Travis D. Warlick Jr.
2011-Jul-09 19:45 UTC
ActiveRecord modules inclusion verification and future-proofing in extensions
I did a little work on the composite_primary_keys gem last night, and I wrote this: module ActiveRecord class Base def can_change_primary_key_values? false end end end module ActiveModel module Dirty def can_change_primary_key_values? true end end end My original intention was 1) allow overriding of the ability to change composite-primary-key values on a per-model basis, and 2) verify the inclusion of the Dirty module (because of the requirement to know the original values). I realized this morning that my second intention is unecessary since Dirty is always included into an ActiveRecord model; however, I then considered "future-proofing". This brings me to my question: is there any future-proofing value to this (or does anyone see this as a necessary requirement)? Specifically, with the modularization of Rails, would it be possible (or is there any consideration) to allow the removal of modules like Dirty from being a requirement of an ActiveRecord model? -- ****************************************** * Travis D. Warlick, Jr. * Software Engineer * Zerista, Inc. & Operis Systems, LLC ****************************************** -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.