Rails - Apr 2006 - Dead Simple Deployment

Friends-

	I have put up a small tutorial about my experimentations with  
mongrel clusters behind an HTTP load balancer with no front web  
server like lighty or apache. This little setup is extremely powerful  
for how easy it is to set up. I would love for more folks to  
experiment with this type of setup to expose any issues it may have  
as a production environment. I have had zero issues with it so far  
and I am able to get 800-1000 req/sec for static assets and 70-140  
req/sec for full blown dynamic rails pages.

  http://brainspl.at/articles/2006/04/26/dead-simple-deployment

Let me know what you think.

Cheers-
-Ezra

Very interesting. Thanks.


On 4/26/06, Ezra Zygmuntowicz <ezmobius@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> Friends-
>
>         I have put up a small tutorial about my experimentations with
> mongrel clusters behind an HTTP load balancer with no front web
> server like lighty or apache. This little setup is extremely powerful
> for how easy it is to set up. I would love for more folks to
> experiment with this type of setup to expose any issues it may have
> as a production environment. I have had zero issues with it so far
> and I am able to get 800-1000 req/sec for static assets and 70-140
> req/sec for full blown dynamic rails pages.
>
>   http://brainspl.at/articles/2006/04/26/dead-simple-deployment
>
> Let me know what you think.
>
> Cheers-
> -Ezra
> _______________________________________________
> Rails mailing list
> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060427/de3cf62e/attachment.html

Ezra, you continue to amaze.  I can''t wait to give this a try.  Thanks
for providing it.

Michael

And thanks from here, too!  This is going to be awesome.  (Thanks go  
out to Zed too!)

Duane Johnson
(canadaduane)
http://blog.inquirylabs.com/


On Apr 26, 2006, at 6:37 PM, Michael Trier wrote:
> Ezra, you continue to amaze.  I can''t wait to give this a try. 
Thanks
> for providing it.
>
> Michael