with :rspec # Remove this line if you''re not using ActiveRecord or ActiveRecord fixtures config.fixture_path = "#{::Rails.root}/spec/fixtures" # If you''re not using ActiveRecord, or you''d prefer not to run each of your # examples within a transaction, remove the following line or assign false # instead of true. config.use_transactional_fixtures = true config.include Paperclip::Shoulda::Matchers end> > > >> >> Scott >> >> On Feb 3, 2011, at 9:18 AM, David Kahn wrote: >> >> > I am curious as with Test::Unit I could go into the debugger and stay >> all day inside of a test and make all kinds of errors without a problem. >> With rspec I experience that if I make a bad query/ActiveRecord call that it >> flips out and fails the test, throwing me back to the command prompt. This >> is normally not a problem but getting rather annoying right now as I am >> trying to work out some rather complex logic. Any ideas if there is a way to >> bypass this situation? >> > >> > For example: >> > >> > (rdb:1) TuRawBillDetail.includes(:account_subcode).select("DISTINCT >> account_product_id") >> > INTERNAL ERROR!!! missing attribute: account_subcode_id >> > /Users/DK/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p136 at ncc_billing/gems/activerecord-3.0.3/lib/active_record/association_preload.rb:324:in >> `block in preload_belongs_to_association'' >> > ... >> > re/runner.rb:10:in `block in autorun''F............................. >> > >> > Failures: >> > ... >> > >> > >> > >> > David >> > _______________________________________________ >> > rspec-users mailing list >> > rspec-users at rubyforge.org >> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rspec-users mailing list >> rspec-users at rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >> > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20110203/7dd097fe/attachment-0001.html>
David Chelimsky
2011-Feb-03 17:24 UTC
[rspec-users] Is there a way to tell rspec not to fail the test while in debugger?
On Feb 3, 2011, at 11:04 AM, David Kahn wrote:> > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:32 AM, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 3, 2011, at 9:28 AM, David Kahn wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Scott Taylor <scott at railsnewbie.com> wrote: >> >> Probably manually rescuing your debugger call would work: >> >> begin >> debugger >> rescue Exception >> end >> >> Thanks, I just tried this but no go, the rspec still trips and fails me out. Maybe I have a really different methodology but I depend a lot on working stuff out in the debugger. > > I actually do this sort of thing all the time, but I''ve never run into the problem you''re talking about. The only thing I can think of is that there is a message expectation in the spec that you''re triggering a failure on (they fail fast whenever they can). Are you setting any message expectations? Or using stubs of some kind? > > No, at least nothing consciously as I am rather green overall at using rspec. This seems to be happening across projects --- I kind of took it for a necessary evil until now where it started eating into my time and patience. In fact the spec where this was happening was just a one-liner "Model.all.size.should == 3" or the like. This is my spec helper, if that helps: > > # This file is copied to spec/ when you run ''rails generate rspec:install'' > ENV["RAILS_ENV"] ||= ''test'' > require File.expand_path("../../config/environment", __FILE__) > require ''rspec/rails'' > require ''paperclip/matchers'' > > require Rails.root.join(''db'',''seeds'') > > # Requires supporting ruby files with custom matchers and macros, etc, > # in spec/support/ and its subdirectories. > Dir[Rails.root.join("spec/support/**/*.rb")].each {|f| require f} > > RSpec.configure do |config| > config.mock_with :rspec > > # Remove this line if you''re not using ActiveRecord or ActiveRecord fixtures > config.fixture_path = "#{::Rails.root}/spec/fixtures" > > # If you''re not using ActiveRecord, or you''d prefer not to run each of your > # examples within a transaction, remove the following line or assign false > # instead of true. > config.use_transactional_fixtures = true > > config.include Paperclip::Shoulda::Matchers > endEverything looks normal there. Have you tried the same with test/unit yet? If you haven''t, please do create a test case that does exactly the same stuff and see if you can debug any differently. If that works, then at least you have a way to work through this in the short run, and we know something is up with rspec. If it doesn''t work, then we know the problem is likely in some other part of the equation.> > >> >> >> Scott >> >> On Feb 3, 2011, at 9:18 AM, David Kahn wrote: >> >> > I am curious as with Test::Unit I could go into the debugger and stay all day inside of a test and make all kinds of errors without a problem. With rspec I experience that if I make a bad query/ActiveRecord call that it flips out and fails the test, throwing me back to the command prompt. This is normally not a problem but getting rather annoying right now as I am trying to work out some rather complex logic. Any ideas if there is a way to bypass this situation? >> > >> > For example: >> > >> > (rdb:1) TuRawBillDetail.includes(:account_subcode).select("DISTINCT account_product_id") >> > INTERNAL ERROR!!! missing attribute: account_subcode_id >> > /Users/DK/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p136 at ncc_billing/gems/activerecord-3.0.3/lib/active_record/association_preload.rb:324:in `block in preload_belongs_to_association'' >> > ... >> > re/runner.rb:10:in `block in autorun''F............................. >> > >> > Failures: >> > ... >> > >> > >> > >> > David >> > _______________________________________________ >> > rspec-users mailing list >> > rspec-users at rubyforge.org >> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rspec-users mailing list >> rspec-users at rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rspec-users mailing list >> rspec-users at rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20110203/53e26701/attachment.html>
Scott Taylor
2011-Feb-03 17:27 UTC
[rspec-users] Is there a way to tell rspec not to fail the test while in debugger?
