Hi list ! More often then not when talking about zena, I find people saying that "we don''t need no freakin'' CMS, Rails *is* a CMS". I posted an article on zenadmin.org with some reflections around this issue and why some people find it useful to build such tools for rails (adva-cms, radiant, zena): http://bit.ly/2rJa6D Gaspard -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Gaspard Bucher wrote:> More often then not when talking about zena, I find people saying that > "we don''t need no freakin'' CMS, Rails *is* a CMS". >> > GaspardRails is to a CMS as a truck is to a banana. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Gaspard Bucher <rails-mailing-list-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > Hi list ! > > More often then not when talking about zena, I find people saying that > "we don''t need no freakin'' CMS, Rails *is* a CMS".Oh come on! Seriously?> > I posted an article on zenadmin.org with some reflections around this > issue and why some people find it useful to build such tools for rails > (adva-cms, radiant, zena): > > http://bit.ly/2rJa6D > > Gaspard > ---- Leonardo Mateo. There''s no place like ~
Leonardo Mateo wrote:> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Gaspard Bucher > <rails-mailing-list-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org> wrote: >> >> Hi list ! >> >> More often then not when talking about zena, I find people saying that >> "we don''t need no freakin'' CMS, Rails *is* a CMS". > Oh come on! Seriously?In fact, the complete argument is that Rails with generic plugins = CMS. But these arguments mostly date from the early ages of the CMS page on rails'' first wiki when people were discovering REST, pretty urls and scaffolding...> >> >> I posted an article on zenadmin.org with some reflections around this >> issue and why some people find it useful to build such tools for rails >> (adva-cms, radiant, zena): >> >> http://bit.ly/2rJa6D >> >> Gaspard >> -- > > > > -- > Leonardo Mateo. > There''s no place like ~-- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
This isn''t the appropriate venue for your blogspam. -eric On Nov 9, 12:21 pm, Gaspard Bucher <rails-mailing-l...-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org> wrote:> Leonardo Mateo wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Gaspard Bucher > > <rails-mailing-l...-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > >> Hi list ! > > >> More often then not when talking about zena, I find people saying that > >> "we don''t need no freakin'' CMS, Rails *is* a CMS". > > Oh come on! Seriously? > > In fact, the complete argument is that Rails with generic plugins = CMS. > But these arguments mostly date from the early ages of the CMS page on > rails'' first wiki when people were discovering REST, pretty urls and > scaffolding... > > > > > > >> I posted an article on zenadmin.org with some reflections around this > >> issue and why some people find it useful to build such tools for rails > >> (adva-cms, radiant, zena): > > >>http://bit.ly/2rJa6D > > >> Gaspard > >> -- > > > -- > > Leonardo Mateo. > > There''s no place like ~ > > -- > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.
On Nov 9, 1:50 pm, Ilan Berci <rails-mailing-l...-ARtvInVfO7ksV2N9l4h3zg@public.gmane.org> wrote:> Gaspard Bucher wrote: > > More often then not when talking about zena, I find people saying that > > "we don''t need no freakin'' CMS, Rails *is* a CMS". > > > Gaspard > > Rails is to a CMS as a truck is to a banana. > -- > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.You cannot use a truck to build a banana. And I feel dirty for bumping this thread :(