Anyone successfully using attachment_fu with rails 1.2.5 and/or rails 2.0 pre? I would like to use database storage. -- Jochen Kaechelin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
The attachment_fu tests fail for me against the 2.0 preview release, as do those for acts_as_attachment and acts_as_paranoid. -Sven On Oct 20, 3:22 pm, Jochen Kaechelin <giss...-Vg5pTm5GbeLoK6nBLMlh1Q@public.gmane.org> wrote:> Anyone successfully using attachment_fu with rails 1.2.5 and/or > rails 2.0 pre? > > I would like to use database storage. > > -- > Jochen Kaechelin--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Jochen Kaechelin wrote:> Anyone successfully using attachment_fu with rails 1.2.5 and/or > rails 2.0 pre? > > I would like to use database storage.I am using attachment_fu with Rails 1.2.5 with no problem, using both file and s3 storage. As Sven noted, the tests do fail, but, at least for my simple usage, it seems to be fine in operation. - Danny -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
> I am using attachment_fu with Rails 1.2.5 with no problem, using both > file and s3 storage. As Sven noted, the tests do fail, but, at least > for my simple usage, it seems to be fine in operation. > > - DannyI''d chalk it up to bad tests. I''m using it in about every one of my projects without problems (rails 2.0). acts_as_attachment is the old version, I don''t recall what version of rails it was written for, but I''d definitely suggest attachment_fu. -- Rick Olson http://lighthouseapp.com http://weblog.techno-weenie.net http://mephistoblog.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Thanks, Rick, that''s good to know. The tests work better in 1.2.5 but by default they seem to want to test every option, and they require that you have a lot of stuff installed (rmagick, etc.). I''m not sure what you''re supposed to do as a plugin developer to write tests that are sufficient without being burdensome to run. And thanks for these plugins, in any case. For what it''s worth the problems I''ve had with your plugin tests on the 2.0 preview release wither take the form of the tests trying to load, say, 1.2.5 gem rails, when 1.2.5.xxxx has already been loaded (if both 1.2.5 and 1.2.5.xxxx are installed) or they are complaints about the missing breakpoint library. -Sven On Oct 20, 7:17 pm, "Rick Olson" <technowee...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > I am using attachment_fu with Rails 1.2.5 with no problem, using both > > file and s3 storage. As Sven noted, the tests do fail, but, at least > > for my simple usage, it seems to be fine in operation. > > > - Danny > > I''d chalk it up to bad tests. I''m using it in about every one of my > projects without problems (rails 2.0). acts_as_attachment is the old > version, I don''t recall what version of rails it was written for, but > I''d definitely suggest attachment_fu. > > -- > Rick Olsonhttp://lighthouseapp.comhttp://weblog.techno-weenie.nethttp://mephistoblog.com--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---