Rails - Mar 2012 - Device Convention for Scope ?

I''ve been using device for quite some times now. I was wondering a good
practice to design the application with scope. Usually I choose to separate
the admin part and the user part. so there is two model Admin and User.

Admin functionality are scoped with Admin , And user functionality are just
like the usual rails covention.
for instance in the controller there might be something like this

admin/documents_controller.rb
application_controller.rb
documents_controller.rb

so for example the the DocumentsController < ApplicationController
while ApplicationController < ActionController::Base

now let say I want the ApplicationController "like" for admin. What is
the
best way to implement this ?
maybe like Admin::DocumentsController < Admin::AdminController, and
Admin::AdminController < ActionController::Base maybe ?

this part get confusing if I perceive Admin as a resource, like managing
the admins. so it would be another controller like Admin::AdminsController ?

have you been into this sort of scenario ? and how would you tackle the
problem ?

Thanks

Ahmy Y

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

On 27 March 2012 11:43, Ahmy Yulrizka
<ahmy135-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
wrote:
> I''ve been using device for quite some times now. I was wondering a
good
> practice to design the application with scope. Usually I choose to separate
> the admin part and the user part. so there is two model Admin and User.
I would not do it that way, I would have just users and roles,
probably using the cancan gem.

Colin

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

I would suggest you to  use cancan gem instead of devise scope or 
namespace, it would be necessary to understand and implement.

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.