I saw from the thread "color output" that there is a plan to "align the runner". Is there a place to see what that means? I am just curious. Thanks Shane
On 10/2/07, Shane Duan <shane.duan at gmail.com> wrote:> I saw from the thread "color output" that there is a plan to "align > the runner". Is there a place to see what that means? I am just > curious.I think that there are conversations about this on the rspec-devel list. Thus far we haven''t created any sort of public roadmap/gameplan, etc. It''d be nice, but certainly not our first priority. In brief, we want the output from running Scenarios and Examples to look the same. So we''ll want the underlying code to be unified. Make sense?> > Thanks > Shane > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >
Yes. Thanks. That probably means that the customer runner will work with both, if not already.> Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:06:43 -0500 > From: "David Chelimsky" <dchelimsky at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [rspec-users] align the runner > To: rspec-users <rspec-users at rubyforge.org> > Message-ID: > <57c63afe0710021106y22d64512sb92a0dedcf4b8f45 at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > On 10/2/07, Shane Duan <shane.duan at gmail.com> wrote: > > I saw from the thread "color output" that there is a plan to "align > > the runner". Is there a place to see what that means? I am just > > curious. > > I think that there are conversations about this on the rspec-devel > list. Thus far we haven''t created any sort of public roadmap/gameplan, > etc. It''d be nice, but certainly not our first priority. > > In brief, we want the output from running Scenarios and Examples to > look the same. So we''ll want the underlying code to be unified. Make > sense? > > > > > Thanks > > Shane > > _______________________________________________ > > rspec-users mailing list > > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > >
On 10/2/07, Shane Duan <shane.duan at gmail.com> wrote:> Yes. Thanks. > > That probably means that the customer runner will work with both, if > not already.Customer Runner? I assume you mean what we''ve been calling Story Runner, yes? We''re calling that Scenario Runner from now on (because it makes more sense to run scenarios and examples than stories and specs).> > > > Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:06:43 -0500 > > From: "David Chelimsky" <dchelimsky at gmail.com> > > Subject: Re: [rspec-users] align the runner > > To: rspec-users <rspec-users at rubyforge.org> > > Message-ID: > > <57c63afe0710021106y22d64512sb92a0dedcf4b8f45 at mail.gmail.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > > > On 10/2/07, Shane Duan <shane.duan at gmail.com> wrote: > > > I saw from the thread "color output" that there is a plan to "align > > > the runner". Is there a place to see what that means? I am just > > > curious. > > > > I think that there are conversations about this on the rspec-devel > > list. Thus far we haven''t created any sort of public roadmap/gameplan, > > etc. It''d be nice, but certainly not our first priority. > > > > In brief, we want the output from running Scenarios and Examples to > > look the same. So we''ll want the underlying code to be unified. Make > > sense? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > Shane > > > _______________________________________________ > > > rspec-users mailing list > > > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >
Sorry, I just looked at the documentation and I meant runner extensions.> Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 14:14:45 -0500 > From: "David Chelimsky" <dchelimsky at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [rspec-users] align the runner > To: rspec-users <rspec-users at rubyforge.org> > Message-ID: > <57c63afe0710021214q2166ebe0t6a4452b9b0148d1e at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > On 10/2/07, Shane Duan <shane.duan at gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes. Thanks. > > > > That probably means that the customer runner will work with both, if > > not already. > > Customer Runner? I assume you mean what we''ve been calling Story > Runner, yes? We''re calling that Scenario Runner from now on (because > it makes more sense to run scenarios and examples than stories and > specs). > > >