I have a rails application on a remote server and a different rails application on a local server. I need to exchange some data between them. I have full control of both ends. The Web Services chapter of AWDR begin with "This chapter is mildly controversial...For new applications where you aren’t constrained by external interfaces, you might want to consider using a lighter-weight REST approach." Googling turns up a bunch of articles, but they tend to be older, and I''m concerned that I wouldn''t be following the latest thinking. Any pointers? Thanks, -George --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
George, > I have a rails application on a remote server and a different rails > application on a local server. I need to exchange some data between > them. I have full control of both ends. > The Web Services chapter of AWDR begin with .. WebServices are so 2006. ActiveResources is the way to go now. Next to what you''ll find on the web, give a look at this page about "internal mashups". http://blog.nicksieger.com/articles/2007/10/06/railsconf-europe-hydra The idea is to split one big monolithic app into many parts, running on one or many servers. Alain Ravet --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On Nov 12, 2007, at 3:23 PM, Alain Ravet wrote:> WebServices are so 2006. ActiveResources is the way to go now. > > Next to what you''ll find on the web, give a look at this page about > "internal mashups". > http://blog.nicksieger.com/articles/2007/10/06/railsconf-europe- > hydra > > The idea is to split one big monolithic app into many parts, running > on one or many servers.Thanks Alain. Some interesting stuff there. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---