On Feb 3, 2011, at 12:04 PM, David Kahn wrote:> > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:32 AM, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 3, 2011, at 9:28 AM, David Kahn wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Scott Taylor <scott at railsnewbie.com> wrote: >> >> Probably manually rescuing your debugger call would work: >> >> begin >> debugger >> rescue Exception >> end >> >> Thanks, I just tried this but no go, the rspec still trips and fails me out. Maybe I have a really different methodology but I depend a lot on working stuff out in the debugger.I do the same. I''ve noticed that actually exiting out to irb will trip things up more often then simple ''p'' / ''print'' statements, so I try to stay out of irb. I''ve only really noticed the debugger itself crashing in rails projects - outside of rails, I''ve never had a problem. Maybe the ruby-debug / trepanning guys can help you out more (I suspect it''s more of a debugger / integration issue with rails than an rspec one). Cheers, Scott> > I actually do this sort of thing all the time, but I''ve never run into the problem you''re talking about. The only thing I can think of is that there is a message expectation in the spec that you''re triggering a failure on (they fail fast whenever they can). Are you setting any message expectations? Or using stubs of some kind? > > No, at least nothing consciously as I am rather green overall at using rspec. This seems to be happening across projects --- I kind of took it for a necessary evil until now where it started eating into my time and patience. In fact the spec where this was happening was just a one-liner "Model.all.size.should == 3" or the like. This is my spec helper, if that helps: > > # This file is copied to spec/ when you run ''rails generate rspec:install'' > ENV["RAILS_ENV"] ||= ''test'' > require File.expand_path("../../config/environment", __FILE__) > require ''rspec/rails'' > require ''paperclip/matchers'' > > require Rails.root.join(''db'',''seeds'') > > # Requires supporting ruby files with custom matchers and macros, etc, > # in spec/support/ and its subdirectories. > Dir[Rails.root.join("spec/support/**/*.rb")].each {|f| require f} > > RSpec.configure do |config| > config.mock_with :rspec > > # Remove this line if you''re not using ActiveRecord or ActiveRecord fixtures > config.fixture_path = "#{::Rails.root}/spec/fixtures" > > # If you''re not using ActiveRecord, or you''d prefer not to run each of your > # examples within a transaction, remove the following line or assign false > # instead of true. > config.use_transactional_fixtures = true > > config.include Paperclip::Shoulda::Matchers > end > > >> >> >> Scott >> >> On Feb 3, 2011, at 9:18 AM, David Kahn wrote: >> >> > I am curious as with Test::Unit I could go into the debugger and stay all day inside of a test and make all kinds of errors without a problem. With rspec I experience that if I make a bad query/ActiveRecord call that it flips out and fails the test, throwing me back to the command prompt. This is normally not a problem but getting rather annoying right now as I am trying to work out some rather complex logic. Any ideas if there is a way to bypass this situation? >> > >> > For example: >> > >> > (rdb:1) TuRawBillDetail.includes(:account_subcode).select("DISTINCT account_product_id") >> > INTERNAL ERROR!!! missing attribute: account_subcode_id >> > /Users/DK/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p136 at ncc_billing/gems/activerecord-3.0.3/lib/active_record/association_preload.rb:324:in `block in preload_belongs_to_association'' >> > ... >> > re/runner.rb:10:in `block in autorun''F............................. >> > >> > Failures: >> > ... >> > >> > >> > >> > David >> > _______________________________________________ >> > rspec-users mailing list >> > rspec-users at rubyforge.org >> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rspec-users mailing list >> rspec-users at rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rspec-users mailing list >> rspec-users at rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20110203/21495ff1/attachment.html>
David Kahn
2011-Feb-03 18:34 UTC
[rspec-users] Is there a way to tell rspec not to fail the test while in debugger?
