The "rspec" rake task collects all _spec files in the spec directory, and excludes the "watir" directory. Is this indicating a preference for using Watir over Selenium? I would like it better to standardize on something more neutral, ''ui'' perhaps? /Marcus -- Marcus Ahnve http://marcus.ahnve.net
I also noticed that there is a Rake task named Watir. /Marcus On 4/11/07, Marcus Ahnve <marcus at ahnve.com> wrote:> The "rspec" rake task collects all _spec files in the spec directory, > and excludes the "watir" directory. > > Is this indicating a preference for using Watir over Selenium? I would > like it better to standardize on something more neutral, ''ui'' perhaps? > > /Marcus > > -- > Marcus Ahnve > http://marcus.ahnve.net >
On 4/11/07, Marcus Ahnve <marcus at ahnve.com> wrote:> The "rspec" rake task collects all _spec files in the spec directory, > and excludes the "watir" directory. > > Is this indicating a preference for using Watir over Selenium?I''m not sure why you think that''s the case. If you look in subversion, there is a spec_ui project with some experimental support for both Watir and Selenium.> I would > like it better to standardize on something more neutral, ''ui'' perhaps? > > /Marcus > > -- > Marcus Ahnve > http://marcus.ahnve.net > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >
On 4/11/07, Marcus Ahnve <mahnve at gmail.com> wrote:> I also noticed that there is a Rake task named Watir. >Which one are you referring to? Where did you find this task?> /Marcus > > On 4/11/07, Marcus Ahnve <marcus at ahnve.com> wrote: > > The "rspec" rake task collects all _spec files in the spec directory, > > and excludes the "watir" directory. > > > > Is this indicating a preference for using Watir over Selenium? I would > > like it better to standardize on something more neutral, ''ui'' perhaps? > > > > /Marcus > > > > -- > > Marcus Ahnve > > http://marcus.ahnve.net > > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >
On 4/11/07, aslak hellesoy <aslak.hellesoy at gmail.com> wrote:> On 4/11/07, Marcus Ahnve <marcus at ahnve.com> wrote: > > The "rspec" rake task collects all _spec files in the spec directory, > > and excludes the "watir" directory. > > > > Is this indicating a preference for using Watir over Selenium? > > I''m not sure why you think that''s the case. If you look in subversion, > there is a spec_ui project with some experimental support for both > Watir and Selenium.Yes, I am actually using spec_ui. My thought was based on the dir excluded being named "watir". But still, wouldn''t it be better to use a more generic name for ui tests? /Marcus
On 4/11/07, Marcus Ahnve <mahnve at gmail.com> wrote:> On 4/11/07, aslak hellesoy <aslak.hellesoy at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 4/11/07, Marcus Ahnve <marcus at ahnve.com> wrote: > > > The "rspec" rake task collects all _spec files in the spec directory, > > > and excludes the "watir" directory. > > > > > > Is this indicating a preference for using Watir over Selenium? > > > > I''m not sure why you think that''s the case. If you look in subversion, > > there is a spec_ui project with some experimental support for both > > Watir and Selenium. > > Yes, I am actually using spec_ui. My thought was based on the dir > excluded being named "watir". >Fixed! Nothing magic (watir) is excluded anymore. (I admit it was a temporary hack to avoid running example_rails_app''s watir specs, which are still a little quirky to set up). Aslak> But still, wouldn''t it be better to use a more generic name for ui tests? > > /Marcus > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >