Rails - May 2011 - Help save my marriage ... correct route, so enable MVC logic v's should be regular file, trying to send it

Hi All,

I''ve been up until the small hours for the past couple of night trying
to get my Rhodes navigation working!

In essence I have the following in the root index.erb

    <li>
        <a href="<%= url_for :controller => :Model,
        :action => :do_Action %>">Model</a>
    </li>

    <li>
        <a href="<%= url_for :controller => :Model2,
        :action => :do_Action2 %>">Model2</a>
    </li>

However, Model and Model2 behave differently, thus:

Extract from rholog.txt ...


HttpServer| Decide what to do with uri /app/Model/do_Action

HttpServer| Uri /app/Model/do_Action is correct route, so enable MVC
logic

...

HttpServer| Decide what to do with uri /app/OtherModel/do_OtherAction

HttpServer| Uri /app/OtherModel/do_OtherAction should be regular file,
trying to send it

... resulting in ...

HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found

...

So my question really boils down to what does the framework use to
decide whether to treat the request as either a correct route
therefore invoking the MVC logic or as a regular file, which will
never be found as do_OtherAction doesn''t exist!


Many thanks in advance,
Cheers,
Jason

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.

which tool you are using to develop Rhodes applications?

On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Jason
<jason.mcneil.mca-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I''ve been up until the small hours for the past couple of night
trying
> to get my Rhodes navigation working!
>
> In essence I have the following in the root index.erb
>
>    <li>
>        <a href="<%= url_for :controller => :Model,
>        :action => :do_Action %>">Model</a>
>    </li>
>
>    <li>
>        <a href="<%= url_for :controller => :Model2,
>        :action => :do_Action2 %>">Model2</a>
>    </li>
>
> However, Model and Model2 behave differently, thus:
>
> Extract from rholog.txt ...
>
>
> HttpServer| Decide what to do with uri /app/Model/do_Action
>
> HttpServer| Uri /app/Model/do_Action is correct route, so enable MVC
> logic
>
> ...
>
> HttpServer| Decide what to do with uri /app/OtherModel/do_OtherAction
>
> HttpServer| Uri /app/OtherModel/do_OtherAction should be regular file,
> trying to send it
>
> ... resulting in ...
>
> HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found
>
> ...
>
> So my question really boils down to what does the framework use to
> decide whether to treat the request as either a correct route
> therefore invoking the MVC logic or as a regular file, which will
> never be found as do_OtherAction doesn''t exist!
>
>
> Many thanks in advance,
> Cheers,
> Jason
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>
>
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.