Hi,> Has anyone used Eclipse with RDT > (wiki.rubyonrails.com/rails/show/RubyDevelopmentTools)? I have > never used Eclipse. Would it be worth my time to setup Eclipse with RDT > to create my first rails project?If Eclipse runs well on your machine (needs some CPU and RAM), then I think you will like it. It''s quite OK, if you don''t want more than a Ruby editor. Bye, Andras
Has anyone used Eclipse with RDT (wiki.rubyonrails.com/rails/show/RubyDevelopmentTools)? I have never used Eclipse. Would it be worth my time to setup Eclipse with RDT to create my first rails project?
IMHO it is the best Windows IDE out there. I''ve tried them all. I didn''t care for ArachnoRuby because it would crash constantly on my system. I have started doing Rails dev using Eclipse with the RDT and it is quite nice. It''s not really feature complete yet though, you still have to run the Rails generator scripts via the command line and then refresh your project but that isn''t really a big deal. Also, tests aren''t working quite right yet. I haven''t updated to the latest nightly in about a week so maybe that''s been fixed by now.> Hi, > > > Has anyone used Eclipse with RDT > > (wiki.rubyonrails.com/rails/show/RubyDevelopmentTools)? I have > > never used Eclipse. Would it be worth my time to setup Eclipse with RDT > > to create my first rails project? > > If Eclipse runs well on your machine (needs some CPU and RAM), then I > think you will like it. It''s quite OK, if you don''t want more than a Ruby > editor. > > Bye, > Andras > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org > lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
kesslerdn wrote:> Has anyone used Eclipse with RDT > (wiki.rubyonrails.com/rails/show/RubyDevelopmentTools)? I have > never used Eclipse. Would it be worth my time to setup Eclipse with RDT > to create my first rails project?I like it pretty much, the RDT guys are doing a great job there. However, I''d really suggest installing a nightly build of RDT, it''s usually stable enough. An excellent guide written by Brian Hogan on setting up RDT and Rails on Eclipse can be found here: napcs.com/howto/railsonwindows.html Kristof ps. while it''s on topic, do you and other railers would be interested in a one-shot download of the Eclipse runtime (no java tools) plus eclipse webtools plus ftp/webdav plugins plus RDT already packaged into a single product?
On Tuesday 09 August 2005 11:27 am, kheon-Wuw85uim5zDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org wrote:> Also, tests aren''t working quite right yet. I haven''t updated to the latest > nightly in about a week so maybe that''s been fixed by now.The problem launch unit-tests on Windows has been fixed.
Hi Kesseline, I use Eclipse + RDT + Subclipse + Clay Modelling Tool. So my entire development is done using Eclipse, including access to subversion repository directly and database design and development. As I work from office and home and I need the same copy of source everywhere and to have code management I use Subversion. Also I do not want to switch from tool to tool for designing DB so Eclipse does help me to have a single development environment. I have thought of using Kdevelop but only problem is it doesn''t have any ER diagram tool which can connect directly to database. Thanks with best regards, Vikrant
1) Eclipse is my choice of editor and RDT works great as does subclipse for version control. RDT has some improvments to be made but only the same kind of stuff other ruby editors are lacking. 2) Kristof Jozsa wrote: "ps. while it''s on topic, do you and other railers would be interested in a one-shot download of the Eclipse runtime (no java tools) plus eclipse webtools plus ftp/webdav plugins plus RDT already packaged into a single product? " I use the light weight run time binary which is so much better! Plus its not a 100MB download. This would be a great download, should include subclipse as well since most Ruby/Rails-ers use version control. K
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Eclipse + RDT + Subclipse is my current installation, and I think it i s great! I just now heard about the Clay modeling tool, so thats my next eclipse extension. And yeah, Almost forgot. I am also about to install the javascript editor stuff (++). Eclipse does indeed have some features by default that other new Ruby IDEs don''t get for free. So it''s a stable foundation for adding Ruby tools. The RDT package is well on it''s way, and I can only second the opinion that all the editors out there seem to have some features left too. The only ''full-fledged'' package available might be vim... :) Anyway, I''ve decided to go with Eclipse from here on. And if I new a tad bit more Java I''d even help out with the development on RDT myself... Current list of things that I''d like to see in eclipse+RTD: - Syntax highlighting of the rhtml files - Improve Rails support; - Adding a button for starting/restarting/stopping the webrick server. - A rails-log view that informs