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:24 AM, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com>wrote:> On Feb 3, 2011, at 11:04 AM, David Kahn wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:32 AM, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com>wrote: > >> On Feb 3, 2011, at 9:28 AM, David Kahn wrote: >> >> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Scott Taylor <scott at railsnewbie.com>wrote: >> >>> >>> Probably manually rescuing your debugger call would work: >>> >>> begin >>> debugger >>> rescue Exception >>> end >>> >> >> Thanks, I just tried this but no go, the rspec still trips and fails me >> out. Maybe I have a really different methodology but I depend a lot on >> working stuff out in the debugger. >> >> >> I actually do this sort of thing all the time, but I''ve never run into the >> problem you''re talking about. The only thing I can think of is that there is >> a message expectation in the spec that you''re triggering a failure on (they >> fail fast whenever they can). Are you setting any message expectations? Or >> using stubs of some kind? >> > > No, at least nothing consciously as I am rather green overall at using > rspec. This seems to be happening across projects --- I kind of took it for > a necessary evil until now where it started eating into my time and > patience. In fact the spec where this was happening was just a one-liner > "Model.all.size.should == 3" or the like. This is my spec helper, if that > helps: > > # This file is copied to spec/ when you run ''rails generate rspec:install'' > ENV["RAILS_ENV"] ||= ''test'' > require File.expand_path("../../config/environment", __FILE__) > require ''rspec/rails'' > require ''paperclip/matchers'' > > require Rails.root.join(''db'',''seeds'') > > # Requires supporting ruby files with custom matchers and macros, etc, > # in spec/support/ and its subdirectories. > Dir[Rails.root.join("spec/support/**/*.rb")].each {|f| require f} > > RSpec.configure do |config| > config.mock_with :rspec > > # Remove this line if you''re not using ActiveRecord or ActiveRecord > fixtures > config.fixture_path = "#{::Rails.root}/spec/fixtures" > > # If you''re not using ActiveRecord, or you''d prefer not to run each of > your > # examples within a transaction, remove the following line or assign > false > # instead of true. > config.use_transactional_fixtures = true > > config.include Paperclip::Shoulda::Matchers > end > > > Everything looks normal there. Have you tried the same with test/unit yet? > If you haven''t, please do create a test case that does exactly the same > stuff and see if you can debug any differently. If that works, then at least > you have a way to work through this in the short run, and we know something > is up with rspec. If it doesn''t work, then we know the problem is likely in > some other part of the equation. >Ok, so I tried in test unit. What I found was mixed. For example, the following line returned [] consistently in test::unit without crashing while in rspec I got a crash and ''INTERNAL ERROR!!! missing attribute: account_subcode_id'' (this line has a flaw in association, which makes sense to me but not why it kills me in rspec but test unit takes it in stride... weird): TuRawBillDetail.includes(:account_subcode).select("DISTINCT account_product_id") Yet, this line (with a bad column) causes both rspec and test unit to crash right away: TuRawBillDetail.includes(:account_subcodes).select("DISTINCT accounproduct_id")> > > >> >> >> >>> >>> Scott >>> >>> On Feb 3, 2011, at 9:18 AM, David Kahn wrote: >>> >>> > I am curious as with Test::Unit I could go into the debugger and stay >>> all day inside of a test and make all kinds of errors without a problem. >>> With rspec I experience that if I make a bad query/ActiveRecord call that it >>> flips out and fails the test, throwing me back to the command prompt. This >>> is normally not a problem but getting rather annoying right now as I am >>> trying to work out some rather complex logic. Any ideas if there is a way to >>> bypass this situation? >>> > >>> > For example: >>> > >>> > (rdb:1) TuRawBillDetail.includes(:account_subcode).select("DISTINCT >>> account_product_id") >>> > INTERNAL ERROR!!! missing attribute: account_subcode_id >>> > /Users/DK/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p136 at ncc_billing/gems/activerecord-3.0.3/lib/active_record/association_preload.rb:324:in >>> `block in preload_belongs_to_association'' >>> > ... >>> > re/runner.rb:10:in `block in autorun''F............................. >>> > >>> > Failures: >>> > ... >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > David >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > rspec-users mailing list >>> > rspec-users at rubyforge.org >>> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rspec-users mailing list >>> rspec-users at rubyforge.org >>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rspec-users mailing list >> rspec-users at rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rspec-users mailing list >> rspec-users at rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >> > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20110203/cbd30d77/attachment-0001.html>