search for: _spec

...:views they all pass. But when I $ rake spec I get <path to gem>/activesupport-2.3.11/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:177: stack level too deep (SystemStackError) I''ve been tinkering around with the rake file, and when I change t.spec_files = FileList[''spec/**/*_spec.rb''] in the default task to hit just one of the subdirectories, such as t.spec_files = FileList[''spec/models/**/*_spec.rb''] then rake spec works. I''ve done this for models, controllers, and views, and rake spec works fine for each. But including all of the...

I''m having trouble with TextMate and assigning the RSpec language to *_spec.rb files within rails projects. Here is what is happening: I''m in a file that has the language "Ruby on Rails" selected. I do a ctrl-shift-down to switch to the corresponding _spec.rb file. The _spec.rb file has the language "Ruby on Rails" selected. I change the lang...

Hi Easy one - I just wondered why all spec files for rspec_on_rails end "_spec.rb" instead of just ".rb"? They are all inside the spec folder so surely the fact they are specs is implicit? Ashley

...h was usually generated with a glob pattern and an explicit call to Dir.glob). Now it only takes a glob pattern: http://rdoc.info/github/rspec/rspec-core/master/RSpec/Core/RakeTask#pattern-instance_method So how am I supposed to express the following in one glob pattern? Dir.glob("spec/**/*_spec.rb") - Dir.glob("spec/javascript/**/*_spec.rb") Or is there a better way that I''m missing entirely, Best, Scott -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20101106/9b2099ac/a...

...rubyforge.org/tools/rcov.html and decided to add it to my project. My rakefile looks like this: require "rake" require "spec/rake/spectask" desc "Run all specs with RCov" Spec::Rake::SpecTask.new("spec:rcov") do |t| t.spec_files = FileList["spec/**/*_spec.rb"] t.rcov = true end When I run rake spec:rcov, it runs the specs using RCov and generates the reports, but it''s including all my spec files as well. At the very bottom I''ll see stuff like spec/models/user_spec.rb 89 73 100.0% it even includes spec_helper.rb...

...I did not want to include and they weren''t included with previous versions. For example, it is going to load all rb files from "." and from "some_dir" and subdirectories. What''s wrong and how can I avoid that? I made simple test, created files called "main_spec.rb" to follow your naming convention. It had only one line in it: puts "spec: " + File.dirname(__FILE__) Now, I executed spec without -p (--pattern) switch to have it to use default option (which is **/*_spec.rb). Everything worked as with version 1.08. But NOW, if I executed spec w...

Where should the specs go for code in the "lib" directory of a Rails app? I made a folder, "spec/lib/", for storing such specs, and RSpec automatically picks them up when run using "rake spec". Before I go ahead and patch rspec_on_rails/lib/autotest/ rails_rspec.rb so that autotest can monitor these specs I''d like to ask whether this is the

The "rspec" rake task collects all _spec files in the spec directory, and excludes the "watir" directory. Is this indicating a preference for using Watir over Selenium? I would like it better to standardize on something more neutral, ''ui'' perhaps? /Marcus -- Marcus Ahnve http://marcus.ahnve.net

So I wanted to cook up a quick integration test for something, and I''m using rspec. I personally just don''t like Cucumber - just a personal preference, not a slam to the test framework at all - and wanted to stick to just pure rspec. So I dumped a quick spec file in spec/ reqests and ran it, and of course everything works. But is this considered bad form, or a less-than-good

Josh Knowles http://joshknowles.com/ just let me know that ZenTest Autotest 3.50 now handles your RSpec specs. http://blog.zenspider.com/archives/2007/04/zentest_version_350_has_been_released.html That''s a great news. Josh also shared with me a quick hack to make autotest work with only the RSpec plugin installed. Add the following into your ~/.autotest file

Hey guys, Is there any way I can get rspec to ignore all files in spec/fixtures when it does a recursive search for all spec/**/*_spec.rb files? The problem I''m facing is that the fixtures for my code are project structures on disk, so I thought I''d make a spec/fixtures with a bunch of different project structures. That works, except obviously those can contain _spec.rb files, which rspec picks up when I try...

...k}") desc "Run the specs under spec/#{task}" Spec::Rake::SpecTask.new(task) do |t| t.fail_on_error = false t.spec_opts = [''--options'', "\"#{RAILS_ROOT}/spec/spec.opts\""] t.spec_files = FileList["spec/#{task}/*_spec.rb"] end namespace(task) do Spec::Rake::SpecTask.new(:rcov) do |t| t.fail_on_error = false t.spec_opts = [''--options'', "\"#{RAILS_ROOT}/spec/spec.opts\""] t.rcov_opts = [''--include'', "\&qu...

Hi all, I am a bit confused when i type rake spec and it gives me this message, No examples matching ./spec/**/*_spec.rb could be found what is that mean that something is not found. and where i can input my the test code because i did have a tiny sample code in user_controller_test.rb. is that the right place to test functional.. plz give me a help thanks -- You received this message because you are subscr...

rake spec:views does not run the specs in my views folder. I can run them with spec <path>. Is there something I missed? ---Brian Yamabe

RSpec-1.1.3 has been released. If you''re using RSpec and autotest, you''ll have to upgrade to RSpec-1.1.3 and ZenTest-3.9.0 at the same time. == Version 1.1.3 Maintenance release. * Tightened up exceptions list in autotest/rails_spec. Closes #264. * Applied patch from Ryan Davis for ZenTest-3.9.0 compatibility * Applied patch from Kero to add step_upcoming to story listeners. Closes #253. * Fixed bug where the wrong named error was not always caught by "should raise_error" * Applied patch from Luis Lavena: No coloured...

Bleeding-edge story-writers, How are you structuring your specs? I am working on a new project and tried this: ./lib ./blah ./spec ./blah ./stories But it breaks autotest, so I moved stories parallel to lib and spec. Also what about suffixes? I have adopted "xyz_story_spec.rb", and "xyz.story" for the time being, with the line runner = Spec::Story::Runner::PlainTextStoryRunner.new( File.expand_path(__FILE__).gsub("_story_spec.rb", ".story") ) in the former. Simple to make TextMate recognise the RS...

...#39;'s extending ActionView::Base, so all the methods on that class (and included modules and such) all become available as methods you can call from the view. I was wondering if there was a similar class, or set of Modules, that I can use to simulate the context for the code inside the _spec.rb file.) -- Tor

Brandon, can you get your Helpers to work in rspec 0.7 ? I''m including them in the context but the render fails to see it. If you have it working, I''ll go back and bang my head against it some more, otherwise I''ll file a bug! Many thanks, Jerry context "account/login (view)" do include StandardHelpers specify ''displays title

Hi, I just noticed that `rake notes` in rails 2.0.2 doesn''t check `spec` directory. So, what I annotated with "FIXME", "TODO" and "OPTIMIZE" on *_spec.rb are discarded. Is there any quick way to `rake notes` task to check `spec` directory? -T

For those of you struggling with TextMate not properly detecting rspec files, Allan Odgaard (the author of TextMate) has kindly provided a tutorial on how to set up TextMate to associate all .rb files with rails and all _spec.rb files with rspec. http://macromates.com/blog/2007/file-type-detection-rspec-rails His instructions work great and switching between rspec and rails files has never been easier. Carl