about things happening (color-code and links to code would be fantastic :) - Buttons for running generators - Built in support for running test, profilers etc. Rock on! - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ /*Ronny Hanssen*/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDAmA6MRRzQX3ma+kRAjObAKCoBBUyYJOVH8eDe/JVYrhkAK59PwCeIHU5 MSSpbgz22ylgoSiymjqCCDo=yIDV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Since your all using eclipse... I cant add an interpreter for ruby after I install RDT I named it RUBY182 and set the path to /usr/bin/ruby Im on OSX btw. ANY Ideas? Sam On 8/16/05, Ronny Hanssen <ronnyh-7tg5dEkr+6sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Eclipse + RDT + Subclipse is my current installation, and I think it i s > great! I just now heard about the Clay modeling tool, so thats my next > eclipse extension. And yeah, Almost forgot. I am also about to install > the javascript editor stuff (++). > > Eclipse does indeed have some features by default that other new Ruby > IDEs don''t get for free. So it''s a stable foundation for adding Ruby > tools. The RDT package is well on it''s way, and I can only second the > opinion that all the editors out there seem to have some features left > too. The only ''full-fledged'' package available might be vim... :) > > Anyway, I''ve decided to go with Eclipse from here on. And if I new a tad > bit more Java I''d even help out with the development on RDT myself... > Current list of things that I''d like to see in eclipse+RTD: > - Syntax highlighting of the rhtml files > - Improve Rails support; > - Adding a button for starting/restarting/stopping the webrick server. > - A rails-log view that informs about things happening (color-code > and links to code would be fantastic :) > - Buttons for running generators > - Built in support for running test, profilers etc. > > Rock on! > - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > /*Ronny Hanssen*/ > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFDAmA6MRRzQX3ma+kRAjObAKCoBBUyYJOVH8eDe/JVYrhkAK59PwCeIHU5 > MSSpbgz22ylgoSiymjqCCDo> =yIDV > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org > lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sorry. I had no problem setting the interpreter in the ruby-settings in eclipse, but I''m on Windows. I don''t mean to patronize you in any way, but if I''m to help I have to ask - even stupid questions: I believe that RDT is checking to see if the target exist, but I guess that you have verified that the path and executable for ruby itself is correct? It must be the main ruby interpreter afaik. HTH, Ronny Sam Mayes wrote:> Since your all using eclipse... I cant add an interpreter for ruby > after I install RDT I named it RUBY182 and set the path to > /usr/bin/ruby Im on OSX btw. ANY Ideas? > > Sam >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDAs8dMRRzQX3ma+kRAkbRAKCpLakdarD3jLjRh4Z1A+avXj6J6wCfYs2o zdt+sPgSq8jzws4xJv0C3t0=V0Hz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On 17 Aug 2005, at 06:46, Ronny Hanssen wrote:> Sam Mayes wrote: >> Since your all using eclipse... I cant add an interpreter for ruby >> after I install RDT I named it RUBY182 and set the path to >> /usr/bin/ruby Im on OSX btw. ANY Ideas?In my installation in OSX, the path to ruby is /usr/local/bin/ruby, not /usr/bin/ruby. d -- # David Plans Casal problem.each { |day| assert_nil(spoon) }
Thanks. /usr/bin/ruby is correct . I think it may have been a issues with the dialog box. I delted everything and reinstalled and all is fine now. Thanks again. BTW Ive been using textmate and am very happy with it, But Im starting to really like eclipse and the integration it has (erd,subversion, db workshop) its quite nice. Sam On 8/17/05, David Plans Casal <main-UMI9dqvtDsSRq8AjE7tl8g@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > On 17 Aug 2005, at 06:46, Ronny Hanssen wrote: > > > Sam Mayes wrote: > >> Since your all using eclipse... I cant add an interpreter for ruby > >> after I install RDT I named it RUBY182 and set the path to > >> /usr/bin/ruby Im on OSX btw. ANY Ideas? > > In my installation in OSX, the path to ruby is /usr/local/bin/ruby, not > /usr/bin/ruby. > > d > > -- > # David Plans Casal > > problem.each { |day| > assert_nil(spoon) > } > > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org > lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >
David Plans Casal wrote:> > On 17 Aug 2005, at 06:46, Ronny Hanssen wrote: > >> Sam Mayes wrote: >> >>> Since your all using eclipse... I cant add an interpreter for ruby >>> after I install RDT I named it RUBY182 and set the path to >>> /usr/bin/ruby Im on OSX btw. ANY Ideas? > > > In my installation in OSX, the path to ruby is /usr/local/bin/ruby, not > /usr/bin/ruby.You have to give the full path to the ruby binary, and the ruby binary has to exist... for you to be able to add an interpretor. This is the same for ri and rdoc settings. It needs a fullpath to each of those binaries (or scripts). Zach